Causal Argument-Kingoflizards

The Cause of Trash

The trash that is discarded by human beings is difficult to dispose of properly. People tend to either throw their trash away, recycle it, or just discard it onto the ground, also known as littering. The trash that is littered into nature can often find its way into the ocean, and this creates problems like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is a conglomerate of garbage in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Spanning nearly twice the size of Texas, this heaping vortex of trash is a problematic stain on the Earth, and it is a direct result of human negligence and laziness.

The trash that finds its way to the ocean is swirled slowly by the current, creating a vortex of garbage and plastic pieces. The patch is almost like a aquatic hurricane of pollution. This mass is incalculably large, due to its immeasurable depth.

Plastic is not biodegradable. This means that when the plastic breaks down, it does not dissolve or dissipate into the ocean. The constant crashing of the salty waves, mixed with the direct sunlight that it’s exposed to, the plastic breaks down into tiny splintering pieces of plastic known as Microplastics.

The microplastics are the real problem with the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. The cloud of microplastics in the ocean is causing species of phytoplankton to be without light. The cloud literally blocks out the sun, so the plankton are unable to photosynthesize. The deaths of this many phytoplankton could lead to a serious change in the ecosystem of the ocean, putting nearly all marine life at risk.

Works Cited

New Source: “Ocean Trash: 5.25 Trillion Pieces and Counting, but Big Questions Remain.” National Geographic. National Geographic Society, 24 Mar. 2017. Web. 27 Mar. 2017

Hoshaw, Lindsay. “Afloat in the Ocean, Expanding Islands of Trash.” New York Times. 10 Nov. 2009. Web. 06 Feb. 2017

Marks, Kathy, and Daniel Howden. “The world’s rubbish dump: a garbage tip that stretches from Hawaii to Japan.” Http://agriculturedefensecoalition.org/. N.p., 5 Feb. 2008. Web. 19 Feb. 2016.

Posted in X Archive | 3 Comments

A08: Casual Argument starbucks

Technology Making Us Weak

Today we have so much information available at hand with the use of technology, smart phones, tablets, and much more. With all of the abundant amount of information on the web, people aren’t taking the time to learn and develop solutions for problems because they can just look it up. Many people question if having all of this information at hand is positively or negatively affecting people’s everyday lives. From studies and articles that I have found, I no doubt believe, that not only myself but many people around the world today feel that all of this technological use is affecting the people and lives in our environments.

One of the major negative effects technology is taking a lead on today would be in school settings. Technology in classrooms can lead to many issues due to the overuse of it. Many students learn best through mental and physical interactions with their teachers and classmates. Technology is taking away from this style of teaching because most lessons that are being taught can be done so by a computer. Technology is completely understanding to have in the classroom when it is used as an aid, not as the entire source to the class, which is a major problem in society today.

In an article I read by Erin McCauliff, she talks about the positive and negative effects of calculators being used in classrooms. Although there are pros to this situation, there are so many cons that cannot be fixed unless calculators were ultimately removed from classrooms.

Students are usually at a disadvantage with the use of calculators due to many different reasons. A lot of times students do not comprehend basic skills so they use their calculators as an aid. This is causing children to rely so much on their calculators that later on they will not understand skills that they need in the future. Also, children will feel that they are confident in their classes due to how much they succeed with the use of calculators, but when they are taken away their grades tend to suffer.

Nowadays, face to face interaction and social skills are lacking in people. We as humans spend so much time on our devices that it is distracting us from real conversation. Technology is advancing every day and the more it does, the more attached we become. We are experiencing a decline in normal social behaviors due to these advancements and it is extremely noticeable. In times past, people were able to go an entire day without seeing anyone they know. Although that still happens today, there is probably never a day that goes by without contacting one of our close family members or friends through the use of internet. Only two decades ago, you would have to write a letter to get in contact with someone who lived far away and now it is as simple as pressing a few buttons on a hand held, touch screen device. With the advancements of technology, it makes it as if we are never alone and isolated. Although we may be physically alone at a time, social media gives us the connectedness that we are always able to have with others. This is not a positive factor to technology because it is a healthy thing to sit down and relax by ourselves, but now when we are alone we are constantly using our devices. If we are disconnected from the outside world long enough we will feel the happiness of being alone, but the odds of that happening nowadays are so slim. People feel that they always need to be connected with someone else and that should not be the case. We live more in our devices than in our society. Children are so adapted to coming home from school and playing video games or watching TV that going and playing outside would not even be a thought in their minds.

With the internet today we are able to type anything into a search bar and have thousands of results. But all of the information that we have at hand raises problems. An overload of information can make people feel powerless. Scientists have discovered that multitaskers produce more stress hormones. Too much information can also produce a lack of creativity. It has been found that focus and creativity are connected. Someone thinks of creative ideas when they are able to focus without any intrusion. With too much information at hand people are likely to be less creative because there is not one specific thing to focus on. An overload of information can also make people less productive. With all of the information that we receive from one single search we spend so much time figuring out which sources are best and which ones we want to use that it winds up wasting valuable time that we could have had.

To fix information overload we have to use our own willpower. We can complete tasks so much easier if we just turn off our devices and move them away from us. This is not enough to stop it though because many people cannot fight the urge of checking their device every thirty minutes or so. People hear a notification go off on their phone and the immediate reaction is to check what it is. If we were able to just fight those urges, we would be much more productive and get more done than we would have ever though in our everyday lives.

As evident, there are many positive outcomes that technology has had on society today but the negative ones must stop going unnoticed. It is causing a lack of social skills, isolation, poor sleeping habits, bullying, and so much more. If parents do not start enforcing stricter rules on their children when it comes to how much technology they are allowed to use a day and technology in classrooms being limited, each generation will become more negatively affected.

Works Cited

Nables, Reynoldsburg OH. “Negative Effects of Technology on Society.” Tenn Ink. N.p., n.d. Web. 27 Mar. 2017.

Writer, Leaf Group. “Negative Effects of Using Technology in Today’s Classroom.” Synonym. Synonym, 27 May 2010. Web. 27 Mar. 2017.

“Too Much Information.” The Economist. The Economist Newspaper, 02 July 2011. Web. 27 Mar. 2017.

Posted in starbucks | 1 Comment

Causal Argument—thecommonblackhawk

Pursuing Happiness

While unknown to those outside of the military community, the defeat and belittlement that we faced in boot camp built up a positive mindset within us. While this sounds counterintuitive, some sense may be made of this. From the outside, it would seem as though repetitive belittlement and defeat would initiate a coping mechanism of shutting down and losing touch with our inner emotions. After experiencing the world of basic training, I discovered that just the opposite is true. Those of us who made it through basic training built a strong set of resiliency skills that took us out of the present. Instead of harping on how horrible our lives were, we thought about how great it would be to graduate. We thought about how proud our significant others, parents, and siblings would be when they first saw us in uniform. These thoughts caused an influx of positive emotions that got us through the worst of our situations. A survey I conducted proved that I was not alone with this claim. Out of the 28 soldiers survey, 93% of them agreed that they implicated a method  of deep thought to think about a more positive time.

Sometimes described as a world of hate, there was no escaping harsh criticism and mass punishment while in basic training. 78% of the soldiers surveyed said they thought about quitting due to being punished for someone else’s mistake. This total lack of control and constant failure caused each of us to “dig deep” in a quest to find resiliency skills from within

Very often, we found inner strength by thinking about times in the past that made us happy, or by thinking about seeing family for the first time while in uniform. By thinking these thoughts, we were able to escape the harsh reality we were suffering. These thoughts motivated us and gave us a positive approach in dealing with the now, to be rewarded later. On the contrary, if someone was unable to build or find the resiliency skills required, they would begin to blame others for the tough situation and consistently make excuses. With the military being about getting the job done, it wanted nothing to do with those filled with doubt and excuses. Clearly, two very different approaches result from the very basics of the training environment, yet this is just the beginning.

It may seem strange that it was crucial for us to maintain a positive mindset for the “boot camp” method of training to be successful but Thomas Davis brought some clarity as to why. According to Davis, author of “Effects of Stress, Coping Style, and Confidence on Basic Combat Training,” recruits who were able to positively cope with the situation were less likely to drop out of the training. Along with that, those who had a positive mood were able to respond to different situations faster than those who were negative. I experienced this first hand when I was paired up with a soon to be drop out for the confidence course. The confidence course is all about combining team work with confidence to navigate through some tough and dangerous obstacles. My partner had been negative about his current situation throughout the entirety of training and when it came time for him to perform tasks, he was not mentally there. Being the guy that had to raise me over an 8 foot wall, he failed to find a method of completing the task because instead of problem solving, he was complaining. This was common throughout training but the Army made sure it had no part of it. We are now seeing that this method is not only revealing those who spend their day complaining and doubting, but also those who cannot perform tasks under pressure.

Even with the given evidence, some argue that basic training is successful because it helps the recruit separate themselves from their emotions but with that logic, they would lose their greatest advantage to completing basic training. As stated above, we looked to past memories and future experiences to get through our training. When I was having a tough time, I did not try to cut off my bad feeling because that is near impossible, especially in the basic training environment. Instead, I thought about seeing my girlfriend for the first time in three months, and how proud she would be. These thoughts gave me an adrenaline rush and pushed me through the tough times. A friend of mine in basic had a father who was currently serving in the Army and wanted nothing more than to prove to his dad that he had what it takes. By reaching this emotion, he would wake up with enthusiasm every morning and did whatever required to become a successful soldier.

According to John Bornmann, Author of “Becoming Soldiers:Army Basic Training and the Negotiation of Identity,” boot camp is the first time that many recruits are challenged. These challenges provide the recruits with confidence and pride once they are accomplished. John went on to say that basic training created a sense of social acceptance since everyone was going through the same experience. All of these things I’ve listed are emotions of some type. Finally, while we all have a unique reason for joining the military, we all shared something in common. An incomparable love for the country that we were aiming to serve. This feeling of pride and aspiration is one that guides nearly all of us within the United States Army. So to say that the military’s hostile environment is in place to separate us from our emotions just does not work.

Throughout training, we went to hell and back to earn the coveted title of a United States Soldier. It is a grueling yet rewarding process in which only those who are cut out to be a soldier survive. The military has been successful in producing effective soldiers for years yet little is known about why, yet through my experiences in basic training, the “boot camp” method caused us to find or create strong resiliency skills. This caused us to either find motivation causing us to take on a positive approach, or to find a negative approach to the entire situation. Those of us with a positive mindset found the tools and motivation to get through some of the toughest experiences of our lives.

Works Cited

Bornmann, J. W. (2009). Becoming soldiers: Army basic training and the negotiation of identity (Order No. 3349632). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304880565). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.rowan.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/304880565?accountid=13605

Davis, T. W. (2006). Effects of stress, coping style, and confidence on basic combat training performance, discipline, and attrition (Order No. 3207963). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304960885). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.rowan.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/304960885?accountid=13605

Personal Experience

Posted in X Archive | 5 Comments

Causal Argument—Chippy

SeaWorld Does Not Educate

P1. Going to SeaWorld does not serve any educational value, it is simply a place of entertainment. Why else would the whales and dolphins perform tricks and do flips in front of the audiences? These marine mammals don’t enjoy doing shows, they are forced to. These kinds of tricks are not natural for them to do, hence the reason why you would never see them do it out in the wild. Marine parks such as SeaWorld spread false information to the public to make people think that keeping them in captivity is good.

P2. If you think back to when you were in elementary school, chances are that you went on a field trip to some type of marine park like SeaWorld, or a local aquarium. These trips were funded by the schools and it was a yearly routine to take the students for an educational experience. In the article, “SeaWorld Doesn’t ‘Educate’ Students” written by Zach Affolter, he talks about how some elementary school teachers are arguing that their students do not take any valuable lessons from going to places like SeaWorld. When you bring young children to a place like this they are only focused on the sea animals themselves, not about the facts they are being told. Especially when the sea mammals are performing amazing tricks, that seems to be the only thing students will remember about their trip to SeaWorld. But if they do remember something that one of the orca trainers said, it will most likely be false information. SeaWorld tries to cover up for their wrongdoings by having them convince the audience that things that they have caused are natural and happen to whales everywhere. For example, most whales at SeaWorld have a collapsed dorsal fin due to their confinement and shallow pools. SeaWorld will tell the public that the collapsed dorsal fins are very common in whales and are seen in whales all over the world. This is them lying to the public to try and cover up for their actions. They refuse to tell the truth about their sea mammals because that will result in less people coming to their parks.

P3. SeaWorld makes it seem like the animals are living great lives in these pools because the trainers only talk about positive things during the shows. They do not mention how the whales are being starved and are only getting food during the shows. Instead they tell the audience that whales love to eat the dead fish and that these dead fish are what their diet mainly consists of. The trainers talk about how well the whales interact with one another and how they play and swim together all day long. They do not mention how the whales are isolated most of the time because they fight each other out of stress and irritation. SeaWorld makes it look like living in these pools are the whales natural place to live and that they are actually happy living there. The children do not even know where the natural habitat actually is for most of these animals, they just think it is natural for them to be swimming in these tiny pools for the rest of their lives. By being told all this false information and having them focus on the shows and tricks, they are not learning anything educational about sea animals, which is supposed to be SeaWorld’s whole purpose. This causes children to believe false information and not see a problem with animal captivity. They claim that they have educated over nine million children on the values of conservation, which is a total lie. Going to SeaWorld serves no educational purpose to anyone, instead it is a place for entertainment and lies.

P4. SeaWorld claims that it is a place to educate the public about the lives of sea animals in a way we would never be able to without them. If they say they are more about education than entertainment, then why do they only choose to hold the animals that can perform the most tricks and can be easily trained? In the article, “If SeaWorld Is About Educating The Public, Why Doesn’t It Have Any Porpoises?” by David Kirby he talks about the fact that SeaWorld does not hold any porpoises in any of its parks. Porpoises are members of the dolphin family that can be found off the coasts of many SeaWorld operating states. So if these sea mammals live so close to the parks, then how come we aren’t learning about them in the parks? According to Courtney Vail, campaigns and program manager at Whale and Dolphin Conservation, it is because they don’t have that ‘crowd appeal’ that other sea mammals like the bottle-nose dolphin does. Industries consider porpoises undesirable because they won’t draw in crowds like the massive killer whales do. It might also be because they are shy and less acrobatic, meaning that they can’t really be trained to perform shows. This shows that SeaWorld only chooses animals that will get the biggest audience, because the shows are the number one focus. Also it shows that they do not really care about which animals they do not keep, because they only keep the ones that are going to make the most money for the company.

P5. The only way children can really learn about these sea animals is through research, documentaries, and marine biology. Having them go to SeaWorld to watch whales do flips and dolphins play with a ball serves no educational purpose whatsoever. The only purpose of SeaWorld is the entertainment for us and the way we get this entertainment is by capturing animals and forcing them to live miserable unhealthy lives in isolation. People going to SeaWorld in hopes of an educational experience, such as schools, end up only getting a show that was of no educational value, just entertainment and false information. This causes children to believe what they are told and to keep going back to SeaWorld to see “Shamu do his back flips”. They don’t realize that these sea animals are suffering and they do not learn anything about the way these animals actually live in the wild. Overall, SeaWorld does not educate the public, it merely entertains those who are willing to believe their lies.

Works Cited

Affolter, Zach. “SeaWorld Doesn’t ‘Educate’ Students.” The Dodo. N.p., 21 Oct. 2014. Web. 26 Mar. 2017.

Kirby, David. “If SeaWorld Is About Educating the Public, Why Doesn’t It Have Any Porpoises?” TakePart. N.p., 13 May 2014. Web. 26 Mar. 2017.

Posted in X Archive | 3 Comments

Causal—chancetoremember

Causal Argument

One of the greatest things about the United States is that we have such accessible healthcare.  Over the years former president, Barack Obama, did a wonderful job with the creation of Obamacare, which provides healthcare to millions of individuals all across the country.  Along with Obamacare, another very important form of healthcare that the country provides is called Planned Parenthood.  Although planned parenthood is known mostly for abortions, it provides much more than just that.  In an article on Planned Parenthood written by Jessica Lussenhop, she states that “The clinics also provide many other healthcare services to women, men and children.”  Recently, current President Donald Trump has spoken of defunding Planned Parenthood.  If government spending towards Planned Parenthood came to a stop, millions of men, women, and children would lose many healthcare services.

Currently, Planned Parenthood provides many different healthcare services.  This institution has developed dramatically in an extremely positive way over the last hundred years, and if it keeps it’s funding, Planned Parenthood will continue to grow and expand.  This would lead to even better healthcare for the people of the United States.  Not only do women visit Planned Parenthood, men and teenagers do as well.  For some people, Planned Parenthood is their only form of healthcare.  Fortunately for many Planned Parenthood provides so many services now that some are able to depend on it for their only source of healthcare.  Without Planned Parenthood, these people would be left without any medical services at all.

Unfortunately, most tend to focus on how Planned Parenthood is the highest abortion provider in the United States, but a lot of people forget about all of the other services that Planned Parenthood provides.  In another quote by Lussenhop she states, “In its 2013-2014 report, the organization said while it provided over 327,000 abortions procedures, that amounted to just 3% of its overall services provided.”  While yes, this is true, what people might not know is that this institution also prevents hundreds of thousands of unwanted pregnancies per year.  The goal of Planned Pregnancies is to stop unwanted pregnancies from occurring, so that abortions do not need to be performed.  That is why they provide birth control and sexual education to millions of women and men all over the world.  Without Planned Parenthood here to provide these necessary tools to the public, millions would go without birth control, and thousands of unwanted pregnancies would occur.  Planned Parenthood is vital to preventing abortions in the United States.

While many Americans might think that the goal of Planned Parenthood is to provide abortions, that is the exact opposite of their goal.  Abortions are only performed under Planned Parenthood’s dictation when the woman who is pregnant has a situation that applies to the federal government’s 1977 Hyde Amendment.  Author Danielle Kurtzleben states in her article that, “The 1977 Hyde Amendment dictated that federal Medicaid funds could only be used to fund abortions in cases of rape, incest or to protect the life of the mother. However, some states have expanded cases in which they will provide funds. Currently, 17 states allow funds to be used for “medically necessary” abortions. In those cases that these states count as medically necessary but that are not permitted by the federal guidelines, states cover the cost alone.”  All of this information actually contradicts all of the negative views towards Planned Pregnancy that most people have.  It only provides abortions in very dire measures, which seems to be very reasonable. 

No, abortions are not a pretty thing, but what people need to realize is that they are sometimes necessary.  In some cases, there are such major issues with a pregnancy that it needs to be terminated.  This is very sad and abortions should never be a first option, but sometimes they are the only option.  Planned Parenthood provides this option safely, and with the government’s blessing.  Without Planned Parenthood around to provide abortions in a government approved manner, women are just going to go find other ways to get an abortion, which might not be the best idea. Many women would have to turn to illegal abortions if Planned Parenthood was no longer around, and illegal abortions can be dangerous and life-threatening.  Such a serious medical procedure should be formed by professionals in a safe and clean setting.  Planned Parenthood is here to make sure women get that treatment.

Planned Parenthood has been a trusted healthcare provider for many years, and continues to provide outstanding service to it’s patients.  Lussenhop also states that, “The organization’s earliest roots date back to 1916, when social activist and nurse Margaret Sanger opened the first birth control and family planning centre in Brooklyn, New York, at a time when contraception and abortion were illegal.”  This institution has been a trusted organization for over one hundred years now, and it should continue to stay that way.  Margaret Sanger, the organization’s founder, created Planned Parenthood so that women everywhere would have access to birth control and family planning methods.  She wanted women to be aware of their reproductive system and how it works.  The goal that Sanger had when she created Planned Parenthood was that she never wanted to have to see a woman go through an illegal abortion, or any type of abortion if she could prevent it.  Planned Parenthood was founded on the goal of trying to prevent abortions from happening in the first place.  That is why Sanger wanted women to always have access to birth control, to prevent such things from happening.

In conclusion, it has been established that Planned Parenthood is a key piece of the United State’s healthcare system.  It provides numerous services for American citizens, that would be greatly missed if they were no longer accessible.  While this institution might seem a little unorthodox to those who do not believe in abortion, it is important to look at Planned Parenthood from all angles.  All of the positive qualities that Planned Parenthood has greatly outweigh what could be taken on by some as negative.  Without this well established institution, the United States would be changed for the worse.

Works Cited

Kurtzleben, Danielle. “Fact Check: How Does Planned Parenthood Spend That Government Money?” NPR. NPR, 05 Aug. 2015. Web. 27 Mar. 2017.

Lussenhop, Jessica. “What Is Planned Parenthood?” BBC News. BBC, 25 Sept. 2015. Web. 27 Mar. 2017.

Posted in X Archive | 4 Comments

Survey for Soldiers

Question
1) I felt a wide array of deep emotions throughout training
2) My unit/platoon often failed tasks provided by my drill sergeant
3) I was rarely able to accomplish the given tasks on my own
4) I often second guess my decision of joining when I was being punished for someone else’s problem
5) The long hours of training caused me to lose motivation to complete training
6) Harsh physical conditions led me to lose my motivation to complete training
7) I used deep thought to escape the moment and seek relief from the suffering
8) Deep thought provided me relief from suffering
9) Past memories or future excitement provided me the motivation to finish
Question # Agree Disagree Total Answers % that Agree % that Disagree
1) 25 3 28 89% 11%
2) 27 1 28 96% 4%
3) 19 9 28 68% 32%
4) 24 4 28 86% 14%
5) 19 9 28 68% 32%
6) 21 7 28 75% 25%
7) 26 2 28 93% 7%
8) 26 2 28 93% 7%
9) 27 1 28 96% 4%

The data provided by a survey I conducted provides quite a few conclusions about the mindset of soldiers who have completed basic training. The most important statistic provided is that 96% of soldiers who completed basic training thought about a past experience or future excitement as motivation to complete training. This number is so vital because that relates directly back to my thesis. Along with that, 93% of soldiers who participated in the survey said that they used some sort of deep thought to escape the reality throughout training. Even though 96% of soldiers thought about a happier time as motivation, only 89% of soldiers considered the experience to be an emotional experience. This implies that though most of them used thoughts about their family as motivation, not all of them felt that this caused any emotional feelings. Statement number three was most disagreed with having a 32% disagreement rate. Statement four on the other hand, only had a 14% disagreement rate. This is shocking in that it shows while only 68% of soldiers thought they themselves were having a tough time completing tasks, 86% of soldiers second guessed their decision of joining because they were being punished for someone else’s mistake. This is very important in terms of a soldiers motivation because it can be very difficult to attempt to overcome something that cannot even be fixed. Probably being one of the toughest test for resiliency, soldiers had to find a way to build the motivation to get through training while suffering consequences for mistakes they had not control over.

The data provided to me by these soldiers was a crucial aspect of my thesis. Having these soldiers share their mental experience of training allowed me to find commonalities throughout the mindset of a soldier. This information was so crucial because we all shared a very similar experience. While our drill sergeants and fellow recruits may have been different, the training doctrine was still the same. This provided the perfect environment to question the mental state of those who have successfully completed the training.

Conducted by Colin J Cox

Posted in X Archive | 7 Comments

Causal—aeks123

How Grades Prevent Learning

P1. The traditional grading system, which rates students on a letter scale to measure their learning, is not effective for measuring how well students learn. Not only is the system pointless for college institutions, it can actually prevent students from learning in the grade school and high school level. Most of us agree that there needs to be something in place to measure how well a student learns for teachers, parents, and employers. Alfie Kohn states in “The Case Against GRADES,” that collecting information doesn’t require tests, and sharing that information doesn’t require grades.” In other words, better options are available to share a student’s learning with those who are concerned. The traditional grading system measures how well a student can earn grades based on a teacher’s standards, and hinders them from learning.

P2. Kohn, in the “The Case Against GRADES,” points out that one of the reasons the traditional grading system does not do a good job of encouraging students to learn is that it takes away students’ interest in a given subject. They do not care about the content itself, but rather if the content will show up on their next test or assignment. If we implemented a system other than the traditional grading system, students would be choosing what’s important to learn on different priorities, not just by asking the question, “is this going to be on the test?” The system also prevents students from taking “intellectual risks.” For example, grades can make students take the easy way out when given an assignment. If given the choice to do a project on a topic that the student is familiar with versus a topic that they never heard of before, chances are the student will choose the familiar one in hopes of getting a high grade. Grades are supposed to be a motivation tool, but they only provide motivation for gaining the ability to earn good grades, not learning.

P3. Students know how to work the system when it comes to grades. It is easy for them to quickly pick up on how a teacher grades. With the current system, teachers grade very differently. They can set their own standards and expectations. Most teachers include other factors in their curriculum that have nothing to do with how much a student learns in a subject. For example, students can realize that if they show up to class, are on their best behavior, and show that they are putting in at least some effort, they can earn a good grade without not actually learning much at all. For example, students could possibly earn an A in a social studies class by being loud and aggressive in classroom debates. Or maybe students can earn a A on english paper by figuring out that adding in a lot of quotations in their work will impress their teacher, but the overall quality of the paper isn’t good. Being loud in debates and copying quotations doesn’t show mastery in any academic subject. This teaches students the wrong mindset for the future. If students know how to get good grades, then there is no motivation for learning. After all, parents care only about grades and colleges care only about high GPAs, so why would students care about actually learning if they know how to get good grades? Kohn states that “Grades don’t prepare students for the real world—unless one has in mind a world where interest in learning and quality of thinking are unimportant.”

P4. Although one of the primary purposes of grading is to provide motivation, grades can discourage students, creating a factor that serves as yet another distraction to learning. Being constantly compared to the grades their classmates receive can significantly lower self-esteem. Students who continuously receive low grades may see that as a reason to stop trying, especially if a single low grade ruins their chances of getting a good final grade in the class. Theodore Carey and James Carifio note in “Minimum Grading, Maximum Learning,” that “students who expend high effort and fail will often work to protect their perception of their ability by adopting avoidance strategies. If exerting high effort is seen as a threat to self-worth, exerting low effort becomes a way of preserving it.” So if someone spends a lot of time and effort on an assignment, but receives a low grade, then the chances are low that the same amount of effort will be used on the next assignment. The amount of effort a student gives revolves back to the main problem with grades. If grades were not focused on the ability to receive good grades, then effort would not be as big as an issue.

p5. The only goal for students is to perform well enough in the classroom to get them to the next step in their education. Usually, students do not have a desire to learn information and skills that will help them in the real world, since all they have been taught is the importance to earn good grades.  As stated in “The Case Against GRADES,” “The more students are led to focus on how well they’re doing, the less engaged they tend to be with what they are doing.” Focusing on what grades are earned instead of what is being learned can lead students to have a hard time adjusting. Realizing that grades are not as important as they were said to be, college students now have to be fully engaged in what they are doing, while still having grades in the back of their mind as a distraction.

Works Cited

Carey, Theodore, and James Carifio. “Minimum Grading, Maximum Learning.” Principal Leadership 11.7 (2011): 42-46. Education Full Text (H.W. Wilson). Web. 20 Feb. 2017.

Kohn, Alfie. “The Case Against GRADES.” Educational Leadership 69.3 (2011): 28-33. Educational Administration Abstracts. Web. 6 Feb. 2017.

Posted in X Archive | 6 Comments

Causal Argument – nobinaryneeded

Ignored and Worsened

There are a lot of instances in the United States where mental health issues fall into the hands of young teenagers who have no idea how to handle the situation. The most common mental disorders found in teens are Depression, Social Anxiety Disorder, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Panic Disorder, and Bipolar Disorder. A teenager with any of these disorders left untreated can lead to something more extreme such as self-harm which then leads to an addiction of self-mutilation. Since these are still children who are dealing with these issues, parents come into the picture in a large part, and there is a chance that if kids feel that if their parents were to find out they were harming themselves, their parents would go on a tangent about it. In fear of being scolded and not getting the help they need, the teenager hides their illness and puts on a façade that they are happy, when in reality their life is getting so difficult to deal with that they are considering ending it themselves.

It’s no secret that the stigma on mental health goes back to the time when most millennials parents were born. During the nineteen sixties, seventies, eighties even, mental health wasn’t as engraved in society as it is today. The new generation these days are exposed to far more than their parents were because of the internet and because of this, kids from the tender age of ten and older are exposed to an endless array information to search. This can be both positive and negative. The positive attributes of the way teens can find information is that they can learn about mental illness, find out whether to question if they have it or not, converse with others who have the same illness, and learn ways to cope with it. The negative effects through is that they are able to find ways to hurt themselves. They can find horror stories of parents punishing their children for their self-harming behavior, or even parents adding fuel to the fire and dismissing their child’s illness instead of assisting them in getting the help they need. Doing this both feeds into the stigma on mental health, and worsens the patients disorder.

Addiction plays a large part in mental illness. If the illness is left untreated, people will go to extreme measures to find a way to stop the symptoms themselves. In younger patients, the most common addiction becomes the addiction of self-harm which can be carried out by cutting, burning, or even breaking their own bones. Others become either drug addicts, alcoholics, or even nymphomaniacs. They will take anything to numb the pain they are feeling, or anything to make them feel like they are alive, and not being taken over and controlled by this illness bouncing around in their heads. This kind of behavior can be seen as reckless and irresponsible, which is what most of society would say about someone who abuses these resources, rather than stopping and thinking, “Maybe this person needs help.” Not only does the stigma lead to addiction, but it can also create self-stigmatizing. This is when the patient starts to question whether they have the disorder themselves and discrediting their disorder, which is dangerous.

Let’s say a young teenage girl has been dealing with a lot of issues due to her sexuality. She gets scared, she thinks of what her friends and family have said about the subject over the years, and she decides to stay in the closet. Doing so, she grows depressed, she grows anxious. Then at school she gets bullied physically and emotionally after being outed by a boy who just wanted to have a laugh. This takes a toll on her. She loses friends, and herself, becoming scared and feeling alone. She begins to take a blade to her skin and she doesn’t tell anyone because she doesn’t think her condition is serious enough, though it is growing more serious each and every day. She talks to her friends about it but they dismiss it. The internet is making her think she’s faking her symptoms so she sits back and tells herself that she’ll get over it on her own. She tries to take her own life when they don’t. After that she’s placed in the Adolescent Mental Health Unit for a week and gets diagnosed with depression and for once she feels validated by someone and is getting the help she needs. Though it took way too long to get there.

That is exactly what the stigma is doing. If she could have been honest about what was going on in her head in the first place without a fear of judgement or ridicule, she would have gotten the right help she needed before the self-mutilation or suicide attempt to have someone take her seriously. It should not take someone coming close to taking their own life to get the proper help they need. Not all people with depression, bipolar disorder, OCD, ADHD, etc. want to kill themselves, no but eventually some of them do. This stigma causes death. And it has to be stopped so the patients without doctors can get the doctors they need, the medication they need, the help they need. The mental health movement needs to go forwards, not backwards.

Works Cited

Davey, Graham C.L., Ph.D. “Mental Health & Stigma.” Psychology Today. N.p., 20 Apr. 2013. Web. 26 Mar. 2017.

“Gluck, Samantha. “Stigma and Discrimination: The Effect of Stigma.” Healthyplace. N.p., 29 Dec. 2015. Web. 26 Mar. 2017.

The Effect of Stigma.” See Change. N.p., 29 July 2013. Web. 26 Mar. 2017.

Posted in X Archive | 2 Comments

The Value of Money-starbucks

Nowadays people spend money in many different ways. We are able to spend money by using cash, debit or credit cards, and checks just to name a few. With the expansion of internet use, there are also various ways to spend money electronically. If we were to ask people from different cultures and time periods, we would get multiple different answers to the question, “What is money?” Money has not always been just a small piece of paper, and from listening to the podcasts and reading Milton Friedman’s article, “The Island of Stone Money,” it has become clear to me how much the value, and usage, of money has changed over time.

In the middle of the Pacific Ocean there is a tiny island called Yap. In the first podcast and Milton Friedman’s article entitled, “The Island of Stone Money,” we learn what money was and how it was spent. Many years ago, coins were made of limestone and were transported on boats. These stone discs were not used by the people for everyday purchases; however they would use them in certain situations. Considering that the stones were too heavy to carry they were not used like the way we hand over currency today. On the island of Yap these coins would have an owner, and everyone on the island had a mutual understanding of who that owner was. If the owner used it to pay for something, everyone would know that the money was now owned by someone else.

In the first podcast, a story is told where workers were bringing a stone to Yap on a boat that encountered a storm and the stone fell off into the bottom of the ocean. Everyone in Yap was informed of what happened and accepted the fact that even though no one has seen this piece of stone, it still had an owner. Considering how few people lived on the island of Yap, it was an accepted fact that the person who lost the coin in the ocean should still have any wealth that was associated with that coin. In today’s world however, if you physically lose actual currency, your wealth with that currency is also lost.

In 1933, France feared that the United States would not stick to the gold standard so they did not want it shipped over (Island of Stone Money). Because of this, the Federal Reserve kept the gold in their custody, labeling it as France’s belongings. Because of France’s beliefs of the United States actually putting labels on the gold caused the U.S. dollar to become weaker, leading to the Banking Crisis. This to me was very similar to the story about the stone money in the bottom of the ocean still being someone’s property. In both situations, the money is not seen by either of the owners, but are still trusting that it is theirs.

Years later, Brazil was suffering from extremely high inflation. This was brought upon by reckless overspending within their government. Prices on everyday goods had spiraled out of control and they soon had an inflation rate that was increasing by eighty percent per month. Brazil’s issue with inflation began in the 1950’s when their president at the time decided that he wanted to build a new capital called Brasilia, which was in the middle of the jungle. The government did not have the financial resources at the time; however they printed money to make it appear that they could afford to build the new capital. It was as if they could gain the wealth needed just by printing more currency. This backfired terribly and Brazil experienced inflation for decades. In the podcast, “The Lie That Saved Brazil,” they described to us that a pair of sunglasses was originally ten dollars and six months later they were three-hundred and forty dollars. As the inflation grew over the year, the cost became ten thousand dollars! Inflation eventually became the number one political issue, and needed to be halted. To do so, the finance minister at the time contacted four economists who had been studying Brazil’s inflation for years to help end it once and for all. These four men had the idea that the country had to address the underlying causes of inflation, and stop creating money so quickly. To accomplish this, they said people’s faith in money must be stabilized. Their plan was to have a new currency, one that was not real and would never be printed. So basically people would still have cruzeros but when they got paid it would be in URV’s. By applying these strategic financial principles, Brazil went from being stuck in a financial crisis to the eighth largest economy in the world. Putting a stop to Brazil’s inflation problem is credited to these four economists who were able to trick everyone in Brazil into thinking that this fake currency was real.

Another issue that is seen globally is when there are countries that are trying to make changes that are not understood by other countries. Unlike Brazil’s inflation crisis, Japan has been trying to end twenty years of deflation. The article entitled, “Japan Tries to Ease Fears That Its Policies Will Lead to Currency Wars,” explains to us that they want to put a stop to their deflation, not manipulate the yen. However, this topic is raising concern in other countries of a currency war that could occur from other central banks using similar strategies. It is proven though that if you make people believe in your strategies that almost anything can be achieved.

Also like Brazil’s URV’s, another currency called Bitcoin has been made. Bitcoins are a form of e-money and is kept on a person’s hard drive or somewhere in the internet cloud. It can be sent as a virtual wallet anonymously which is raising a different type of concern. There is already a serious cyber-security concern in our world and sophisticated hackers are a major concern. There are countless reports of hackers wiping out accounts completely, but cyber security measures are combatting that challenge. The Bitcoin system is complicated, but the issues with it seem to becoming less and less, allowing people to rely on something that isn’t even real money.

In the third podcast, “Weekend at Bernanke’s,” the biggest economy in the world is discussed which of course is the United States. Our central bank is the Federal Reserve which is an independent institution and not actually part of the federal government. They are able to generate money whenever they want simply by buying bonds issued by the government. With the bonds, the banks are then able to lend out money which is how it is entered into the economy. Then, in 2007 the financial crisis began. The Federal Reserve had to lend out over one trillion dollars to some of the big companies on Wall Street. Later in 2008, the Federal Reserve would buy more home mortgages hoping to inject a lot of the new money into the economy. At the end of the podcast it is stated that, “From 1993 to 2008, the fed had created 800 billion dollars. In the months after the financial crisis that number nearly tripled to almost 2.4 trillion.”

Today in the United States, our ways of spending money may seem extremely different than those of different cultures and in time past. However, if we think hard enough all of these ways of spending are actually similar in a way. Whether it is the stones from Yap, URV’s, Bitcoins, or credit cards all of these sources of money have no value. In all of these situations we were able to trick ourselves into believing that these currencies have real value.

Works Cited
Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” The Island of Stone Money(1991): 3-7. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
“The Island Of Stone Money.” NPR. NPR, n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
“Japan Tries to Ease Fears That Its Policies Will Lead to Currency Wars.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 25 Jan. 2013. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
“The Lie That Saved Brazil.” This American Life. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
Renaut, Anne. “The Bubble Bursts on E-currency Bitcoin.” Yahoo! News. Yahoo!, 13 Apr. 2013. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
“Weekend At Bernanke’s.” This American Life. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.

Posted in starbucks | 2 Comments

The Value of Money (REVISED) – starbucks

Nowadays people spend money in many different ways. We are able to spend money by using cash, debit or credit cards, and checks just to name a few. With the expansion of internet use, there are also various ways to spend money electronically. If we were to ask people from different cultures and time periods, we would get multiple different answers to the question, “What is money?” Money has not always been just a small piece of paper, and from listening to the podcasts and reading Milton Friedman’s article, “The Island of Stone Money,” it has become clear to me how much the value, and usage, of money has changed over time.
In the middle of the Pacific Ocean there is a tiny island called Yap. In the first podcast and Milton Friedman’s article entitled, “The Island of Stone Money,” we learn what money was and how it was spent. Many years ago, coins were made of limestone and were transported on boats. These stone discs were not used by the people for everyday purchases; however they would use them in certain situations. Considering that the stones were too heavy to carry they were not used like the way we hand over currency today. On the island of Yap these coins would have an owner, and everyone on the island had a mutual understanding of who that owner was. If the owner used it to pay for something, everyone would know that the money was now owned by someone else.
In the first podcast, a story is told where workers were bringing a stone to Yap on a boat that encountered a storm and the stone fell off into the bottom of the ocean. Everyone in Yap was informed of what happened and accepted the fact that even though no one has seen this piece of stone, it still had an owner. Considering how few people lived on the island of Yap, it was an accepted fact that the person who lost the coin in the ocean should still have any wealth that was associated with that coin. In today’s world however, if you physically lose actual currency, your wealth with that currency is also lost.

In 1933, France feared that the United States would not stick to the gold standard so they did not want it shipped over (Island of Stone Money). Because of this, the Federal Reserve kept the gold in their custody, labeling it as France’s belongings. Because of France’s beliefs of the United States actually putting labels on the gold caused the U.S. dollar to become weaker, leading to the Banking Crisis. This to me was very similar to the story about the stone money in the bottom of the ocean still being someone’s property. In both situations, the money is not seen by either of the owners, but are still trusting that it is theirs.
Years later, Brazil was suffering from extremely high inflation. This was brought upon by reckless overspending within their government. Prices on everyday goods had spiraled out of control and they soon had an inflation rate that was increasing by eighty percent per month. Brazil’s issue with inflation began in the 1950’s when their president at the time decided that he wanted to build a new capital called Brasilia, which was in the middle of the jungle. The government did not have the financial resources at the time; however they printed money to make it appear that they could afford to build the new capital. It was as if they could gain the wealth needed just by printing more currency. This backfired terribly and Brazil experienced inflation for decades. In the podcast, “The Lie That Saved Brazil,” they described to us that a pair of sunglasses was originally ten dollars and six months later they were three-hundred and forty dollars. As the inflation grew over the year, the cost became ten thousand dollars! Inflation eventually became the number one political issue, and needed to be halted. To do so, the finance minister at the time contacted four economists who had been studying Brazil’s inflation for years to help end it once and for all. These four men had the idea that the country had to address the underlying causes of inflation, and stop creating money so quickly. To accomplish this, they said people’s faith in money must be stabilized. Their plan was to have a new currency, one that was not real and would never be printed. So basically people would still have cruzeros but when they got paid it would be in URV’s. By applying these strategic financial principles, Brazil went from being stuck in a financial crisis to the eighth largest economy in the world. Putting a stop to Brazil’s inflation problem is credited to these four economists who were able to trick everyone in Brazil into thinking that this fake currency was real.
Another issue that is seen globally is when there are countries that are trying to make changes that are not understood by other countries. Unlike Brazil’s inflation crisis, Japan has been trying to end twenty years of deflation. The article entitled, “Japan Tries to Ease Fears That Its Policies Will Lead to Currency Wars,” explains to us that they want to put a stop to their deflation, not manipulate the yen. However, this topic is raising concern in other countries of a currency war that could occur from other central banks using similar strategies. It is proven though that if you make people believe in your strategies that almost anything can be achieved.
Also like Brazil’s URV’s, another currency called Bitcoin has been made. Bitcoins are a form of e-money and is kept on a person’s hard drive or somewhere in the internet cloud. It can be sent as a virtual wallet anonymously which is raising a different type of concern. There is already a serious cyber-security concern in our world and sophisticated hackers are a major concern. There are countless reports of hackers wiping out accounts completely, but cyber security measures are combatting that challenge. The Bitcoin system is complicated, but the issues with it seem to becoming less and less, allowing people to rely on something that isn’t even real money.
In the third podcast, “Weekend at Bernanke’s,” the biggest economy in the world is discussed which of course is the United States. Our central bank is the Federal Reserve which is an independent institution and not actually part of the federal government. They are able to generate money whenever they want simply by buying bonds issued by the government. With the bonds, the banks are then able to lend out money which is how it is entered into the economy. Then, in 2007 the financial crisis began. The Federal Reserve had to lend out over one trillion dollars to some of the big companies on Wall Street. Later in 2008, the Federal Reserve would buy more home mortgages hoping to inject a lot of the new money into the economy. At the end of the podcast it is stated that, “From 1993 to 2008, the fed had created 800 billion dollars. In the months after the financial crisis that number nearly tripled to almost 2.4 trillion.”
Today in the United States, our ways of spending money may seem extremely different than those of different cultures and in time past. However, if we think hard enough all of these ways of spending are actually similar in a way. Whether it is the stones from Yap, URV’s, Bitcoins, or credit cards all of these sources of money have no value. In all of these situations we were able to trick ourselves into believing that these currencies have real value.

Works Cited
Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” The Island of Stone Money(1991): 3-7. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
“The Island Of Stone Money.” NPR. NPR, n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
“Japan Tries to Ease Fears That Its Policies Will Lead to Currency Wars.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 25 Jan. 2013. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
“The Lie That Saved Brazil.” This American Life. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
Renaut, Anne. “The Bubble Bursts on E-currency Bitcoin.” Yahoo! News. Yahoo!, 13 Apr. 2013. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.
“Weekend At Bernanke’s.” This American Life. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Jan. 2017.

Posted in starbucks | Leave a comment