Stone Money-babyyoda1023

Value of Currency

Currency in any form mainly relies on trust, faith and is a measurement of exchange and value.  The nature of money is created out of nothing, however, still plays a fundamental role in different civilizations and societies. “Money is not solid. Its value could disappear” (423, 2017). When trust is broken or dismissed, the value of the currency dissipates as well. Having a national debt of over 14 trillion dollars, money is imaginary, and the dollar has lost its true value, since gold and silver coins. Supporting this claim by author Linton Weeks states, “A million has lost its mystique. A billion isn’t what it used to be, either. Forbes reported earlier this year that there are more than 1,000 billionaires in the world now” (Weeks, 2011). Reporting’s of new billionaires, and multibillionaires every day, currency seems to be very attainable, and has no true meaning. Another example that demonstrates how money is created out of nothing includes “Just last year the U.S. tweaked the way it calculates GDP. And in an instant, the economy was $500 billion bigger”(Goldstein, 2014). Economies run on the idea money is value, but currency is essentially a unit of account that gives value. “The fictional quality of money is inherent in the very idea of money” (423, 2017). This quote demonstrates money is based on faith, which gives it essential value.

A world where currency does have true meaning is the Island of Stone Money, or Yap. “As their island yields no metal, they had to recourse to stone…, is truly a representation of labor as the mined and minted coins of civilization” (Stonemoneyessay.Pdf, n.d.). The island of Yap has a currency based on large stones that pertain a certain amount of labor, hence why it is so valuable. These large stones are made of limestone discs that can weigh up to a car. Stated by author Friedman “…Fei too large to be conveniently moved, its new owner is quite content to accept the bare acknowledgment of ownership and without so much as a mark to indicate the exchange…” (Stonemoneyessay.Pdf, n.d.). This island in the pacific highlights that money is valued through perception and shared through trust of the individuals within that community. Friedman states “money of other countries often seems to us like paper or worthless metal, even when the purchasing power of individual units is high” (Stonemoneyessay.Pdf, n.d.). The people of Yap created a successful currency based on faith and non-physical transactions that demonstrate this non-traditional way of life to outsiders. Seeing a different civilization create currency, it is no different than what America does. Authors Goldstein and Kestenbaum state, “This system, in the end, feels really familiar. If you go online to pay your electric bill, what’s really changing in the world?” (Goldstein & Kestenbaum, 2010). The island of Stone Money supports that currency is an idea that can be created out of nothing, but with faith and trust within, money will keep its true value.

Not believing in currency, Brazil faced disastrous results, but with the aid of the government, there was a creation of exchange. In the Invention of Money, authors state “The government tricked a hundred fifty million people into believing again, that their money was worth something when there was absolutely no evidence to support that claim. And it worked” (423, 2017). Brazil having incredibly high inflation made it impossible to afford basic accessories. “…with 80% inflation, the price is $18. Six months later the sunglasses are $340. And by the end of the year, that price tag reads more than $10,000. Brazilians lived with high inflation like this for decades”(423, 2017). Wanting to expand and create infrastructure with no funds, Brazil created and printed new money out of nothing, leading to incredibly high inflation. “If there’s say, a hundred dollars in the economy, you create a hundred more, now every dollar is worth half as much. That’s inflation. And in Brazil, inflation continued for the next five decades. Year after year, Brazilian money was worth less and less” (423, 2017). Once the value of money decreases, prices result from the economy and what people will pay, rather than the governments idea of what the items are worth. To stabilize high inflation and resolve this issue, the government needed to stop creating money so quickly, and reinforce people’s faith within currency. “They didn’t want to just change the underlying causes of inflation. They wanted to change people themselves. People were the problem. People had to be tricked into thinking money had value, when all signs told them that was absolutely not true” (423, 2017). Real financial problems were fixed with fake currency. The people’s faith in the money, was what made fixed the incredibly high inflation rates. People believed that the economy was fixed since they could no longer see inflation, which resulted in inflation dissipating.

In conclusion, money has no intrinsic value, is created from nothing, and is only valuable when an economy believes in the currency. The idea of money and the power of faith provides a world of exchange universally. Friedman’s work into the Island of Stone Money has illuminated the complex ways that trust, and belief affect financial systems. While Brazil demonstrated individuals can create currency out of nothing. Brazil and the Island of Stone Money are two examples that highlight the important complex structure of human perception when it comes to the value of currency. Whether it comes in the form of stone disks or online banks, money is a widespread product of belief and trust that can be created from nothing.

References

423: The Invention of Money. (2017, December 14). This American Life. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/423/transcript

Goldstein, J. (2014, February 28). The Invention Of “The Economy.” NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/02/28/283477546/the-invention-of-the-economy

Goldstein, J., & Kestenbaum, D. (2010, December 10). The Island Of Stone Money. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2011/02/15/131934618/the-island-of-stone-money

Stonemoneyessay.pdf. (n.d.). Retrieved September 18, 2023, from https://counterintuitive2015.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/stonemoneyessay.pdf

Weeks, L. (2011, August 22). The Trouble With Trillions. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2011/08/22/139846133/the-trouble-with-trillions

This entry was posted in Stone Money. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Stone Money-babyyoda1023

  1. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Thank you for posting ahead of the publication deadline, BabyYoda. I hope you and your classmates who may be reading your feedback will benefit from it while working on your drafts.

    Let’s talk primarily about Argument on this first pass:

    P1. Currency in any form mainly relies on trust, faith and is a measurement of exchange and value. The nature of money is created out of nothing, however, still plays a fundamental role in different civilizations and societies. “Money is not solid. Its value could disappear” (423, 2017). When trust is broken or dismissed, the value of the currency dissipates as well. Having a national debt of over 14 trillion dollars, money is imaginary, and the dollar has lost its true value, since gold and silver coins.

    This is glib and sounds eloquent, BabyYoda. It has a nice rhetorical style. But don’t overpromise in your introduction. Readers will hold you accountable. Has money “lost its true value” or do you just mean “it’s no longer based on how much gold a country owns”?;

    Supporting this claim by author Linton Weeks states, “A million has lost its mystique. A billion isn’t what it used to be, either. Forbes reported earlier this year that there are more than 1,000 billionaires in the world now” (Weeks, 2011). Reporting’s of new billionaires, and multibillionaires every day, currency seems to be very attainable, and has no true meaning.

    I think your point here is that when billionaires are common, the value of every dollar seems to be shrinking, NOT that dollars are meaningless.

    Another example that demonstrates how money is created out of nothing includes “Just last year the U.S. tweaked the way it calculates GDP. And in an instant, the economy was $500 billion bigger”(Goldstein, 2014).

    That’s a sweet point, but it doesn’t quite add up, BabyYoda. The country didn’t create any new money. It just re-calculated what goods and services are worth. It would be like raising the price on the home you’re selling. It doesn’t make you richer to raise the price.

    Economies run on the idea money is value, but currency is essentially a unit of account that gives value.

    I don’t understand that sentence at all.

    “The fictional quality of money is inherent in the very idea of money” (423, 2017). This quote demonstrates money is based on faith, which gives it essential value.

    Agree with the point. But I think you mean “Money is based on faith FOR its essential value.

  2. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    A world where currency does have true meaning is the Island of Stone Money, or Yap. “As their island yields no metal, they had to recourse to stone…, is truly a representation of labor as the mined and minted coins of civilization” (Stonemoneyessay.Pdf, n.d.). The island of Yap has a currency based on large stones that pertain a certain amount of labor, hence why it is so valuable. These large stones are made of limestone discs that can weigh up to a car. Stated by author Friedman “…Fei too large to be conveniently moved, its new owner is quite content to accept the bare acknowledgment of ownership and without so much as a mark to indicate the exchange…” (Stonemoneyessay.Pdf, n.d.).

    You make several important observations here without connecting them to a common thread, BabyYoda. You promise that you’ll reveal what a “true meaning” currency offers, but you don’t actually follow through. Unless it’s the labor expended in quarrying the stones and shaping/transporting them. You drop that point and focus on the “bare acknowledgment of ownership,” which is another fine observation, but not exactly related.

    This island in the pacific highlights that money is valued through perception and shared through trust of the individuals within that community. Friedman states “money of other countries often seems to us like paper or worthless metal, even when the purchasing power of individual units is high” (Stonemoneyessay.Pdf, n.d.). The people of Yap created a successful currency based on faith and non-physical transactions that demonstrate this non-traditional way of life to outsiders.

    When you said the Yap currency had real value, we didn’t expect “through perception and . . . trust.” But I do see the value of this section to help you transition to the American system of moving “digits that represent money.”

    Seeing a different civilization create currency, it is no different than what America does.

    This transition is about half right. We might see the Yap create currency out of rocks, but you and I don’t create currency when we pay our gas bill online. We just move some credits.

    Authors Goldstein and Kestenbaum state, “This system, in the end, feels really familiar. If you go online to pay your electric bill, what’s really changing in the world?” (Goldstein & Kestenbaum, 2010). The island of Stone Money supports that currency is an idea that can be created out of nothing, but with faith and trust within, money will keep its true value.

    The Federal Reserve actually can create money “out of nothing,” but that doesn’t mean money is meaningless or that it has no value to people with gas bills.

    Is this helpful or merely annoying, BabyYoda? I’ll hesitate to post reactions to the remaining paragraphs until I hear from you that you would value it.

  3. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Not believing in currency, Brazil faced disastrous results, but with the aid of the government, there was a creation of exchange. In the Invention of Money, authors state “The government tricked a hundred fifty million people into believing again, that their money was worth something when there was absolutely no evidence to support that claim. And it worked” (423, 2017). Brazil having incredibly high inflation made it impossible to afford basic accessories. “…with 80% inflation, the price is $18. Six months later the sunglasses are $340. And by the end of the year, that price tag reads more than $10,000. Brazilians lived with high inflation like this for decades”(423, 2017). Wanting to expand and create infrastructure with no funds, Brazil created and printed new money out of nothing, leading to incredibly high inflation. “If there’s say, a hundred dollars in the economy, you create a hundred more, now every dollar is worth half as much. That’s inflation. And in Brazil, inflation continued for the next five decades. Year after year, Brazilian money was worth less and less” (423, 2017).

    The sequence here is odd, BabyYoda. You appear to be telling the story in reverse. You name the disaster first, then illustrate runaway inflation with a sunglass anecdote, then explain the root cause of the inflation (government overspending), then detail the impact of printing more money than the economy can support. That’s almost exactly backwards. You can either reverse the sequence or use transitions to guide your readers in reverse. Expecting us to follow you without guidance is dangerous.

    Once the value of money decreases, prices result from the economy and what people will pay, rather than the government’s idea of what the items are worth.

    There is a common misunderstanding that somehow the government wants to control prices. It doesn’t. “The government’s idea of what items are worth” is a myth. The government wants to control CHANGES to the economy like inflation, deflation, too little money in the economy, too much. Government action does change prices, but not because the government thinks sunglasses are overpriced.

    To stabilize high inflation and resolve this issue, the government needed to stop creating money so quickly, and reinforce people’s faith within currency. “They didn’t want to just change the underlying causes of inflation. They wanted to change people themselves. People were the problem. People had to be tricked into thinking money had value, when all signs told them that was absolutely not true” (423, 2017).

    THIS, not “what government thought prices should be,” is the better explanation. The government has a VERY BIG STAKE in public faith in the currency. Everything breaks down if we lose faith in money.

    Real financial problems were fixed with fake currency. The people’s faith in the money, was what made fixed the incredibly high inflation rates. People believed that the economy was fixed since they could no longer see inflation, which resulted in inflation dissipating.

    You speak here as if you had explained the solution, but you’re only really talking “about” the solution. How did the trick work? Did it need to make a clean break with the cruzeiro? Did the substitution of a number that went up every day with a number that stayed the same forever do the trick?

    In conclusion, money has no intrinsic value, is created from nothing, and is only valuable when an economy believes in the currency.

    Lovely, except I’d say when a “population” believes in the currency.

    The idea of money and the power of faith provides a world of exchange universally. Friedman’s work into the Island of Stone Money has illuminated the complex ways that trust, and belief affect financial systems. While Brazil demonstrated individuals can create currency out of nothing. Brazil and the Island of Stone Money are two examples that highlight the important complex structure of human perception when it comes to the value of currency. Whether it comes in the form of stone disks or online banks, money is a widespread product of belief and trust that can be created from nothing.

    This conclusion is rhetorically convincing (I nod all the way through) but ultimately does not say much. When I finish nodding and glance back at what I’ve read, I realize it isn’t substantive. I know I’m asking a lot, but if you can find a final takeaway NOT contained in the body of your essay, your conclusion will be much more satisfying.

    Thank you for encouraging me to go forward with additional feedback, BabyYoda. I like the way this first session is progressing. You’re under no obligation to revise this first writing assignment, but you are welcome and encouraged to.

    Your preliminary grade reflects how well you met the requirements for a first draft on this assignment. You may certainly improve it with revisions if you wish.

    Graded. More feedback available following substantial revisions if requested.

  4. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    PROVISIONALLY GRADED. Grade is on Canvas or will appear soon.
    Revisions (and the regrading that follows) are encouraged but not required.
    RESPONDING to feedback is STRENUOUSLY encouraged.

Leave a comment