Rebuttal Rewrite-Goat81

Artistic Integrity vs. Athletic Precision: The Balance Debate in Olympic Ice Skating

For years, Olympic figure skating has been caught in a debate over two competing priorities: technical skill and artistic expression. Critics who favor artistry argue that skating is a unique performance sport that blends athletic precision with creative storytelling. Supporters of this position, like fans of Yuna Kim, emphasize that artistry is what distinguishes figure skating from other athletic competitions. As Olympics.com notes, “Kim’s gold-medal-winning routine at the 2010 Olympics achieved a perfect harmony of technical mastery and artistic elegance, captivating fans worldwide” (“Yuna Kim”). However, while artistry enhances the sport’s appeal, prioritizing it alongside technical execution is impractical and undermines figure skating’s competitive integrity. Technical rigor drives innovation, provides a fair scoring system, and ensures the sport remains dynamic and competitive.

Critics of emphasizing technical execution believe that artistry is what makes figure skating special. As Global Art Movements describes, “Artistry elevates figure skating beyond other sports, transforming performances into emotionally engaging experiences” (“Global Art Movements”). For instance, Jason Brown is celebrated for his expressive routines and choreography, which resonate deeply with audiences. Proponents argue that artistry must be equally weighted with technical skills to preserve figure skating’s artistic identity.

This perspective is compelling, as skaters like Yuna Kim and Brown exemplify what a harmonious blend of artistry and technicality can achieve. However, such performances are the exception rather than the norm. The ISU Judging System itself reflects why technical execution inevitably dominates. According to Wikipedia’s ISU Judging System, “Technical elements are assigned fixed point values for difficulty and execution, while program components like artistry are subjectively evaluated” (“ISU Judging System”). This objectivity makes technical mastery easier to assess and justify, while artistic scores rely on interpretation, creating inconsistencies.

The reality is that skaters face immense pressure to excel in both areas, and prioritizing both equally is often unrealistic. For instance, quadruple jumps demand years of intense preparation and conditioning. According to MentalFloss Guide to Scoring, “Quad jumps are so demanding that even experienced skaters risk injuries and burnout when training for them” (“MentalFloss Guide”). At the 2022 Winter Olympics, several skaters who invested significant time in artistic choreography struggled to land these high-risk elements, costing them critical points and podium positions. This highlights a key issue: the effort required to master technical skills often limits the time available for perfecting intricate artistic components.

Nathan Chen’s dominance further underscores the importance of prioritizing technical execution. Chen’s routines are built on pushing the boundaries of what’s technically possible. As Wikipedia’s List of Career Achievements reports, “Nathan Chen’s multiple world records and Olympic gold medal were achieved through unmatched technical feats, including combinations of quadruple jumps” (“List of Career Achievements”). Chen’s success demonstrates that technical rigor is what propels the sport forward, encouraging innovation and inspiring future skaters to expand their abilities.

The ISU Judging System, while claiming to give equal weight to artistry and technical difficulty, unintentionally favors technical programs. “Technical elements are measured through quantifiable metrics like height, rotations, and landings, whereas program components involve subjective artistic scores” (“ISU Judging System”). This imbalance creates a clear disadvantage for skaters like Jason Brown. Despite delivering routines rich in artistry and emotion, Brown often places behind technically stronger skaters. As Prometric Famous Female Skaters explains, “While artistry resonates with fans, it rarely outweighs the measurable precision of technically challenging elements” (“Famous Female Skaters”).

Some critics suggest that judges could counteract this by inflating artistic scores, but this approach would introduce further bias. Awarding higher scores for artistry risks undermining the fairness and credibility of competition because subjective interpretations of artistry vary widely.

Prioritizing artistry also introduces long-term risks for figure skating’s evolution. The sport thrives on athletes who push the boundaries of what’s technically possible, like quadruple or even quintuple jumps. However, if skaters feel pressured to prioritize artistry, they may hold back from attempting groundbreaking elements. As Prometric Famous Female Skaters notes, “Skaters often avoid high-risk technical elements when artistic components are weighed more heavily, limiting progress” (“Famous Female Skaters”). This reluctance threatens the sport’s competitive edge, stifling innovation and reducing the excitement of competition.

Balancing technical mastery and artistry also imposes an unsustainable burden on athletes. According to MentalFloss Guide to Scoring, “The relentless expectation to excel in both areas leads to anxiety, injuries, and early retirements” (“MentalFloss Guide”). Skaters are often torn between prioritizing physically demanding technical elements or creating artistically engaging performances. This pressure can compromise their mental health and performance longevity.

For example, skaters who focus on artistry may struggle to stay competitive when judges reward quantifiable technical skills. On the other hand, skaters who prioritize technique often feel criticized for a lack of emotional depth in their routines. This dilemma reflects the inherent imbalance in trying to weigh technical precision and artistry equally.

The idea of balancing technical skill and artistic expression in figure skating is appealing but unrealistic in competitive settings. While artistry adds emotional resonance to routines, technical execution drives progress, ensures fair judging, and maintains the sport’s integrity. Athletes like Nathan Chen demonstrate that innovation thrives when technical mastery is prioritized. Artistry should continue to play a complementary role, but it cannot hold equal weight with measurable technical achievements. If we want figure skating to remain dynamic, exciting, and fair, technical rigor must remain the foundation of the sport.

References:

https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/55137/guide-scoring-figure-skating-olympicsThis guide explains how figure skating is scored at the Olympics, including the technical and program components scores

https://dev.prometric.com/public-spaces/famous-female-skaters.html This article highlights the achievements of top female skaters who have excelled in both technical precision and artistic expression

https://dev.prometric.com/global-art-movements/ice-skating-couples.html This article delves into the technical elements and artistry behind partnered ice skating

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_career_achievements_by_Nathan_Chen This article details Nathan Chen’s numerous accomplishments, including his world records and Olympic gold medal

https://Olympics.com Yuna Kim: This article highlights Yuna Kim’s Olympic journey, including her gold medal win at the 2010 Vancouver Winter Games

1 Comment

Annotated Bibliography – yardie

The lack of knowledge about diet contributes more significantly to the obesity epidemic in America than the lack of exercise. While physical activity is an important factor in maintaining a healthy weight, the overwhelming commonness of misinformation on nutrition pushed on us by exploiters who want your money plays a crucial role in the rising rates of obesity. 

  1. https://www.vox.com/2018/1/3/16845438/exercise-weight-loss-myth-burn-calories

Background: This article supports the argument that exercise is not the solution to extreme or healthy weight loss. It debunks the myth of exercising to burn calories and not care about what you are necessarily consuming.

How I Used it: I used this article to debunk the idea that exercise is used as a way to counteract food intake. Many people believe that engaging in physical activity primarily serves to burn off the calories consumed through meals, promoting a cycle of guilt and compensation. However, I propose a different perspective that instead of viewing exercise solely as a means of weight maintenance or calorie control, it should be embraced as a holistic practice that enhances overall well-being and mental health.

2. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.atv.0000186208.06964.91

Background: This article titled “Fast Food, Central Nervous System Insulin Resistance, and Obesity” explains the relationship between fast foods and how they affect the human body. The article describes the link between fast food and obesity and how society over the past 30 years has given into the unhealthy lifestyles that are normalized by the food industry now, more than ever.

How I Used it: I used this article to define what insulin resistance is and describe how it works and plays an important role in the issue of obesity. The article provides more factual and statistical evidence that will support my hypothesis.

3. https://www.arianehundt.com/post/what-the-fitness-industry-doesn-t-want-you-to-know

Background: This article titled “What the Fitness Industry Doesn’t Want You to Know”, talks about the skewed belief that exercise is the key to weight loss and that the fix is the eat less and exercise more.

How I Used it: I used this article to show the audience how fitness sources can give harmful advice. Telling people that they need to exercise more and eat less just leaves them miserable, as this process of living will only last so long. It keeps the obese person on a loop, trying more plans, exercise routines, and gyms. When in reality, Americans need to follow a more whole foods diet.

4. https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-the-fitness-industry-gets-rich-doing-nothing/

Background: Titled “How the Fitness Industry Gets Rich Doing Nothing“, this article sheds light on the truth behind gym membership plans, and dietary pills.

How I Used it: This article helped my claim that the gym industry and fitness equipment ads are scams, as they lure obese people looking to lose weight by showing them an easy fix to their problems. Instead of emphasizing a healthier diet, they tell them to buy gym memberships and equipment or dietary pills, which are a fast but temporary fix to the issue. It never truly fixes their problem but instead has them continuously returning and paying more money.

5. https://www.piedmont.org/living-real-change/diet-vs-exercise-for-weight-loss#:~:text=According%20to%20Colleen%20Alrutz%2C%20health,to%20keeping%20the%20weight%20off.

Background: Titled “Diet vs. Exercise for weight loss”, this article supports the hypothesis that diet is more effective than exercise. It explains how both diet and exercise can be used for weight loss success but how it is more effective for a person to make changes in their diet for long-term health.

How I Used it: I used this article to show how both diet and exercise are effective ways of solving the obesity epidemic and living a healthier lifestyle, but that they should be used in different ways. Diet is a long-term way to solve the issue, while exercise should be used for leisure activity, mental health success, or therapy.

6. https://www.webmd.com/obesity/what-obesity-is

Background: Titled “Obesity: Symptoms, Causes, Treatment.” This WebMD article explains obesity as a chronic medical condition where excess body fat negatively impacts health. It’s commonly measured using body mass index (BMI), with a BMI of 30 or higher indicating obesity. Key contributors include genetics, environmental factors, hormonal imbalances, medical conditions, medications, and lifestyle habits like poor diet and lack of exercise. 

How I Used it: I used this article in my definition argument to explain what obesity was. I used the information in this article to put together a definition of what is classified as being obese and how body mass index was used to identify obesity in a person.

7. https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/why-people-become-overweight

Background: Titled “Why People Become Overweight.” This article explores the complex factors contributing to weight gain and obesity, highlighting biological, behavioral, and environmental factors. It goes over genetics and metabolism, lifestyle factors, and medical causes for obesity.

How I Used it: I used this article in my Causal Argument. I took the research done by Harvard Health on how genes can affect a person’s appetite, sense of fullness, and metabolic rate, which are key contributors to weight gain issues. I used the information to educate my readers on how and why a person might be more prone to obesity.

8. https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(23)66356-7/fulltext

Background: This Article by the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition uses real studies comparing two diets taken by individuals with type 2 diabetes. The two diets were a whole-food, plant-based diet and a DASH diet, which is a diet to control hypertension promoted by the U.S Department of Health and Human Services.

How I Used it: I used the data collection in this article in my Causal Argument. To explain the difference between whole foods and what they are, I used the American Journal quote, “Whole foods are rich in fiber, proteins, whole grains, essential nutrients like fruits and vegetables, proteins like eggs, beans, nuts, chicken breast, and fish, and carbohydrates for energy.”

9. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9140.html

Background: Titled “Weight Loss Surgery Is More Effective Than Diet, and Exercise in Helping Severely Obese People Lose Weight.” This article evaluates the efficacy of bariatric surgery for obese people. The RAND study highlights that bariatric surgery is highly effective for sustained weight loss in severely obese individuals, with patients losing 45–65 pounds and maintaining it for up to 10 years. 

How I Used it: I used this article in my Rebuttal Argument as one of the sources I was to refute. This article contradicts my position on obesity, that the lack of knowledge about diet contributes more to the obesity epidemic than anything else. Instead of supporting my hypothesis, this article claims that weight loss surgery, such as Bariatric surgery, is more effective in losing weight. I took the information of how much weight was lost and how long the weight was kept off after having the surgery. I then counter-argued it by explaining how temporary the results were, which supported my hypothesis since it shows that weight loss surgeries aren’t a great solution for long-term health.

10. https://asmbs.org/news_releases/bariatric-surgery-more-effective-and-durable-than-new-obesity-drugs-and-lifestyle-intervention/

Background: Titled “Bariatric Surgery is More Effective and Durable Than New Obesity Drugs and Lifestyle Interventions.” These findings underscore bariatric surgery’s effectiveness and durability in treating severe obesity, surpassing both pharmacological and lifestyle interventions. 

How I Used it: Very similar to my previous article, I also used this article in my rebuttal argument. This article shared information on the different medical options offered to obese persons. I came across two methods called GLP-1 receptor and tirzepatide, which are weight loss medications in the form of injections. Just like the Bariatric surgery, the results after taking these routined shots were temporary, only lasting 4 years. I contradicted this method by explaining how miserable and uncomfortable a person would become if they had to take these injections daily for the rest of their lives. Comparing this to just simply eating a healthier diet makes my argument of whole foods being the solution to obesity more convincing and secure.

11. https://news.cuanschutz.edu/news-stories/cu-anschutz-study-reveals-exercise-is-more-critical-than-diet-to-maintain-weight-loss

Background: Titled, “Study: Exercise Is More Critical Than Diet to Maintain Weight Loss.” This study from the University of Colorado Anschutz Health and Wellness Center indicates that physical activity is more crucial than diet in maintaining significant weight loss. Their findings suggested that sustained physical activity played a vital role in preventing weight regain, highlighting the importance of exercise in long-term weight management strategies.

How I Used it: In addition to the two previous articles, I also used this contradicting article in my rebuttal argument. A study done by the University of Colorado Anschutz claimed that physical activity is what prevents weight regain in a person. They came to this conclusion after experimenting, where two individuals, one having a highly active lifestyle and the other having a more sedentary lifestyle, both consuming high amounts of calories daily. I was then able to refute this by explaining how the person would have to continue their physical regimen every day to maintain their physique. This may be fine for some, but others may not like to be that active, which leads me to say that the best option for all is to eat whole foods which are lower in calories and healthier for the human body. People wouldn’t feel obligated to work off their excess energy, but be more satisfied with a natural amount of physical activity.

Posted in Portfolio Yardie, X Archive, Yardie | 3 Comments

Research Paper: PRblog24

Needs a Title

In simpler terms, expressive writing can be seen as a therapeutic practice, as it is used as a technique the individual can use on their own to relieve stress. Expressive writing encourages self-awareness and the regulation of your emotions. According to a study on college students, those who participated in the practice of expressive writing over a semester reported significant reductions in their stress levels compared to those who did not engage in the practice. College students, especially ones who are early on, are likely to face stressors due to a new environment, new transitions, and newfound anxieties and fears.

Expressive writing is widely compared to and considered a mindfulness practice for mental health. Mindfulness practices focus on processing thoughts independently, without judgment. This is similar to expressive writing as the individual reflects on their emotions and experiences on their own. The article “Mindfulness and Expressive Writing in College Students” found college students who engaged in expressive writing experience had greater psychological benefits than those who did not. This study shows that expressive writing can serve as an accessible tool for college students to address their mental health concerns.

A study published by the University of Valencia, “Mindfulness and diary writing for students stress management“, showed that students who kept a journal for 14 weeks as a part of the mindfulness course reported decreased levels of stress and anxiety. This course allowed the students to process their feelings and expressed the importance of expressive writing each day to prevent stress and anxiety.

Many research studies show the benefits of expressive writing. However, some critics may argue that it is hard to prove how effective it may be due to the number of variables involved. For example, if participants in a study decide to be involved, it may be assumed that these students already practice self-reflection and have an opinion made before the study. In the study conducted by Parker, 2021 the students who participated were psychology students, which may cause some to argue that they already were aware of the benefits due to their background in psychology. However, for many expressive writing works, and if found valuable with positive results, it should be a continued practice.

Expressive writing is a valuable tool and resource for college students seeking mindful practices to reduce their overall stress and anxiety. Regardless of critics who find bias in the selection of each study, the overall evidence suggests that expressive writing has many impactful results that improve mental well-being. Incorporating expressive writing into your everyday routine overall provides an outlet to cope with challenges with stress and anxiety.

Expressive writing is an effective method to reduce stress and anxiety. Despite its proven benefits, some suggest that expressive writing’s impact is limited to the individual, study design, or placebo effect. While stress is a natural human response, becoming aware of solutions, such as expressive writing, can help minimize these feelings for an overall anxiety-reduced lifestyle. 

Nearly 73% of Americans report that their mental health has faced negative repercussions due to stress and anxiety while only 37% believe they have helpful tools to manage these feelings. By addressing common critiques such as variability in outcomes and placebo effects, we can allow for further education on the benefits of expressive writing for stress and anxiety relief. 

Critics argue that most studies done on expressive writing involve small groups, such as college students, making it difficult to apply these results to a larger audience. However, mindfulness techniques such as expressive writing show consistent improvements across many institutions and student populations, incorporating a diverse group of participants. While there is a need for large-scale studies, existing research points to the ability to reduce stress using expressive writing.

Some suggest that the stress-relief benefits of expressive writing are simply a placebo effect. As you expect positive results, you will experience improvement through the expectation, not the process. A case study done in 2021 shows that the practice leads to physiological and emotional changes, such as lowering cortisol levels and improved mood. Expressive writing helps possess emotion and organize thoughts. These effects cannot be intertwined with expectation and the placebo effect. The evidence from this case clearly shows that this process goes beyond the placebo effect, resulting in genuine stress reduction.

Critics will argue that the act of expressive writing is not universal, as its benefits depend on the individual, such as their willingness to write, their personality, etc. However, a study done in 2013 demonstrated that expressive writing is versatile and can be tailored to the individual’s needs. Variability is common in therapeutic approaches and does not lessen its overall efficiency. Expressive writing is an adaptable practice to individual needs and preferences and remains an accessible and effective tool. Although there are doubts and concerns about how the placebo effect and variability in results to expressive writing, they do not diminish the evidence supporting its benefits to stress and anxiety reduction.

Stress often stems from unprocessed thoughts and emotions, which can negatively affect an individual as it can amplify anxiety. Expressive writing provides a structured way to articulate these thoughts, bringing clarity to emotional experiences. A study done by Dirhan and Sarcona found that students who engaged in mindfulness techniques, including expressive writing, reported an improved understanding of their emotions. By translating emotions into words, participants gained a clearer perspective on their stressors, which allowed them to manage their feelings more effectively. The act of writing helps individuals organize chaotic thoughts, making their emotions feel less overwhelming. This clarity reduces stress because students feel more in control of their mental and emotional states.

Self-awareness is a critical element of stress management, as it allows individuals to identify patterns in their behavior. Expressive writing promotes meditation and reflection, helping individuals understand their emotional responses. Studies demonstrated that students who practiced expressive writing reported increased self-awareness, as they were able to identify specific situations or thoughts that triggered their stress and anxiety. Writing regularly allows individuals to observe patterns in their thoughts and emotions, making it easier to address and manage stress triggers proactively.

Bottling up emotions can exacerbate stress and anxiety, leading to physical and emotional health problems. Expressive writing offers a safe and constructive outlet for these emotions, allowing individuals to release tension and process difficult experiences. Expressive writing led to physiological changes, such as reduced cortisol levels (a stress hormone), and improved mood. These measurable outcomes show that writing provides more than temporary relief; it creates lasting emotional benefits. Students who combined expressive writing with mindfulness techniques experienced a significant decrease in emotional distress.

Writing prevents emotions from building up to unmanageable levels. This emotional release reduces stress and contributes to improved mental health. A student struggling with personal issues may use expressive writing to vent their frustrations and fears, reducing their emotional responsibility and improving their mental state.

One of the key advantages of expressive writing is its accessibility. Unlike therapies or stress-reduction methods, expressive writing is a free, low-risk practice that anyone can use. Research by Dirhan and Sarcona highlighted the practicality of expressive writing as part of a mindfulness curriculum, highlighting its effectiveness even when practiced in brief, structured sessions. Expressive writing is easy to incorporate into daily routines, it is an ideal stress-management tool for busy college students who may lack the time or resources for formal therapy. A student can spend 10-15 minutes each day writing about their thoughts and feelings, creating a manageable habit that significantly reduces their stress over time.

Stress and anxiety are major challenges for college students, negatively impacting their mental health, academic performance, and overall quality of life. Expressive writing has emerged as a reliable, accessible, and effective tool to reduce stress by promoting emotional clarity, fostering self-awareness, and providing a healthy outlet for negative emotions Current research supports the causal link between expressive writing and stress reduction. As a practical and adaptable technique, expressive writing has the potential to empower students with the tools they need to manage their stress and improve their overall well-being.

References 

Dirhan, D., & Sarcona, A. (2023, November 21). Students’ self-perceptions of mindfulness after learning mindfulness techniques in a professional skills course. 7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’21). https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/171742 

Mohamed, N. (2021, May 30)  Effects of self-expressive writing as a therapeutic method to relieve stress among university students. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08893675.2023.2174678?scroll=top&needAccess=true

Poon, A. (2013) Effect of Brief Mindfulness Meditation on Expressive Writing.  State University of New York at Albany ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,  2013. https://www.proquest.com/openview/fbc4ed6038dbf17d4b90a7f38017e06b/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

Posted in Portfolio PRBlog, PRblog24, Research Position Paper | Leave a comment

Reflective – Mongoose449

Core Value 1. My work demonstrates that I used a variety of social and interactive practices that involve recursive stages of exploration, discovery, conceptualization, and development.

The definition argument is entirely based on conceptualization and the development of how I wanted the reader to understand what I am attempting to say. It is an ease in, yet also attempting to tell you the conundrum of what I am attempting to answer. Obviously I want to have them agree with me, but they can’t begin to agree unless they can understand the scale of the answer I am giving, and explaining here why I have that answer. My answer is a simple one, but if told it sounds insane, but when the explanation is told beforehand the reader may be more receptive to understanding why. I attempt to make an unanswerable question answerable, while convincing them why this answer will work.

Core Value 2. My work demonstrates that I read critically, and that I placed texts into conversation with one another to create meaning by synthesizing ideas from various discourse communities. 

I believe that the visual rewrite fits this one best, considering I dissect the advertisement and form a hypothesis based on my own interpretation. I found the idea very interesting, especially because of how you both have to describe the ad without sound, but also then attempt to explain a narrative that you yourself do not know. It was an interesting, very handy way of learning. I made me not only watch something more critically than I would normally do, but then also attempt to convey the meaning of something in the advertisement in only words.

Core Value 3. My work demonstrates that I rhetorically analyzed the purpose, audience, and contexts of my own writing and other texts and visual arguments.

The work to write about an advertisement, solely based on imagery rather than sound was an interesting assignment. It took some time to be able to first choose an advertisement that I found good enough for what was at hand, and hadn’t read the title or description of the ad before writing about it. After the first submission, it took some time to fully understand the rhetoric aspect. I used my descriptions of the scenes to paint the picture in my own head, to then analyze and depict what I saw when watching the advertisement. It went from a slideshow to a narrative, one that could be followed rather then just seen in screenshots.

Core Value 4: My work demonstrates that I have met the expectations of academic writing by locating, evaluating, and incorporating illustrations and evidence to support my own ideas and interpretations.

The whole concept of the Causal argument to me was to try and correlate something known, to something unknown. I use the historical aspects of both caves, and a French fortress to try and explain this. A fair amount of people know about the First World war and the fighting that occurred, so connecting the famous Battle of Verdun to my argument could help with understanding. I use the fortress as a placeholder for something manmade and impenetrable, yet traps the occupant in an unlivable situation.

Core Value 5. My work demonstrates that I respect my ethical responsibility to represent complex ideas fairly and to the sources of my information with appropriate citation. 

One of the few posts that I directly reference some source material that I used, not just pick them apart and using the information I learn to then explain in my own terms. I found that it was easier to reference much more open the ideas and concept I was explaining by using examples of things, like Fort Vaux or Caves. Rather than using the concept or psychology of humans to form the basis of my argument, it is more easily understood when a very simple idea is shown to correlate to the more complex.

I believe that I heavily benefited from this class, especially in the department of improving my own concept of writing. I found that throughout the course, not only did I provoke the thought of finding a hypothesis I can then argue about, but to then write and attempt to persuade somebody was new to me. Previously I’ve never had to convince somebody to agree with me in an essay format, but I found that it gave me much more insight into the mind and thinking that somebody would have. It both told me that you can’t win every battle, and also that convincing somebody is less about how much evidence you have, and more how you can use your evidence to sound more convincing than the opposition. It gave me a new perspective into writing, to see that everything can and most likely is an argument, just for varying degrees of importance and relevancy. If I could I would choose to take the class again, and would recommend it for all solely just because of the advice given. I feel like I could have maybe done just a bit more in some fields, especially on improving my own vocabulary, but besides that I believe that I have improved over the course to effectively edit and understand what I write.

Posted in GRADED, Mongoose, Reflective | 1 Comment

Reflective – yardie

Core Value 1. My work demonstrates that I used a variety of social and interactive practices that involve recursive stages of exploration, discovery, conceptualization, and development.

The work that best demonstrates this core value would be my Definition—yardie post. Being the first argument that I wrote, it was harder to get an idea of how to construct an argumentative paper. I had to learn how to grab a reader’s attention and keep them hooked on my thesis. After posting my first draft and getting feedback from both my professor and classmates, I realized how confusing and boring my first draft sounded. I had to become a more straightforward writer and not hinder the main idea from the readers just to fill up my essay. I was then able to write more effectively in the next few arguments, where I started paragraphs with more enticing headers that could be controversial and get a reader interested.

Core Value 2. My work demonstrates that I read critically, and that I placed texts into conversation with one another to create meaning by synthesizing ideas from various discourse communities. 

The work that best demonstrates this core value would be my Causal Argument – yardie post. In this argument, I created four causes of the obesity epidemic. These causes were awareness, understanding, belief, and action. These broad words allowed for plenty of conversation to be discussed in each cause. I included reasonings and research to support each word to get readers to understand the bigger issues of obesity. Bigger issues, like how the lack of belief is subtly created by society and how we secretly sabotage ourselves with misinformation. For example, I included scientific research done by the CDC, to explain and support the awareness part of my argument. “Science has found that several biological, environmental, and behavioral factors control obesitỵ Studies from Harvard Health shows that genes in a person can affect their appetite, sense of fullness, metabolic rate, and food cravings. Furthermore, the CDC reported that Americans now are consuming 300 more calories a day than the average person 60 years ago.” This explains what I mean by using awareness as a contributing cause of the obesity epidemic.

Core Value 3. My work demonstrates that I rhetorically analyzed the purpose, audience, and contexts of my own writing and other texts and visual arguments.

The work that best demonstrates this core value would be my Research – yardie post. In my 3000-word research paper, I finalized each of my previous three argumentative essays into one. This writing piece shows the purpose of my hypothesis and how I choose to inform about and solve the issues of obesity. I was most confident in my idea of using relatable scenarios where the audience could agree or understand my hypothesis. “The truth is Americans don’t want to give up their Burger King’s Triple Whopper with Cheese, or the Ben and Jerry’s ice cream at 2 am, and the bottomless all-you-can-eat fries, wings, and sodas at their favorite restaurants.” “People are constantly exposed to the algorithms and expectations of having a healthy lifestyle, where social media displays the enticing lifestyles of thin, active, and healthy celebrities.” I choose to write these quotes to influence feelings and connections in the reader.

Core Value 4: My work demonstrates that I have met the expectations of academic writing by locating, evaluating, and incorporating illustrations and evidence to support my own ideas and interpretations.

This core value can be seen through my Purposeful Summary- yardie post. I believe this assignment was one of the best followed by myself. I met all the expectations and included evidence that supported my text. I was able to locate and evaluate the article used to write the research summary on the 14-year-old Fabienne Charisma. My writing flowed well together and expressed my ideas on the devasting story of the young girl. Based on the tone of my purposeful summary, a reader could tell where I stood or how I felt about the story. I included descriptive language that supported the illustrations of the story, allowing readers to better understand where and what happened. In conclusion, I was most proud of this work since it demonstrated all the met expectations. My grade was an A, and no revisions were suggested.

Core Value 5. My work demonstrates that I respect my ethical responsibility to represent complex ideas fairly and to the sources of my information with appropriate citation. 

This core value can be seen in my Rebuttal Argument Rewrite – yardie post. In this assignment, we were to discuss other complex ideas that went against our argument. I embraced this challenge by fairly representing the counterarguments and addressing them respectfully, ensuring my analysis was both thoughtful and balanced. My primary argument focused on the idea that adopting a whole foods diet is a more effective and sustainable approach to weight management compared to quick fixes such as exercise or medical interventions like injections. I then researched the best articles of rebuttals that advocated for these. opposing viewpoints; I included their studies and data on how exercise and medical injections were the better solution to weight loss. I respectfully refuted both of these claims using factual evidence and statistics.

Posted in GRADED, Portfolio Yardie, Reflective, Yardie | 2 Comments

Rebuttal Argument Rewrite – yardie

Does eating a whole foods diet and having self-control with food matter when there are easy-to-take weight loss pills, surgeries, gyms, and other quick fixes? Contrary to my argument that the lack of knowledge about healthy eating habits contributes more significantly to the obesity epidemic in America than the lack of exercise, or fast remedies society has discovered, many people have expressed opinions of ‘emphasizing the importance of exercise’ or ‘Pushing the idea of weight loss procedures and pills.’ 

According to the ASMBS, a society for metabolic and bariatric weight loss surgery; they state that bariatric surgery is more effective and durable then obesity drugs and lifestyle interventions. Researchers for the ASMBS found that lifestyle interventions such as dieting and exercise resulted in an average weight loss of 7.4% that eventually was generally regained within 4.1 years. They claimed that their procedures resulted in 10.6 – 21.1 % weight loss. While this way of becoming skinny may be appealing given the fast results and lazy- friendly process, it isn’t at all sustainable or a smart choice to make. 

Becoming victim to these procedures, named, tirzepatide or GLP – 1 semaglutide means months of weekly injections, and on estimate, a cost of 1,000 dollars a month. This approach not only drains wallets but also locks an individual into a cycle of dependency on medication. And for what? Once you have finally had enough of these weekly tortures, it is said that about half the lost weight will return within a year. Knowing this, it truly doesn’t make a difference in the amount of weight you lose and how long it stays off. Clearly if you stop eating right, you will regain unhealthy weight. And if you stop taking these injections, you will also regain the unhealthy weight. 

This comes down to whether the process of injections is more beneficial and morally ethical for you as a human being. Humans weren’t designed to live a life of painful injections forever, but instead to simply eat a balanced diet. In addition to this, eating well fosters a sense of self-control and accountability that quick fixes can’t provide. It’s about building habits and learning how to listen to your body. It’s important to know when you’re hungry and when you’re full. These are skills that stick with you for life, unlike procedures or pills that just cover over the problem without facing its root cause. 

Some sources say that while diet may be helpful for weight loss, the real and more effective method is exercise. It is often glorified when we see people partaking in exercise and gym activities Americans are fooled, believing that the solution for health and weight management i getting in the gym. This cultural practice is fueled by the fitness industry, which emphasizes physical transformation and gym memberships as markers of success. Social media platforms are permeated with images of toned bodies and workout routines. This influences others to think hat exercise alone is the key to achieving health and aesthetics. 

A study done by the University of Colorado Anschutz claimed that exercise was more critical than diet when maintaining weight loss. The study included two groups, one with successful weight loss maintainers with high levels of physical activity and the other group being unsuccessful weight-loss maintainers with little to no physical activity. “The findings reveal that successful weight-loss maintainers rely on physical activity to remain in energy balance, rather than chronic restriction of dietary intake, to avoid weight regain.” “Our findings suggest that this group of successful weight-loss maintainers are consuming a similar number of calories per day as individuals with overweight and obesity but appear to avoid weight regain by compensating for this with high levels of physical activity,” said Victoria A. Catenacci, MD, a weight management physician and researcher at CU Anschutz Medical Campus.

While it may be true that exercise plays a significant role in overall health, the notion that exercise is more critical than diet in managing weight loss is misleading. This narrative by the University of Colorado Anschutz creates an incomplete picture of what it truly takes to achieve and maintain a healthy lifestyle. Numerous studies highlight that diet accounts for about 80% of weight loss results, with exercise contributing a much smaller fraction. For instance, you’d have to run nearly an hour to burn off the calories in a single fast-food meal, but simply choosing a healthier, lower-calorie meal in the first place would eliminate the need for that hour-long run. Glorifying gym culture creates a distorted view of health by prioritizing aesthetics over sustainability. While it’s inspiring to see people dedicate themselves to fitness, relying on exercise alone often leads to burnout or discouragement because it’s hard to out-exercise a poor diet. The cycle of overindulging in unhealthy foods and attempting to “work it off” in the gym can be both physically and emotionally exhausting. 

This comes back to the cycle of gaining weight, wanting to lose weight, and then becoming victim to unrealistic solutions. These solutions are put in place to make the rich man richer. America has always been a country run by money, so it is no surprise that doctors who own weight loss remedies, gym franchises, and fast-food industries promote false narratives to trap easily influenced zombies into their money lure. 

The real issue lies in education. People aren’t obese because there’s a lack of gyms or weight-loss pills; they’re obese because they’ve never been taught how to eat right. Diet culture bombards us with conflicting advice, while fast food is marketed as cheap and convenient. Society glorifies these quick fixes without addressing the simple truth: without the knowledge and discipline to sustain healthy habits, no surgery, injection, or newly trending diet will keep the weight off for good. Ultimately, the choice comes down to what’s more beneficial and ethical for us. Humans weren’t designed to rely on needles or scalpels to manage their weight. Instead, we thrive when we nourish ourselves with real food and move our bodies in natural ways that are not forced.

References

Posted in Rebuttal Rewrite, Yardie | 2 Comments

Reflective – Who’s On First?

Core Value 1. My work demonstrates that I used a variety of social and interactive practices that involve recursive stages of exploration, discovery, conceptualization, and development.

I demonstrated this core value of exploring the ideas in my work and revisiting to develop it better. My whole thesis has been a work in progress since the beginning of the year. My thesis looks at the role of familiarity when it comes to preference of music choice. Over time it has changed from comparing it to food to animals to babies. This has been because of a long process in which I am able to look at my work over and over again, to take lectures into consideration as well as small grammar lessons. I have been able to continue to discover and develop my paper. Therefore, the work that best cumulates this core value is my research paper

Core Value 2. My work demonstrates that I read critically, and that I placed texts into conversation with one another to create meaning by synthesizing ideas from various discourse communities. 

This class inspired me to think in a way none of my other classes have taught me. We looked at situations from all directions and analyzed them critically. For example, we talked about the Challenger explosion and talked about how while the O-rings were the cause of the explosion, NASA wouldn’t have launched the rocket in the first place had it not been for the media pressure resting on the launch for carrying teacher Christa McAuliffe. This idea of looking around not just for the apparent cause of something but investigating the whole of an argument to find all sides. This was shown in my Causal Rewrite wherein I explore different ways of looking at familiarity, from food to animals to babies and how that transfers to music choice.

Core Value 3. My work demonstrates that I rhetorically analyzed the purpose, audience, and contexts of my own writing and other texts and visual arguments.

Although you may have the best argument in the world written for the highest class researchers and intellectuals, if your audience is a bunch of 7 year olds, you’re not going to be very convincing. We explored this idea of writing to a particular audience in our assignment Elevator Instructions, wherein we wrote as if to an elevator. Through this exercise I learned that in order to fully convince your audience of something you must understand them completely. You have to think of what they want and the ways they might refute your argument in advance. For example, in this assignment, you couldn’t just say wait until all the people who want to get on get on because how is the elevator going to know who wants to get on? You have to write what the elevator understands, which is time and sensors etc.

Core Value 4: My work demonstrates that I have met the expectations of academic writing by locating, evaluating, and incorporating illustrations and evidence to support my own ideas and interpretations.

This core value is seen in my Visual Argument assignment. In this assignment we had to do where we described every single detail, seen or assumed about an advertisement. It required us to use and develop our locating and evaluating and interpreting skills. You could not just assume that some details did not matter, nor that the audience would assume the same assumptions as you given the same information. This assignment made me realize that there is so much that goes into every second of a film. It also made me realize how many assumptions we make over the most basic everyday scenes. Doing this assignment was long and tedious but I am glad I did so because it gave me a greater understanding of what it meant to scrutinize one’s work down to the last detail.

Core Value 5. My work demonstrates that I respect my ethical responsibility to represent complex ideas fairly and to the sources of my information with appropriate citation. 

My definition argument best shows my understanding of my ethical responsibility in representing complex ideas fairly. Out of my three parts of the research paper, my definition argument definitely had the most sources. I made sure to appropriately cite all of these papers and to summarize them in my own words so as not to take a quote out of context for my own selfish uses. I think this is a vital part of people’s ethical responsibilities, although you may be quoting them directly, you can take an entirely different meaning from the article and mislead your audience into believing something that never existed. My work demonstrates that I read each of the articles and fairly cited them so that my ethics are still standing and I was able to convey complex ideas.

Posted in GRADED, Portfolio Who'sOnFirst?, Reflective, Who'sOnFirst? | 1 Comment

Bibliography – Mongoose449

Edward, S. (2023, December 18). How our ancient ancestors used caves. Stump Cross Caverns – A Fun Family Day Out in Yorkshire. https://www.stumpcrosscaverns.co.uk/how-our-ancient-ancestors-used-caves

Background: A rather strange source, from the stump cross caverns website, in Yorkshire. It’s a website dedicated to said Stump Cross Caverns, which is a tourist attraction dedicated around caves. While a strange source, the caves themselves are a preserved cavern system that hadn’t been touched by humans. It serves as a good reference for how caves had been and could’ve been used.

How I used it: I used it mainly in my Causal Argument, giving myself a rather broad yet expansive usage in how caves have served humanity during antiquity. It helped to sort of detoxify myself from other cave information, and use previous information I know about exploring caves or maybe even mining information. It served to ground myself in the idea of Humans living or using caves as tools, rather than actual locations that exist without humans. The point was to give general information so I could begin to explain my point.

From old to new: How the English language evolved throughout history: UT Permian Basin Online. UTPB. (2023, April 4). https://online.utpb.edu/about-us/articles/humanities/from-old-to-new-how-the-english-language-evolved-throughout-history

Background: An article from another university, which goes over the concepts of how language has evolved over the times. Even in recent history and how words go out of fashion or are twisted into completely new ones. It gives some background information about how English naturally evolved, then explained a point in time where it drastically changed in an unknown direction due to outside forces, specifically Norman conquerors.

How I used it: I used the article as a good way to introduce a historical example in my writing. It serves as not only a reference point for the average reader to understand my argument, but also as an idea in their heads. A foundational part of a culture that changes overtime, morphing into something new. English is a great example to show how this happens, and that language and writing are not something that will last for a long period of time.

How stories change over time. How Stories Change Over Time | New York City Center. (n.d.). https://www.nycitycenter.org/education/study-guides/once-upon-a-mattress-behind-the-curtain-guide/how-stories-change-over-time/

Background: The article is based on a story published in 1835, which is an anthology of several fairy tales. Though unlike many modern fairytales, this one has its message be much more obscure rather than completely out there. The moral is not easily found, which has led itself to be adapted in a multitude of different ways to mean different things. The point is that things will nevertheless twist and turn throughout time, and that even a more obscure meaning can turn into something vastly different, especially when interpreted by people, for others to consume.

How I used it: I used it much like the article above, just in a much more different manner. I used this to give myself another reference, yet in a more abstract way. The article provides a change that has no natural evolution, just the way humans will change the source material of something. Be it changing the story entirely to fit characters that didn’t exist previously, or to fit a form of content that it wasn’t intended to fill. I use it to give myself both an answer to a question and a basis in which I formed my own solution to the problem I discuss.

Licht, K. de F. (2017, December 13). Hostile Urban Architecture: A critical discussion of the seemingly offensive art of keeping people away. research.chalmers.se. https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/253746

Background: A very in depth article about hostile infrastructure. It goes in to great depths about the concepts in how hostile infrastructure works, the ideas then behind it, and also the consequences that they hold for not only those it is attempting to fight against. It uses both examples to show the ideas, which then relates to how the people and society the infrastructure is in is reflected upon by it.

How I used it: I used it much more so as an answer to a solution that I thought of earlier on. The whole idea of keeping this pandoras box from somebody is one with many solutions. Yet what better than an area to hold our in seen killer than terrain covered in hostility? But this article more so quelled that idea, booby traps will eventually fail, and an area designed to exterminate anything that encroaches is rather counterintuitive to the concept of keeping danger away from our future selves. It gave me the idea that even if I keep our danger away from the future, using something that negatively affects everyone as long as it is hidden, is not the best of ideas.

Magazine, S. (2022, March 8). How much medieval literature has been lost over the centuries?. Smithsonian.com. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-much-medieval-literature-has-been-lost-over-the-centuries-180979696/

Background: A Smithsonian magazine that goes over how much literature has been lost. It uses many examples of currently known literature from the time period, and then identifies how much is estimated to be lost. It uses the idea of how information is distributed to come to the conclusion of lost ideas, especially those where people either are good at or bad at preserving their own history through this saved literature.

How I used it: I used it as a point of arguing. While I am a very large fan of history, I see the merit in losing things like this especially because of the point I attempted to make. I use this as an argument in how forgetting something will lead to us never asking what something may be. As human in the modern day, we wonder what we have lost since time has past, yet we never really wonder what exactly we lost. I use this to then explain how forgetting about this dangerous object, buried extremely deep underground, will eventually lead to us never having to worry or be curious of something. It creates a void in knowledge so large that the void is not acknowledged, solely because it is known that nothing is there, even if there was truly something there in the past.

Martinez-Conde, S., & Macknik, S. L. (2024, February 20). How the color red influences our behavior. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-the-color-red-influences-our-behavior

Background: A dissection on the color red. It explains the psychological connotation the color carries, especially in how humans recognize the color. It is an eye catcher, it draws the attention, it warns of danger, or even of pain. The color can mean many things, yet we are naturally drawn to it just by its presence.

How I used it: I use it much less than the article right after this, but still one in the same. It serves as a psychological reference in my decision making. Attempting to answer for somebody in the future is an impossible task, yet if I can pull apart the decision making to answer based on known variables, I could make a presumable answer. Obviously attempting to correlate the color of something with an expected action is practically impossible, it gave me the foothold to then find the next sources that I could possible use.

Mobbs, D., Adolphs, R., Fanselow, M. S., Barrett, L. F., LeDoux, J. E., Ressler, K., Tye, K. M., & Neuroscience, N. (2024, February 20). On the nature of fear. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/on-the-nature-of-fear

Background: The article explores the concept of fear in humans and answering questions about it. It gives insights into the biological and psychological aspects of fear on a deeper level. It explores the role that fear has in humans, and how the human brain response to threats to survive.

How I used it: I used it much less than expected, especially because it was one of the first sources I grabbed in the starting stage. Yet, I based much of my hypothesis and idea based on it. The whole concept is one surrounding human psyche, and trying to answer an unanswerable question. Its difficult to grasp the idea of how a human process information, and I used the article to give myself some sort of insight on a more primal level. It serves to give me a small idea in how people will function based on an instinctual level, especially because I’m trying to solve a problem that I made. While you can’t communicate to these humans in the future, you can more than bet that they have the same instincts humans have had since time immemorable.

Sapiens. (2022, November 29). Why symbols aren’t forever. SAPIENS. https://www.sapiens.org/culture/symbols-shifting-culture/

Background: A very on the nose article, discussing the change in symbolism as the times change. Either using direct symbols, especially of Nazi imagery and how the meanings will change based on who would use them. Its especially overt in how the swastika was one of well-being, luck even, and how a single power would change its iconography forever. The change in symbol, its meaning, is hard for people. It may take years for the idea of something to change, or a moment for it to shift.

How I used it: Besides a direct quote from the article in my writing, I use the article to both reference the idea of symbols and change, and also how a symbol is a terrible way to communicate. Symbols serve to convey meaning, yet without either knowing of that meaning, or a change in that meaning, a symbol will have a different meaning. If you were shown a temple in Asia with a swastika, you would be repulsed. Yet when the locals see it, their meaning is that of the original one, not of one most westerners associate with it. A testament to both the preservation of symbols and the change of them.

Storage and disposal of radioactive waste. World Nuclear Association. (n.d.). https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-waste/storage-and-disposal-of-radioactive-waste

Background: The article describes how nuclear countries around the world effectively store and dispose of their waste product. It explores the multiple different ways nuclear waste can be safely hidden away to slowly decay in peace. It also digs a little deeper into historical and current ways nuclear waste has been stored, and does a very good job in giving an in-depth look into how these solutions keep the waste safe. It also goes into some ideas into how we could store waste in the future.

How I used it: I reference the article in discussing how nuclear waste is stored. It served as an excellent refresher of my own knowledge in how the waste in stored, so that I could effectively explain how my idea may work, or just how storage in the modern day functions, yet may not function in the future. I go into how many steps they go to keep the fuel from being accessed, and then talk about how this could be a double-edged sword, especially in communicating what may be inside.

Wikimedia Foundation. (2024, October 30). Cave dweller. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_dweller

Background: A very brief explanation about how humans used to live in cave. As a Wikipedia article, its not exactly the most in-depth article, but it does the job in explaining both living arrangements, along with usages. It serves to give brief ideas about the topic, and some examples of it.

How I used it: I used it more as just a brief reference in my causal argument. Nothing super in-depth, but still there. It just served to give an idea of humans living underground, or more so using caves as shelter from the elements. It never serves as anything besides that, considering caves can be very inhospitable compared to literally anywhere else on the surface, even in harsh terrain.

Posted in Bibliography, GRADED, Mongoose, Portfolio Mongoose | 1 Comment

Research Paper – Who’s On First?

The Comfort of the Familiar:
We Prefer What We Know in Music

Although people say they look for new music, people actually prefer music that is familiar to them. In today’s world, discovering new music is easier than ever. Streaming platforms offer instant access to millions of songs across all genres. Due to the fact that more music is rapidly becoming popular and available to new audiences, a search has begun for new and exciting music that is often seen as exciting at first, with people eager to discover new genres, artists, and sounds. Yet, despite the overwhelming availability of new music, many people gravitate toward the familiar. While we often claim we are on the hunt for fresh sounds, our preferences reveal that we’re more likely to return to songs and artists we already know. This tendency underscores a deep-seated psychological and biological preference for familiarity.

The concept of always being on the hunt for new music is a modern one, brought about by advancements in media and technology. In the past, music discovery required much more work. People would attend concerts, buy albums, or hear music through radio or word-of-mouth. Now, however, streaming services allow us to explore music from around the globe with just a few taps or clicks. This has led to a belief that people are more open to experimenting with new genres and artists than ever before. And yet, when we examine how we engage with music on a deeper level, it becomes clear that people are often drawn to what they know best, despite their outward desire to explore.

Familiarity, the psychological principle that we tend to prefer things we are exposed to repeatedly, influences much of our behavior and decision-making. The National Library of Medicine explains this phenomenon through what’s called the mere exposure effect, which states that, “repeatedly presented stimuli are effectively evaluated more positively than novel stimuli.” In other words, the more we hear a song or artist, the more we tend to like it. This explains why, over time, songs that we hear frequently, whether on the radio, in movies, or at social gatherings, become favorites. Our brains process these familiar tunes more efficiently, creating positive associations that make us more likely to seek them out again.

The human tendency to prefer the familiar is also rooted in how our brains process music. Studies show the differences in neural responses to familiar and unfamiliar music. In a study conducted by Scientific Reports, it was found that the brain shows a more immediate and positive response to familiar music, as opposed to music that is unfamiliar. This quick response is linked to the brain’s reward system, which processes pleasurable stimuli more efficiently when it is familiar. In contrast, unfamiliar music may not trigger the same pleasure centers in the brain, as it is perceived as more unpredictable and harder to process. This increased cognitive effort can sometimes feel unsettling or even frustrating. The experience of hearing something new might be interesting at first, but if it requires too much mental work, we may quickly lose interest. This physiological reaction is just one more reason why we often return to familiar songs and artists instead of embracing something new.

This preference for familiar music is not just a cognitive phenomenon—it also has emotional ties. Comfort plays a huge role in why we prefer what we already know. Music is deeply tied to our emotions, and familiar tunes have the power to evoke memories and feelings of safety. For example, a song that we loved during a significant period in our life, or one we heard a lot during a season in our lives, can transport us back to that moment, bringing with it a sense of emotional security. When we listen to a song that we don’t know, we don’t have that same emotional attachment, which makes it harder for us to connect with it on the same level. Music serves as a tool for self-soothing, allowing us to process emotions or simply unwind. Psychology Today states “Music provides a positive mood, offers a valued companion, and allows us to express emotions.” This article later goes on to explain how music is meant to relieve stress and be a relaxing activity, not something that requires active consideration. It is meant to offer a momentary escape from the pressures of daily life. When life feels overwhelming, putting on a familiar song can offer a sense of emotional security and calm. Therefore, listening to new music is an unpleasant experience for those just listening for enjoyment. Most people rather gravitate towards the comfortable familiarity of music they know well. 

Something that is unfamiliar results in a jarring effect. We are naturally wary of new things as an evolutionary defense mechanism. Something new could be dangerous and so we evolved to naturally be wary of unfamiliar objects or events. Unfamiliar music, especially music from a different culture or genre, can create a sense of alienation. The difference in sound, rhythm, and structure can feel off-putting, particularly if it does not align with the cultural context or musical expectations we are used to.

This resistance to unfamiliar music is particularly evident when we consider the social and cultural influences that shape our musical preferences. The hypothesis that Bruce Wexler tests in Brain and Culture—”that early wiring in the brain makes it hard for people later to accept novelty and unfamiliar experiences. Difficulty in handling the unfamiliar—people with a different skin color, different values or a different ideology, for example—” Or perhaps unfamiliar music, “is an essential feature of the often-negative interactions between cultures.” Popular music, the kind that frequently appears on the radio or is pushed by streaming platforms, becomes part of the cultural mainstream. As such, people often gravitate toward what is widely accepted or familiar in their social circles. Listening to popular songs creates a sense of connection to others, whether at a concert, party, or casual conversation. The familiarity of these songs provides a shared experience, reinforcing the bond between individuals within a group. Unfamiliar music however, requires more cognitive effort to process, which can make it harder to enjoy. The initial experience of unfamiliar music might feel disjointed or unsatisfying, as listeners try to make sense of new structures, melodies, and harmonies.

Now it may be said that this can’t be true because people and animals do and try new things all the time or else we’d all be stuck in some strange time loop, doing the same things over and over again for all eternity. However, this argument has a few holes. While yes, we may occasionally try something completely new, it is much more likely that we try something that may be new to us but we have seen other people do or try the same thing. This is smart from a biological perspective because if one neanderthal saw another eating something and dying because of it, we would rightly stay away from said food. Similarly, if a neanderthal saw another eat something and be fine or enjoy it, we would be much more likely to try it although it may be new to us. This applies to music choice because we may be more likely to listen to music that friends say they listen to, but this still exudes a sense of familiarity. For example, maybe the friend plays it in their car or occasionally hums the tune, either way, knowing someone that we know and like listens to a certain type of music makes us more likely to listen to it.

In the context of music, this evolutionary bias toward the known can make unfamiliar genres or sounds feel jarring. Music that deviates from our expectations—whether in terms of rhythm, melody, or cultural context—can create discomfort. People might say they’re looking for new music, but they’re often hesitant to embrace unfamiliar tunes or albums, especially those from genres they’ve never encountered before. This instinctive preference for familiarity can make it harder for us to enjoy music that feels foreign or dissonant. New music often requires more cognitive effort to process, and our brains are wired to seek out what we already know. This is why some people may find it unpleasant to simply listen to a new album, especially one that is of a new genre the listener is unfamiliar with. For example, traditional music from a different culture may sound strange or unappealing at first, because its structures and harmonies don’t align with what we’re used to hearing. This sense of alienation is a direct consequence of the brain’s reluctance to process what it doesn’t recognize or predict.

The preference for familiarity isn’t limited to music alone. It’s a fundamental aspect of human psychology, rooted in our evolutionary history. Our ancestors, like all animals, were hardwired to avoid novel stimuli that could potentially pose a threat. Any creature you study shows relatively the same behavior, we are scared of the unknown. As biological beings that have evolved over many years it is in our nature to sort anything we classify as new or unfamiliar into the category of potentially being dangerous. This instinct has helped us avoid danger and injury. You can see this with animals all the time. Any time they are presented in a new environment or a new object is placed in their environment, (for example, a camera in a yard or even a new bird feeder) they are naturally wary of it. In other words, unfamiliar objects, animals, or environments are often perceived as threats until proven otherwise. This survival mechanism still affects how we interact with the world today. When we encounter something new—whether it’s an unfamiliar food, person, or environment—we are often instinctively cautious, as it could represent a danger we don’t fully understand. This is good from an evolutionary perspective because it keeps us safe from potential unknown dangers over millennia. However, this is a hindrance to those in the market for new music because our natural instincts lead us away from anything unfamiliar. 

Beyond its cognitive effects, music also has a profound emotional impact. The songs we listen to frequently often become deeply intertwined with our memories and emotions. A familiar song can evoke feelings of nostalgia, transporting us back to moments in our past when that song held particular meaning. For example, a song that we loved during a specific time in our life—perhaps a summer spent with friends, or a relationship we cherished—becomes associated with those memories. This emotional connection is one of the reasons we prefer the songs we know. New music, by contrast, lacks this emotional bond. While it may be interesting or exciting at first, it doesn’t offer the same comfort that familiar music provides. As the National Library of Medicine explains, this emotional comfort is a key reason why we often choose familiar songs over unfamiliar ones, even when we have access to an endless supply of new music. Our musical preferences are also shaped by social and cultural factors. Music, especially popular music, is often a communal experience. When we listen to songs that are widely known, we participate in a shared cultural moment. Popular songs create connections between people, whether at concerts, parties, or even casual conversations. The familiarity of a song becomes a social glue, reinforcing the bonds between individuals within a group. This social aspect can explain why people tend to gravitate toward what is familiar. Listening to music that others around us enjoy or that is commonly played on mainstream platforms helps us feel connected to a larger cultural narrative. Unfamiliar music, on the other hand, requires more effort to understand and appreciate, making it less immediately rewarding in social contexts.

Moreover, there’s the issue of identity. The music we listen to is often a reflection of who we are. It is deeply tied to our self-concept and personal identity. For example, someone who identifies as a fan of rock music may feel reluctant to explore genres like classical or jazz, not because they dislike them, but because such music challenges their musical identity. Similarly, when people try out new music, they may feel as though they’re stepping outside the boundaries of what they consider “their” music, and this can create a sense of discomfort.

The human instinct to prefer the familiar is deeply rooted in our evolutionary biology. Early humans needed to prioritize safety and predictability in their environment, and this led to a wariness of the unknown. The same instinct applies to our relationship with music. While it may seem counterintuitive in a world so focused on novelty, our brains are biologically inclined to avoid what feels unfamiliar or unpredictable. This is evident in both human behavior and the behavior of animals. For example, a dog placed in a room with its current owner who may beat the dog and a stranger, the dog will choose to go to the aggressive owner, rather than the stranger. Even though the owner is not a good one, it’s all the dog knows and we prefer what we know over what we don’t know out of the fear that the new one could be even worse than what we know. On a more positive note, this is also shown through skin to skin contact. After a woman gives birth to a baby, doctors will place the newborn on the mothers chest. As stated by the Baby Friendly Initiative, this “regulates the baby’s heart rate and breathing, helping them to better adapt to life outside the womb.” Both the baby’s and the mothers stress goes down with skin to skin contact because both mother and baby are used to constant contact from when the baby was in the womb. They are familiar with the touch and even smell of each other so it calms both of them to be with what they know. The same thing happens when we listen to music that is familiar to us, we feel comforted by familiarity. It lights up a part of our brain and engages the neural pathways that are comforted by familiarity and causes us to enjoy music that is familiar to us far more than music that is new. This instinct for familiarity extends to music, where songs we’ve heard before provide a comforting and predictable experience, while unfamiliar music requires more cognitive effort to process.

Interestingly, our preference for familiarity is not just about avoiding danger but also about efficiency. Looking at the concept of cognitive fluency, which Bill Cates defines as “the ease with which information can be processed and understood by the brain,” our brains have evolved to process familiar information with minimal effort, which is why we tend to enjoy music that follows familiar patterns or structures. Music that aligns with the rhythms and melodies we already know is easier to enjoy because our brains don’t have to work as hard to decode it.

Despite our inherent preference for the familiar, the idea of discovering new music remains a popular topic of conversation. Some people truly enjoy the challenge of seeking out fresh sounds and exploring new genres. This is often seen as an intellectual pursuit—a way to stimulate the brain and challenge oneself musically. However, this type of active listening is a more niche activity, and it does not reflect the music-listening habits of most people. The very idea of “looking for new music” seems at odds with the widespread comfort people seek in songs they’ve already heard countless times. However, Rachel Ament, a writer for the New York Times, NPR, Oxygen, Teen Vogue and Paste Magazine, writes in The Paris Review, a highly prominent literary magazine, “the enjoyment of discovering new music is in its ability to stimulate the brain, creating an intellectually engaging experience.” This article suggests that new music holds intellectual value, stimulating our minds and offering mental challenges. These sources argue that music’s true power lies in its ability to stimulate the brain and process new information. However, these views fail to consider the broader role that music plays in people’s daily lives, especially for those who listen primarily for emotional comfort and relaxation. Many people are not looking for the kind of mental engagement or intellectual stimulation that comes when they listen to music. For the average listener, music is less about exploring new ideas and more about relaxation and emotional connection. As Psychology Today notes, “music is a tool for stress relief, mood regulation, and emotional expression.” Most people listen to music to unwind, not to engage in a mental exercise.

In fact, as studies have shown, people tend to enjoy music more when it’s familiar because it requires less mental energy to process. A PLOS ONE study was done using a listening test and a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment, to clarify the role of familiarity in the brain correlates of music appreciation by controlling, in the same study, for both familiarity and musical preferences. This study found that familiarity with a song is a stronger predictor of enjoyment than any other factor, including musical preference. “We show that although consumers say they would prefer to listen to unfamiliar music, in actuality familiarity with music positively predicts preference for songs, play lists, and radio stations.” Songs that sound similar to other songs we normally listen to influences our music choice. And others are even able to predict what we will choose to listen to by what we already do listen to, which disproves the whole new music idea. This explains why people tend to gravitate back to their favorite songs, even when there are countless new tracks available to them.

While it’s clear that streaming services and social media have made discovering new music easier than ever, people continue to return to what they know. The human preference for familiar music is driven by psychological, emotional, and social factors, all of which make us more likely to seek comfort rather than novelty. This tendency is rooted in our evolutionary history, where familiarity signaled safety and predictability. Music is not just an intellectual pursuit for most people—it’s a deeply emotional experience. Familiar songs create connections to our memories, our identities, and our social groups, which makes them more enjoyable and comforting. While the search for new music can be exciting for some, it remains a niche activity. For most, music is a tool for relaxation, emotional expression, and connection. As much as we may claim to be on the lookout for new and exciting sounds, it’s the familiar tracks that continue to dominate our playlists, offering comfort and security in an ever-changing world.

References

Shahram Heshmat Ph.D. “5 Reasons Why We Listen to Music | Psychology Today” Psychology Today, 14 October 2021. 14 November 2024.

“How to Really Listen to Music – The Paris Review” Rachel Ament. The Paris Review, 22 August 2019. 14 November 2024.

“Skin-to-skin contact – Baby Friendly Initiative” Skin-to-skin contact. 9 December 2024. 16 November 2024.

“Music and Emotions in the Brain: Familiarity Matters | PLOS ONE” Salimpoor, V. N., Benovoy, M., Longo, G. L., Cooperstock, J. R., & Zatorre, R. J. (2011). 

Music and emotions in the brain: Familiarity matters. PLOS ONE, 6(10), e25738.

“Music Streaming Services Stats (2024)” Fabio Duarte. Exploding Topics, 1 February 2024. 3 November 2124.

“The Contribution of Attention to the Mere Exposure Effect for Parts of Advertising Images – PMC” PubMed Central. National Library of Medicine, 5 September 2018. 3 November 2124.

“Our Aversion to the Unfamiliar | American Scientist” Judy Illes, Vivian Chin. American Scientist, 28 October 2021. 3 November 2024.

“Rapid Brain Responses to Familiar vs. Unfamiliar Music – an EEG and Pupillometry study | Scientific Reports” Current Opinion in Neurobiology. ScienceDirect, October 2023. 3 November 2024.

Posted in GRADED, Portfolio Who'sOnFirst?, Research Position Paper, Who'sOnFirst? | 1 Comment

Research – yardie

American Obesity:
A Consequence of Exploitation

We are a fat country. Americans are continuing to contribute to the rising rates of obesity. Still, even after knowing about the problematic disease, we choose to spend thousands every year on “weight loss solutions.” Pills, gym memberships, surgeries, expensive equipment, and personal trainers are encouraged now more than ever. People are constantly exposed to the algorithms and expectations of having a healthy lifestyle, where social media displays the enticing lifestyles of thin, active, and healthy celebrities. Taking advantage of this, weight loss programs conspire to addict us to an endless cycle of gaining and losing the same weight over and over again. The real solution is to eat healthier. The lack of knowledge about diet contributes more significantly to the obesity epidemic in America than the lack of exercise. While physical activity is an important factor in maintaining a healthy weight, the overwhelming commonness of misinformation on nutrition pushed on us by exploiters who want our money plays a crucial role in the rising rates of obesity. 

According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, “1 in 3 adults are overweight” and “more than 2 in 5 adults have obesity.” This shows us that obesity is a problem in America. It’s a chronic and complex disease defined by excessive fat deposits that can impair health. It is said to likely lead to higher risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, cancers, and bone health and reproduction issues. The diagnosis for obesity is done by dividing a person’s weight by their height to get their BMI, body mass index. Body mass index is a surrogate marker of fatness and additional measurements that help indicate whether or not a person has obesity. This takes us back to a person’s insulin resistance and how well their body is able to control it. Insulin is a peptide hormone that is released in the body every time a person consumes food, it’s a complex condition in which your body does not respond as it should to insulin, a hormone your pancreas makes that’s essential for regulating blood sugar levels. The American diet however, has no respect for insulin control and has neglected their bodies. The truth is society and world rulers want us in a cycle to exploit and control humans. The cycle of consuming unhealthy foods, gaining weight, wanting to lose it or become healthy, and then going to the gym and paying more money when the temporary results don’t last.

In all reality, the number one cause of this obesity epidemic is said to be the consumption of processed foods. Processed foods are a significant contributor to the obesity epidemic and it doesn’t help that these options are addictive, and cheaper in price. While this issue exists, it’s essential to consider the broader context, including lifestyle, socioeconomic status, and education about nutrition. Processed foods today are all around Americans, everywhere we go. It is portrayed as something not necessarily healthy, but not completely bad for you either. Everyday we are met with ads, videos, images that promote processed foods, which subtly promotes obesity and unhealthy consumption. Processed foods refer to any food that’s changed from its natural state. This can include food that was simply cut, washed, heated, pasteurized, canned, cooked, frozen, dried, dehydrated, mixed, or packaged. It also can include food that has added preservatives, nutrients, flavors, salts, sugars, or fats.

The truth is Americans don’t want to give up their Burger King’s Triple Whopper with Cheese, or the Ben and Jerry’s ice cream at 2 am, and the bottomless all you can eat fries, wings, and sodas at their favorite restaurants. This undeniably contributes to the rising rates of obesity in America. The fat country problem can be understood through four stages, of awareness, understanding, belief, and action. The first stage is awareness where scientists have researched and gathered data on the unhealthy habits that contribute to obesity, where they can come up with alternatives and helpful strategies for a healthy lifestyle by providing the causes and risks of obesity. The second stage is understanding, where society processes and absorbs the information. At this point, the responsibility shifts to us as individuals to decide how to use this knowledge. The third stage is belief, which is often the most challenging. Regardless of the overwhelming evidence, many people struggle to trust or embrace the facts about obesity, sometimes feeling defensive or resistant to ideas that challenge their lifestyles and comforts. Finally, the fourth stage is action; deciding to turn understanding into meaningful change. While information about healthy living is readily available, widely distributed, and understood, many individuals need help to break free from secure habits. This resistance to change keeps unhealthy behaviors, contributing to the growing obesity statistics in America.

Awareness; to successfully solve any problem like obesity in America, we first have to find information about the disease. Why does it happen? How do we stop it? And how do we still enjoy our favorite foods and maintain health? Scientists, realizing the problem and wanting to better the American population, have uncovered significant insights into the obesity epidemic. They have devised valuable strategies to reduce unhealthy habits and promote a healthy lifestyle. Through research, science has found that several biological, environmental, and behavioral factors control obesitỵ Studies from Harvard Health, show that genes in a person can affect their appetite, sense of fullness, metabolic rate, and food cravings. Furthermore, the CDC reported that Americans now are consuming 300 more calories a day than the average person 60 years ago. This increase in food intake has significantly contributed to the problem. Americans have become too comfortable with eating excessively. 

Environmental factors such as tempting foods being super prominent at shopping centers, sports stadiums, amusements, workplaces, and on common roadways or areas only make healthier living 10 times harder. Will people have self-control, or let their desires get the best of them?  At a physiological level, the balance between caloric intake and energy expenditure is fundamental. When individuals consistently consume more calories than their bodies burn, the excess is stored as fat, leading to weight gain. The solution to combat obesity, while challenging, is rooted in dietary choices. It is scientifically approved that the whole foods diet is the most effective in fueling a healthy human body. Whole foods are closer to their natural state of process. They are typically low in calories but still keep a person full and energized. What exactly are whole foods? The American Journal explains that whole foods are rich in fiber, proteins, whole grains, essential nutrients like fruits and vegetables, proteins like eggs, beans, nuts, chicken breast, and fish, and carbohydrates for energy.

Understanding; could the problem be that Americans are too oblivious and misinformed to understand obesity? The solutions are blatantly simple and widespread through countless sources such as social media platforms, television or radio channels, schools, workplaces, and gyms. Even though the causes of obesity and solutions to it are simple and out there Americans fail to fully understand or act on it. We are a fat country that contrastingly sabotages ourselves into believing skewed concepts of healthy eating. Resorting to unhealthy habits like “calories in, calories out,” fast magical weight loss meds, or myths that overcomplicate what should be straightforward. These flawed concepts will never work long-term and they just hurt and set us back even more. In reality, it is simply, don’t overeat, consume mostly whole food meals, and treat yourself to those cravings occasionally and in moderation.

Belief; if you are not oblivious to obesity and understand it, maybe you just refuse to believe it and don’t take it seriously. Americans are great at turning a blind eye to pressing issues, sweeping our problems under the rug, or being senseless about certain topics that challenge us. The information on obesity is heard by the public but not cared for. Some of us aren’t affected by the issue so we end up promoting contributing factors that support the disease. An example of this is unhealthy drug and alcohol use and eating habits. We often see what looks to be healthy people around us that consume unhealthy amounts of drugs or foods, social media is a prime spreader of this kind of content. This results in some people becoming victims of the unrealistic connotations of living certain lifestyles. They get confused and decide to not take the situation seriously. This is now everyone’s problem and not only an obese person’s duty to solve it. This collective apathy not only worsens the problem but also reflects a larger cultural pattern of avoiding accountability when it matters most. 

A person’s food choices are often influenced by cultural, behavioral, environmental, and socioeconomic influences. Today, there is less concern of what Americans necessarily put into their mouths, but instead if you go to the gym, or participate in a physical activity or not. We are programmed to this lifestyle by societal costumes, influenced heavily by the media. Americans are fooled, believing that solutions for health and weight management are to get in the gym. Exercise is often the first recommendation for those looking to lose weight. Many are advised that the most effective strategy for rapid weight loss is the “calories in, calories out” approach. While experts typically advocate for incorporating some form of physical activity, the question remains: how should one go about it? This cultural practice is fueled by the fitness industry, which emphasizes physical transformation and gym memberships as markers of success. Social media platforms are permeated with images of toned bodies and workout routines. This influences others that exercise alone is the key to achieving health and aesthetics. A study done by the University of Colorado Anschutz claimed that exercise was more critical than diet when maintaining weight loss. The study included two groups, one with successful weight loss maintainers with high levels of physical activity and the other group being unsuccessful weight-loss maintainers with little to no physical activity. “The findings reveal that successful weight-loss maintainers rely on physical activity to remain in energy balance, rather than chronic restriction of dietary intake, to avoid weight regain.” “Our findings suggest that this group of successful weight-loss maintainers are consuming a similar number of calories per day as individuals with overweight and obesity but appear to avoid weight regain by compensating for this with high levels of physical activity,” said Victoria A. Catenacci, MD, a weight management physician and researcher at CU Anschutz Medical Campus.

While it may be true that exercise plays a significant role in overall health, the notion that exercise is more critical than diet in managing weight loss is misleading. This narrative made up by the University of Colorado Anschutz creates an incomplete picture of what it truly takes to achieve and maintain a healthy lifestyle. Numerous studies highlight that diet accounts for about 80% of weight loss results, with exercise contributing a much smaller fraction. For instance, you’d have to run nearly an hour to burn off the calories in a single fast-food meal, but simply choosing a healthier, lower-calorie meal in the first place would eliminate the need for that hour-long run. Glorifying gym culture creates a distorted view of health by prioritizing aesthetics over sustainability. While it’s inspiring to see people dedicate themselves to fitness, relying on exercise alone often leads to burnout or discouragement because it’s hard to out-exercise a poor diet. The cycle of overindulging in unhealthy foods and attempting to “work it off” in the gym can be both physically and emotionally exhausting. 

It’s hard to resist, when the popular, new culture, created by humans is to look good, and feel good. How is this attained? They tell you to get surgeries, go to the gym, take certain medications, or get on weight loss plans. America is very quick to look at the outer appearance to want to start making changes when they don’t meet the stereotypical expectation of a healthy lifestyle. According to the Weight Loss Resources article, What is Exercise?, exercise is “any movement that works your body at a greater intensity than your usual level of daily activity. Exercise raises your heart rate and works your muscles and is most commonly undertaken to achieve the aim of physical fitness.” 

This comes back to the cycle of gaining weight, wanting to lose weight, and then becoming victim to the unrealistic solutions. These solutions are put in place simply to make the rich man richer. America has always been a country run by money, so it is no surprise that doctors who own weight loss remedies, or gym franchises, and fast-food industries promote false narratives to trap easily-influenced zombies into their money lure. The real issue lies in education. People aren’t obese because there’s a lack of gyms or weight-loss pills; they’re obese because they’ve never been taught how to eat right. Diet culture bombards us with conflicting advice, while fast food is marketed as cheap and convenient. Society glorifies these quick fixes without addressing the simple truth: without the knowledge and discipline to sustain healthy habits, no surgery, injection, or newly trending diet will keep the weight off for good. Ultimately, the choice comes down to what’s more beneficial and ethical for us as human beings. Humans weren’t designed to rely on needles or scalpels to manage their weight. Instead, we thrive when we nourish ourselves with real food and move our bodies in natural ways that are not forced. It is normal to see people online participating in mukbangs or food reviews. The common pattern in these videos however, is that the food being consumed is almost always fast food, or processed foods and excessive amounts of it. 

Who cares! Why worry about eating a whole foods diet and having self-control with food when there are easy-to-take weight loss pills, surgeries, gyms, and other quick fixes? Contrary to my argument that the lack of knowledge about healthy eating habits contributes more significantly to the obesity epidemic in America than the lack of exercise, or fast remedies society has discovered, many people have expressed opinions of ‘emphasizing the importance of exercise’ or ‘Pushing the idea of weight loss procedures and pills.’ According to the ASMBS, a society for metabolic and bariatric weight loss surgery; they state that bariatric surgery is more effective and durable than obesity drugs and lifestyle interventions. Researchers for the ASMBS found that lifestyle interventions such as dieting and exercise resulted in an average weight loss of 7.4% that eventually was generally regained within 4.1 years. They claimed that their procedures resulted in 10.6 – 21.1 % weight loss. While this way of becoming skinny may be appealing given the fast results and lazy-friendly process, it isn’t at all sustainable or a smart choice to make. 

Becoming a victim of these procedures, named, tirzepatide or GLP-1 semaglutide means months of weekly injections, and on an estimate, a cost of 1,000 dollars a month. This approach not only drains wallets but also locks an individual into a cycle of dependency on medication. And for what? Once you have finally had enough of these weekly tortures, it is said that about half the lost weight will return within a year. Knowing this, it truly doesn’t make a difference in the amount of weight you lose and how long it stays off. Clearly, if you stop eating right, you will regain unhealthy weight. And if you stop taking these injections, you will also regain the unhealthy weight. This comes down to whether the process of injections is more beneficial and morally ethical for you as a human being. Humans weren’t designed to live a life of painful injections forever, but instead to simply eat a balanced diet. In addition to this, eating well fosters a sense of self-control and accountability that quick fixes can’t provide. It’s about building habits and learning how to listen to your body. It’s important to know when you’re hungry and when you’re full. These are skills that stick with you for life, unlike procedures or pills that ineffectively hide the problem without facing its root cause. 

Action: will we as a society ever reach a breaking point where we’re fed up with looking sluggish, soft, or stuck in a constant state of discomfort? The reality is many of us are living with a sense of dissatisfaction about our bodies, knowing deep down that the way we feel is linked to our choices. “You are what you eat” is an expression often tossed around as a joke. However, it has become more real than we realize. These easy and simple approaches to fitness often provide only temporary solutions, addressing the symptoms rather than the underlying issues. A more effective way to tackle the obesity epidemic is to change the food industry and how we consume food.  We should start to think more and have a mind of our own. It is very easy to get drawn in and submit to the controls of the world. Addressing the obesity epidemic requires a comprehensive approach centered around improved dietary plans. Embracing a diet that prioritizes whole, unprocessed foods, where what we eat is as close to its natural state as possible, can offer a healthier, more sustainable solution. We now have all the answers and solutions to tackling obesity, but will we take action on it? Solving this issue has never been easy and won’t get any easier. It requires time, energy, and effort to turn away from the comfort of quick, unhealthy fixes, but the payoff is more than worth it. Choosing healthier options may feel difficult at first and can be stressful when we’re surrounded by tempting alternatives. But the truth is, the benefits of making those choices are invaluable. We can live more effectively, more energized, and yes, for longer. We as humans always strive to look better by acting a certain way, dressing a certain way, putting on makeup, and even trying to obtain social status or items that may make us more attractive. We need to do the same for our health and know that this is a long-term investment in ourselves for a better life.

References

Ariane Hundt. (2017) What the Fitness Industry Doesn’t Want You to Know. https://www.arianehundt.com/post/what-the-fitness-industry-doesn-t-want-you-to-know

ASMBS. (2024) Bariatric Surgery More Effective and Durable Than New Obesity Drugs and Lifestyle Intervention. https://asmbs.org/news_releases/bariatric-surgery-more-effective-and-durable-than-new-obesity-drugs-and-lifestyle-intervention/

Christophe Haubursin and Julia Belluz. The Science is in: Exercise Won’t Help You Lose Much Weight. https://www.vox.com/2018/1/3/16845438/exercise-weight-loss-myth-burn-calories

Elvira isganaitis and Robert H. Lustig. (2005) Fast Food, Central Nervous System Insulin Resistance, and Obesity. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.atv.0000186208.06964.91

Harvard Health Publishing Medical School. (2019) Why People Become Overweight. https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/why-people-become-overweight

Julia Milzer. (2019) Study: exercise is more critical than diet to maintain weight loss. https://news.cuanschutz.edu/news-stories/cu-anschutz-study-reveals-exercise-is-more-critical-than-diet-to-maintain-weight-loss

Melinda Gibbons. (2005) Weight Loss Surgery Is More Effective Than Diet and Exercise in Helping Severely Obese People Lose Weight. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9140.html

Patrick Mustain. (2016) How the Fitness Industry Gets Rich Doing Nothing. https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-the-fitness-industry-gets-rich-doing-nothing/

Slyvia Davis. (2023) Obesity: Symptoms, Causes, Treatment https://www.webmd.com/obesity/what-obesity-is

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. (2024) https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(23)66356-7/fulltext

Posted in GRADED, Portfolio Yardie, Research Position Paper, Yardie | 2 Comments