Causal Argument-a1175

The One-and-Done Rule Degrading College Education

The one-and-done rule became apparent for the NBA in 2005. The reason for this rule was to give high school seniors a chance to mature before entering the pros. Once this rule was implemented, all of the NBA prospects did their first year of college and then went straight to the NBA; not many stayed longer than the minimum year. The NBA teams look for the young, healthy players that they know will flourish for years to come rather than drafting seniors out of college. I understand the idea of wanting the players to mature and get a sense of playing at a higher level of competitive basketball before entering the NBA, but at the same time, there is no benefit of getting a college education for a year, just to go to the NBA and not get a degree out of the college education part. I see benefits only coming from either staying in college for four years to get a degree and then go to the NBA to make a bunch of money or just going straight to the NBA from high school to make a bunch of money and try to get a college degree during their careers. Either way, the player is going to make a crazy amount of money from playing, it’s just a matter of do they want to get a college degree or not. Players can even decide to go get a college degree, than go to the NBA and after they retire, get a job that revolves around the degree they earned and make even more money rather than living off of their NBA salary.  

If you look at it this way, a player can go play college basketball and risk getting a career ending injury before entering the NBA or they can go straight to the NBA and make a bunch of money and risk getting a career ending injury. In “The One-and-Done Dilemma” written by Rachel Stark-Mason, she interviewed Jonathan Bender, the 5th overall pick in the 1999 draft. Bender states “When you’re projected to be a top-10, possibly top-five (pick), you don’t want to sacrifice (it by) going to college at that point, or going anywhere else, because you could get injured or anything else could happen. So you want to take that opportunity when it’s presented.” Players are better off being able to make their own decisions whether they want to go straight to the league or take a year to adjust to playing in a different level of basketball. The one-and-done rule seems to only benefit the players that need a year to mature physically and emotionally and who need their names to get bigger so they can have a chance at a better draft pick. 

In the article, “Why the NBA’s 1-and-done Rule Is Causing More Harm Than Good,” Grant Hughes makes a good point that players have to go through watching their families struggle financially while they are playing college basketball. When the players are in high school, they have the chance to get a job to bring in another source of income for their family. If the players are forced to go to college, they most likely do not have time to work and they are not home and not able to provide money for their family. Going straight to the NBA from high school is giving the players the opportunity to make millions of dollars that can help keep their families in stable living conditions. In another article, “Here’s how much the first pick of the 2018 NBA Draft will make as a rookie,” Tom Huddleston Jr. commented that the first round pick in the 2018 draft was projected to make as much as $8 million dollars. The second pick can make about $6 million, the third pick can make about $5.4 million and even the last pick in the first round can make around $1.3 million. Those salaries are just for playing basketball, not even considering how much more money a player can make with all of their endorsements. If high school seniors know that they are able to make this amount of money as soon as they leave high school, they’re not going to want to waste their time at college for a year where they are risking injury and doing the bare minimum for classes just to make them NBA eligible. A lot of things can happen in a year and if a player’s family is financially struggling, waiting a year to make it to the NBA might be too late. 

The one-and-done rule can give people the impression that it is encouraging players to only look out for their best interest rather than the college teams’. Players are going to college for the one year to do their time so they can move on with their lives. This can affect the team’s overall work ethic. Players could only be looking out for their stats rather than working as a team to bring home a championship for their school. Having players stay on the team for only a year or two can make it hard for the teams to actually have a flow because they are constantly getting newcomers who have never played together before. When athletes play for teams, they are expected to be 100% committed to that team. Mark Emmert, president of the NCAA, makes a good statement in Allen Barra’s article, “Both the NBA and NCAA Want to Keep Athletes in College for Too Long,” saying “if you’re coming to us to be a collegiate athlete, we want you to be a collegiate athlete.” Also, not every college basketball player has the opportunity or wants to make it to the NBA, so it does not benefit them in any way when they are trying to play during their junior or senior year and have new freshmen and sophomores coming and going, not caring about the teams’ overall wellbeing. 

If student athletes decide to take advantage of the college scholarships they are awarded, there is a big benefit. By taking advantage of the scholarship, that means they stay for four years to get their degree. They would be able to come out of college debt free, not having to spend a single dime of their own. Then if they went to the NBA, they could spend their salary on beneficial items for their families. If players decided to get their degree during or after their NBA career, they would still be able to easily afford college and barely make a dent in their bank accounts. Being able to get a college degree is a very remarkable achievement, so the opportunity should not go to waste. The one-and-done rule just seems to degrade the whole idea of getting a college education by showing the NBA prospects that all they have to do is the complete bare minimum to be eligible to play for their college team and eventually make it to the NBA.

References 

One and Done Dilemma.” NCAA. The One-and-Done Dilemma. Rachel Stark-Mason. Fall 2018.

The Harm of One-And-Done.” Bleacher Report. Why the NBA’s 1-and-Done Rule Is Causing More Harm Than Good. Grant Hughes. August 2013. 

NBA Rookie’s Earnings.CNBC. Here’s how much the first pick in the 2018 NBA Draft will make as a rookie. Tom Huddleston Jr. June 2018. 

The NBA Having Players in College.The Atlantic. Both the NBA and the NCAA Want to Keep Athletes in College for Too Long. Allen Barra. April 2012.

This entry was posted in a1175, Causal Draft, Portfolio a1175. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Causal Argument-a1175

  1. davidbdale says:

    A, you do a good job of proving the fairly obvious claim that spending one year in college does not provide much educational benefit for the student athlete. I doubt anybody truly thought it would.

    For readers who are willing to grant you that argument (and that should be most readers), there’s not much else to do while reading your essay than to wonder, “How did this odd and apparently worthless rule come to be?” For this reader, that would have made a more compelling causal argument, one you still have time to consider.

    You don’t say, so you might want to provide a very brief history of the rules before they changed. Did ballplayers have to graduate from college before they entered the league? You leave your readers to wonder. Or, alternately, were they traditionally drafted from college graduates? Then from students who weren’t ready to graduate? Then finally from among high school graduates who never attended college? In other words, did the NBA relax or tighten its academic requirement when it created One-and-Done?

    Does the NCAA have a hand in this mess? Was it to appease them that the NBA made the rule so that colleges could get at least ONE YEAR of play from the most exciting young players before they LOST them to the pros?

    The best way to demonstrate WHY or HOW something happened would be to show who benefits most from the change. Here you’ve spent 1000 words to show it ain’t the student-athlete. So . . . is it the colleges (NCAA)? Or is it the NBA? Because it seems it has to be one or the other.

    What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s