Bruinbird’s Proposal

My research paper will be attempting to answer a question that has been bugging me for a good while now ever since I saw the movie “The Greatest Showman.” Why do audiences and critics seem to have such differing opinions on modern movie titles? I believe that it’s because of a self-created barrier between the two in regards to the expectations. These expectations being about different aspects of making a movie, the directing, shots, lighting, script writing, hired cast, and advertisability. I will be looking through various movie reviews over the past decade of movies, looking at where audiences and critics agree, disagree, and to what degree of agreeability they seem to have. I’ll be looking at movie review websites, Rotten Tomatoes and IMDB, to gather large samples of reviews, review scores, and to ensure I don’t have the bias from one singular website clouding the paper. I’ll be using “The Numbers” website to get a fair list of movies to look at for relevant years in regards to the top grossing films. As those to me feel as though they’d be fair comparisons through the years. 

This paper will be about the differing rating criteria between critics and audiences. I believe that critics care more about the perceived “depth” of a film and its message when giving their ratings, while Audiences will give more points towards a film that seeks to entertain, looking more to enjoy themselves than seek a deeper philosophical meaning.

https://www.imdb.com/

https://www.reddit.com/r/flicks/

This entry was posted in BruinBird, GRADED, Proposal+5. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Bruinbird’s Proposal

  1. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    It’s an intriguing topic, for which I am grateful, but it’s not a Hypothesis until you answer the question you asked yourself with more specificity.

    Why do audiences and critics seem to have such differing opinions on modern movie titles? I believe that it’s because of a self-created barrier between the two in regards to the expectations. 

    If by differing opinions you mean that movies critics praise are rarely the most popular with audiences and vice versa, then a simple comparison of Tomatometer reviews will give you plenty of ammunition (but only if you’re fair and don’t “tomato-pick”).

    But . . . those differences aren’t about “expectations” so much as they are about ratings criteria. I look forward to seeing how you describe the basis/bases on which critics and audiences do their scoring.

  2. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    I’m not sure why this post is in Feedback, Please, Bruinbird. I appear to have responded long ago with as much feedback as you should expect from a sketchy Proposal claim and zero sources named or described out of the minimum of 5 that should have been there months ago.

    Beef this bad boy up and I’ll come back to shred it.

Leave a comment