We can analyze the criteria based on various characteristics and underlying values to establish a definition or categorical argument about which students should be excused from attending a “Presence Required” class.

Students Automatically Excused

1. Students with disabilities: Those who have documented physical or mental health conditions that affect their ability to attend in person.
2. Those who care for children, the elderly, or family members who require constant assistance.
3. International Students: Students facing travel restrictions or time zone challenges that impact their ability to attend live sessions.
4. Health Concerns: Immunocompromised students or health issues make in-person attendance risky, especially in light of recent global health events.

Shared Characteristics Vulnerability

These students often face circumstances that render them vulnerable, whether due to health, familial obligations, or logistical challenges.

Need for Accommodation

They require accommodations to ensure equitable access to education.

Legitimate Barriers to Attendance

Their situations create legitimate barriers that may hinder their ability to participate in traditional in-person settings.

Categories of Qualifying Students

The qualifying students can belong to several categories, including

1. Individuals with Disabilities: Protected under laws like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
2. Caregivers: Often part of discussions around work-life balance and social responsibilities.
3. International Students: A category that recognizes the diverse backgrounds and global challenges students face.
4. Students with Health Issues: Recognizes the importance of health and safety in educational environments.

Analysis of Results

Examining these categories highlights a commitment to equity in education. Students who fall into these groups face significant barriers that require a re-evaluation of attendance policies.

Underlying Values

1. Equity: The idea that all students should have fair access to education, regardless of their circumstances.
2. Inclusion: Recognizing the diverse needs of students and fostering an environment where everyone can succeed.
3. Compassion: A moral responsibility to consider the personal circumstances of students and provide accommodations that promote well-being.
4. Justice: Ensuring that policies do not disproportionately disadvantage certain groups of students.

Conclusion

To respond to our shared values, the solution lies in implementing flexible attendance policies that recognize and accommodate the needs of students in the identified categories. This approach not only aligns with ethical considerations of fairness but also fosters an inclusive educational environment where all students have the opportunity to thrive, ultimately enriching the learning experience for everyone involved.