It seems counterintuitive that the photographers sent to Haiti are being demonized for their photographic evidence of the disaster.
Following the aftermath of an earthquake in Haiti, other instances of violence occurred, particularly the shooting of fifteen year old Fabienne Cherisma. Caught by a bullet fired by police attempting to ward off looters, Fabienne Cherisma devastatingly lost her life. This tragedy was further documented by dispatched photographers from various organizations.
The controversy of the photographs involving Cherisma particularly stems from the notion that such coverage will only last as an exploitative headline, rather than a call to action for others to help in the debilitating aftermath. As such, the various photographers have come to be viewed as dystopian in nature. In such a way that they’re documenting of the aftermath has been villainized.
Though, this begs the question, is what these photographers did truly wrong? These photographers, particularly the ones who documented Cherisma’s death, not only captured the aftermath of the earthquake, yet the humanistic chaos that inherently follows. While possibly morally incorrect, such a photograph encapsulates how one tragedy domino affects others in our society. As such, it was not only the earthquake to be documented, and not only the deaths from said earthquake either, yet the true inherent chaos and brutality following such an event.
You must be logged in to post a comment.