Education vs. Learning: The Difference and Why One Isn’t Enough For Preparedness
When we think of a usual high school day in America, a classic schedule of four core classes and a few exploratory classes like cooking or art comes to mind. This has been the staple for years in order to prepare students for their future whether that be college, trade school, or directly entering some type of job force. Though this format of preparation has been around for some time, it is becoming dated for today’s youth. Many students collectively share the same opinion regarding how prepared they feel for their next steps into adulthood, which is that they don’t feel prepared at all. The popular verdict is that most of the “skills” taught are not useful at all for what the real world has to offer. Knowing complex maths or the in depth details of a historical event is deemed more important than teaching information that will stick with these students for a lifetime. All this equates to just the process of education, but there is no learning happening. Many believe that education and learning can be used interchangeably, but in reality, they have very distinct differences.
According to the official definitions, education is the process in which knowledge, values and skills are passed down at one point in life while learning is defined as acquiring new knowledge, values and skills. This difference can easily be explained through a story of a real high school student. Tiffany Cabrera, a high school senior at the time of the TEDTalk video’s publication, discusses her concern over the education system. Her class was asked a question in government class about political polarization. It made her realize that she and her peers did not know how to respond truly in their own opinion on the subject. This meant that information had just been fed to them and not taught in order for them to form their own ideas. This situation made Tiffany question the current education system. She explains that when we hear the word education, we think of memorizing information for a test and once the test is over, we forget everything. What if we applied knowledge that we were interested in? She believes that this will help us learn not only information, but skills to be active members of society. Instead of making a silly poster project that could be done in 30 minutes, why not take on a bigger project that will actually help us learn?
So it can be said that education gets in the way of our learning. Learning is an ongoing process that begins at birth and ends when we die. A baby is using the learning process when they attempt to crawl or walk just as much as an adult learning how to cook or deal with their finances. Education is only a temporary way of passing down information. When thinking about it, education begins at the age of five and goes to the age of 18 or possibly through someone’s mid twenties if they decide to attend higher education. After that, education ends.
As someone who is currently studying education, we become educators, but we study the process of learning. There are many types of learners and there are three distinct types of learning. Some people learn information/skills visually, others auditorily, and many kinesthetically. It is possible to adopt more than one type of learning, but there is always one type that exceeds the rest. Visual and kinesthetic learning come out on top as the most common and successful ways of learning. By definition, learning is gaining knowledge through experience and physically doing. Education is nothing other than being fed information.
There is a famous “Learning Pyramid” that educators use to dictate how to conduct lessons. It shows the different ways to deliver a lesson and the percentage of retention for those approaches. For example, a lecture only yields a 5% retention rate while having students teach others yields a 90% retention rate of the material. Teaching others material involves the student having a deep understanding of the material in order to relay it to others. The deep understanding comes from picking up the propper skills to learn the material instead of being educated on it. Seeing that 5% of retention comes from lectures shows that this strategy is more education, while having students practice doing or teaching others is learning since the retention rate is so much higher. Teachers can use this to reflect on their lessons and compare what education is going on versus learning.
Through some word investigation, there is a clear difference between education and learning. There is also evidence of many teachers going the education route to teach their students as seen in Tiffany’s video, but we can convince them that education is not the way to go if you want students to retain information and build propper life skills. A large part of a teacher’s life is reflection on oneself. It is time for them and education systems to look at themselves more as learning systems.
S, P. (2011, July 28). Difference Between Education and Learning.
The Learning Pyramid. (2020). Education Corner. (n.d.).
TEDTalk. When School is Counterintuitive. (2017, August 25).
You actually found a source called “When School is Counterintuitive”? 🙂
Yes! It was a perfect find!
BMD, I was thinking of doing an intensive workshop on Introductory Paragraphs because they set the tone for as many as 3000 words that follow and because so many essay squander the opportunity to make important claims in the first 150.
Yours is good. It lays out a thesis (which at this point may still be your Hypothesis, but as always, when writing your arguments you should—and you have—addressed the material as if you have already proved your theory) and puts it into context.
Even so, it can benefit from a stricter adherence to the Promise and Prize method, as I will demonstrate. You may approve or disapprove of the model I offer, but I’d like to have your frank appraisal of it either way.
It’s not necessary to create a “common knowledge” opinion against which to argue, Piano. You don’t have to indict “the popular verdict” or accuse your readers of adhering to “what many believe.” Instead, you can indict the status quo for its failings without blaming anybody for it and let your readers join you in desiring a more thoughtful alternative. That way you avoid alienating readers by criticizing their beliefs.
What do you think?