The Influence of Artistic Focus on Technical Skills
in Olympic Ice Skating
In recent years, the world of Olympic figure skating has seen a significant change in how judges score performances, with more focus on artistic expression and less on technical skills. While this has made the sport more visually appealing, it has raised questions about how it affects skaters’ technical abilities. This essay suggests that as the focus on artistry increases, the quality of technical execution is declining since athletes are spending more time on choreography and presentation instead of mastering challenging jumps and spins.
A major part of this change is the International Skating Union’s (ISU) introduction of the International Judging System (IJS) back in 2004. This system created a scoring method that breaks performances into two main parts: the Technical Element Score (TES) and the Program Component Score (PCS) (ISU 2022). The TES looks at the technical skills, focusing on the execution and complexity of jumps and spins, while the PCS highlights artistic elements like interpretation, musicality, choreography, and skating skills. Over time, the PCS has gained more importance, sometimes overshadowing the TES, leading skaters to focus more on artistry than on technical challenges.
The way the IJS is set up has changed how skaters design their routines. With the PCS being such a big factor in overall scores, many skaters choose to spend their efforts perfecting choreographed parts and boosting their artistic performance (Smith, 2022). This shift is largely because getting a higher score in the PCS is often easier compared to the more strict standards for the TES. For example, skaters who are great at artistic expression but include fewer difficult technical elements can still score well, while those with more impressive technical skills but weaker artistic presentation may lose points (Smith, 2022). As a result, some skaters have adopted a safer approach, opting for simpler technical elements to avoid mistakes during tough jumps, like quadruple jumps (Chen, 2023).
Some critics claim that focusing on artistry makes figure skating more appealing to a wider audience, making it more exciting for viewers. They argue that balancing artistry and technical skill makes performances richer and more impactful (Johnson 2021). However, this view misses an important point about figure skating as a competitive sport. While artistic expression is valuable, the sport was originally all about technical skill. By putting artistry first, figure skating might lose its competitive core, as routines shift from showcasing athletic ability to emphasizing performance style.
Adding to this complexity is the issue of judging bias. Although the IJS was created to make scoring clearer and fairer, it can still be influenced by regional preferences. Judges from different countries might have their own ideas about what great artistry looks like, which can affect their PCS scores (Doe,2023). This potential bias shows up in the different ways artistry and technique are valued in various competitions and by different judges. Even though the IJS aims for consistency in judging, there’s still room for interpretation that could favor artistic over technical skills (Doe,2023).
The effects of these changes are clear when we look at recent trends in Olympic figure skating. A review of scoring patterns from the last few years shows that skaters are trying fewer technically difficult moves, especially compared to earlier times. The average number of quadruple jumps attempted in each program has gone down, with skaters choosing safer options to boost their PCS (Chen, 2023). This reflects a wider trend in the sport where the focus on presentation and choreography often takes priority over technical mastery.
In closing, while the growing emphasis on artistic expression has certainly made Olympic figure skating more beautiful to watch, it has also led to a decrease in technical skills. Skaters are focusing more on choreography and presentation to improve their PCS, often at the cost of challenging technical elements like jumps and spins. This shift jeopardizes the very essence of figure skating as a competitive sport, where technical excellence used to be key. To maintain the integrity and competitive nature of the sport, it’s important for organizations like the ISU to rethink how they balance artistry and technical skills in their scoring systems, ensuring both aspects are valued fairly.
References
- (ISU,2022) . Official Judging Guidelines. ISU Handbook. Retrieved from ISU
- (Smith,2022). The Evolution of Figure Skating Scoring. Skate America. Retrieved from Skate America
- (Johnson,2021). How Figure Skating Merged Athleticism and Artistry. The Guardian. Retrieved from The Guardian
- (Doe,2023). Judging Biases in Figure Skating. US Figure Skating. Retrieved from US Figure Skating
- (Chen,2023). Breaking Records with Quad Jumps. NBC News. Retrieved from NBC News
https://www.skateguardblog.com/2020/04/the-evolution-of-technical-merit-and.html
https://olympics.com/en/podcast/podcast-artistry-vs-technical-figure-skating
WHAT ARE YOU DOING NOW!!!!?
You’ve revised this post to MATCH the Rewrite post, which completely defeats the purpose of having two posts that can be compared side by side to appreciate the revisions you’ve made.
I will not REGRADE anything until I have the early drafts of your Definition, Causal, and Rebuttal arguments AND the current versions of your Rewrites of those arguments.
DO NOT DELETE EVERTHING AND START FROM SCRATCH.
DO NOT CREATE NEW VERSIONS OF THESE POSTS.
I need to see the full publication history of these documents as they exist. This material is already very murky and dubious. Any further misunderstandings of the process will leave me no choice but the nuclear option.