Category Archives: Claims Analysis

Brannan Vines has never been to war. But she’s got a warrior’s skills: hyperawareness, hypervigilance, adrenaline-sharp quick-scanning for danger, for triggers. This claim is factual, analogical and categorical. It is factual because it states that Brannan has never been to … Continue reading →

“Brannan and Caleb can be tense with their own agitation, and tense about each other’s” -This claim implies that not only Caleb has become aware and conscious of his possible reactions, but it also affects Brannan’s as well. -Brannan has … Continue reading →

“Secondary traumatic stress has been documented in the spouses of veterans with PTSD from Vietnam.” This is a factual claim as the word “documented” brings forth the presence of research and that this was not a claim just pulled from … Continue reading →

‘But she and warrior skills “ claiming that she is very skillful Saying that’s she might be a warrior Maybe the cause of her PTSD “Caleb has been home since 2006, way more than enough time for Brannan to catch his … Continue reading →

Brannan Vines has never been to war, but her husband, Caleb, was sent to Iraq twice, where he served in the infantry as a designated marksman This sentence contains a series of factual claims. Brannan could prove never being to … Continue reading →

“Brannen Vines has never been to war” – The woman in the article, Brannen Vines, has never been to war before in her life. – This is the first sentence in the whole article and the author felt that it … Continue reading →