Coffee Money
How do the Yapese and Coffee both deal with money? How has stone money changed into actual money? Coffee has become a staple in the lives of many people around the world. It is often seen that caffeine helps awaken one’s mind from doing late-night studying sessions to early morning tests, exams, lectures, and more. As a student who’s in college, I find that a cup of joe really helps wake me up in the morning. While caffeine helps provide us with a much-needed boost of energy, it also comes with a cost. For students who rely on caffeine to stay alert and focused, their daily expenses of money could be drained quickly. As everything had gone up in price coffee used to be $2 now it’s $5. Coffee has undoubtedly become an integral part of the student experience. While it provides much-needed energy and comfort during busy academic days, its financial impact should not be underestimated. The cost of coffee can add up over time, potentially straining student budgets and causing financial stress.
Yapese and coffee represent two very different concepts, one related to a traditional form of currency, and the other to a commodity. Yapese refers to the people of Yap, an island in the Federated States of Micronesia. Yap is known for its unique form of currency called “fai stones.” They are these large, disc-shaped stones made from limestone and can weigh several tons. They are considered valuable and are used as a form of money, land deals, marriages, or settling disputes. Ownership of a particular stone can change hands without physically moving the stone, as the community recognizes the change in ownership. Yap and the Federated States of Micronesia modernized and integrated into the global economy, and the use of stone money for everyday transactions decreased significantly. While stone money still holds cultural and ceremonial significance on the island, it has largely been replaced by modern currencies for practical transactions.
Milton Friedman’s essay titled “The Island of Stone Money” is a well-known and influential piece that discusses the nature of money, value, and economic systems. Friedman discusses some of the concepts of money and how it derives its value. These stones were enormous and difficult to move, yet they served as a medium of exchange and a store of value. The key point he tries to make is that the value of money is not inherently tied to its physical properties but is rather a matter of collective belief and trust in its value. Friedman uses the Yapese story to illustrate the idea that money is essentially a social and psychological construct. This suggests that the value of modern currencies, like the U.S. dollar, is not backed by physical assets like gold but is supported by the trust and confidence of the people who use it. In essence, Friedman’s “Island of Stone Money” challenges some of the conventional thinking about money and highlights the importance of faith and belief in the value of currency. It underscores the idea that money is a social and psychological phenomenon, and its value is determined by your perception of its worth rather than any intrinsic properties. He mostly talks about the influence of the nature of money and how it has contributed to the understanding of monetary economics.
In the contemporary world, coffee productivity stands in stark contrast to stone money’s archaic concept. Coffee is a globally traded commodity and one of the world’s most widely consumed beverages. It is not a form of money but rather a product that is bought and sold for currency. Millions of people worldwide depend on coffee cultivation, trade, and consumption for their livelihoods. Coffee is typically traded in international commodity markets, and its price fluctuates based on factors such as supply and demand, weather conditions, and market speculation. Coffee-producing countries like Brazil, Vietnam, and Colombia are economic powerhouses, with coffee exports contributing significantly to their GDP(Gross Domestic Product). Coffee producers, including individual farmers or coffee-growing cooperatives, sell their coffee beans to coffee roasters and distributors who, in turn, sell coffee products to consumers and businesses. The paradox here lies in how a seemingly ordinary commodity like coffee, derived from a simple bean, can drive economic growth on a global scale. It highlights the role of productivity in modern economies, where efficiency, innovation, and globalization have transformed seemingly mundane products into economic juggernauts.
The evolution of currency, from stone money to digital transactions, mirrors the evolution of human society and the concept of value itself. Stone money represents the earliest forms of currency, where value was rooted in physical objects and collective trust. Over time, humanity transitioned to more versatile forms of currency, such as coins and paper money, backed by governments and economies. In the 21st century, we have witnessed another paradigm shift in the concept of currency. Digital currencies like Bitcoin have gained prominence, challenging the traditional financial system. These cryptocurrencies derive value from cryptographic algorithms and decentralized networks, rather than physical backing. This shift raises questions about the future of money and the role of governments and central banks in regulating and controlling currency.
In summary, Yapese use fei stones as a unique form of traditional currency, while coffee is a commodity that is bought and sold for money in the global market. The Yapese system of money is deeply rooted in their culture and traditions, while coffee represents a widely traded commodity in the global economy. These two concepts are not directly related in terms of how they deal with money, but they illustrate the diversity of monetary systems and economic activities across different cultures and industries. The paradoxes of stone money and coffee productivity offer a fascinating glimpse into the multifaceted nature of value and economic growth. Stone money challenges our preconceived notions of currency, while coffee productivity showcases the potential for innovation and efficiency to drive economic prosperity. As we navigate an ever-changing economic landscape, these paradoxes remind us to remain open to new ideas and to adapt to the evolving dynamics of value and growth in the modern world.
References
“Strains of Digital Money” by Capco Journal of Financial Transformation, No. 44, November 2016
“The Island of Stone Money” by Milton Friedman, The Hoover Institution Stanford University Feb. 1991
I don’t quite know how to respond to this post, Ladybug. It shows both strong writing and an odd failure to grasp the requirements of an essay. Parts of it seem pertinent, as if they’re going to contribute to an overall point or at least a theme that connects the two threads, but I can’t conceive of an angle from which I see the relevance of the coffee economy and the development of stone money. At least three times you insist there’s a connection, but I can’t find it.
Virtually all of the third paragraph, most of the second, and much of the fourth sound as if they were imported from an unrelated essay. Any popular commodity represents massive economic activity, so there’s nothing paradoxical about coffee doing so, any more than petroleum or wheat.
So, I’m mystified. Let’s find the topic sentences of your paragraphs.
1. College students value coffee enough to spend more on it than they can afford.
2. The Yap have abandoned a functional currency for US Dollars for reasons not specified.
3. The value of contemporary money does not depend on its physical properties, as gold coins once did, but is rather a matter of collective belief and trust in its value.
4. Commodities like coffee, because they can be distributed globally, can power large segments of the international economy.
5. Currency has evolved from physical markers of intrinsic value to physical tokens of no intrinsic value to non-physical tokens that gain their value solely from algorithms without intrinsic value and NOT endorsed by any government.
6. The Yap use stones. Coffee is a global commodity. Make of it what you will.
You seem to be able to generate language without any trouble, LadyBug. The text here is grammatical and free of common errors, but it doesn’t often contribute to an argument. It would need fundamental changes to improve. I’ll be happy to help if you’re up to the challenge.
Provisional grade pending your Reply.
Do Reply, please. It’s the way to insure continued access to feedback.
You haven’t replied or made revisions, Ladybug. That’s a bad strategy if you care about grades.
PROVISIONALLY GRADED. Grade is on Canvas or will appear soon.
Revisions (and the regrading that follows) are encouraged but not required.
RESPONDING to feedback is STRENUOUSLY encouraged.