Rebuttal Rewrite-Rebelpilot64

The effects of Book Banning

Book banning has been causing many problems to teachers, students and parents all across the country. However, sometimes book banning may not always be a negative thing either. Book banning in schools has been happening right now and has been causing a lot of problems on both sides of the topic. While book banning is overall a bad thing to do, There are several reasons why book banning can be a good thing. 

For one thing, book banning in schools prevents kids from viewing sensitive topics that some parents may not feel are appropriate for their own kids. While sensitive topics can be a good thing to normalize, Certain topics like sex, pressure or death are very sensitive for certain people and can cause kids to feel uncomfortable in school. Schools and parents don’t want their kids to feel uncomfortable with the topics that they are learning at school. An example to prove this is, In the article pros and cons of book banning, parents of teenaged schoolchildren express anger when such texts are approved for study in school. This shows that parents don’t want their kids to listen to certain topics that are too sensitive for their kids and can cause someone to feel upset.

Another reason why there are positives to book banning is that it will prevent kids from reading things that are too mature for their age. If a kid reads about something very mature for their age like sex, drugs etc. It may cause kids to say or do things that are not appropriate for their age. An example to prove this is,  in the article pros and cons of book banning, most of the books that have been censored due to content and the age level they were aimed at were mostly misjudgments about its content and message. While every kid may mature at different levels, sometimes schools have to just keep books in their libraries that are close to the appropriate age for the kids because schools can’t get books for all multiple age levels. 

Another thing to consider is that it could prevent kids from having ideas that are not something they should be doing. An example to prove this is, in the article The Pros and cons of book banning, Sometimes, people are influenced by what they read or see. This quote proves that people can get influenced by bad behavior or other things that they should not do. While kids do need to learn right from wrong, Sometimes, people will get influenced by the way certain characters behave based on what they have been doing in the book.

While I do know that there are many negative effects to banning books, there are positives to doing that as well. When kids are prevented from seeing things that parents consider inappropriate for their children, It keeps the kids from seeing things that cause them trouble, seeing sensitive things, or things that are way to mature for them. When kids see things that are appropriate it won’t lead to as many problems.

References

Shares. “Pros and Cons of Book Banning.” Vision Launch Media, 15 Jan. 2017, visionlaunch.com/pros-cons-book-banning/.

Posted in Rebuttal Rewrite | 3 Comments

Rebuttal-RebelPilot64

The effects on book banning

Book banning has been causing many problems to teachers, students and parents all across the country. However, sometimes book banning may not always be a negative thing either. Book banning in schools has been happening right now and has been causing a lot of problems on both sides of the topic. While book banning is overall a bad thing to do, There are several reasons why book banning can be a good thing. 

For one thing, book banning in schools prevents kids from viewing sensitive topics that some parents may not feel are appropriate for their own kids. While sensitive topics can be a good thing to normalize, Certain topics like sex, pressure or death are very sensitive for certain people and can cause kids to feel uncomfortable in school. Schools and parents don’t want their kids to feel uncomfortable with the topics that they are learning at school. An example to prove this is, In the article pros and cons of book banning, parents of teenaged schoolchildren express anger when such texts are approved for study in school. This shows that parents don’t want their kids to listen to certain topics that are too sensitive for their kids and can cause someone to feel upset.

Another reason why there are positives to book banning is that it will prevent kids from reading things that are too mature for their age. If a kid reads about something very mature for their age like sex, drugs etc. It may cause kids to say or do things that are not appropriate for their age. An example to prove this is,  in the article pros and cons of book banning, most of the books that have been censored due to content and the age level they were aimed at were mostly misjudgments about its content and message. While every kid may mature at different levels, sometimes schools have to just keep books in their libraries that are close to the appropriate age for the kids because schools can’t get books for all multiple age levels. 

Another thing to consider is that it could prevent kids from having ideas that are not something they should be doing. An example to prove this is, in the article The Pros and cons of book banning, Sometimes, people are influenced by what they read or see. This quote proves that people can get influenced by bad behavior or other things that they should not do. While kids do need to learn right from wrong, Sometimes, people will get influenced by the way certain characters behave based on what they have been doing in the book.
          While I do know that there are many negative effects to banning books, there are positives to doing that as well. When kids are prevented from seeing things that parents consider inappropriate for their children, It keeps the kids from seeing things that cause them trouble, seeing sensitive things, or things that are way to mature for them. When kids see things that are appropriate it won’t lead to as many problems.

references

Shares                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        . “Pros and Cons of Book Banning.” Vision Launch Media, 15 Jan. 2017, visionlaunch.com/pros-cons-book-banning/.

Posted in Rebuttal Draft | Leave a comment

Research – chich_

Why Digital Media desperately needs Values and Virtue

 The use of digital media has become ever so rampant in the 21st century. From young children to the elderly, almost everyone owns or is linked to a digital device. Whether it be a smartphone, a television screen, a radio, a tablet, or a computer, everyone is seconds away from partaking in digital media. With its increasing popularity and becoming a necessity, digital media should positively influence consumers’ minds. It is no secret that digital media has harmful effects on individuals. But, there is a need for digital media to start moving to more value and virtue-centered content. This paper discusses the impact of digital media, specifically television shows, and how it is necessary to show and depict values and virtue.

The content team has decided to create their television series, Timmy, to teach and instill the necessary values and virtues to attain genuine happiness. The television series begins with a thirteen-year-old boy, Timmy, who travels to the future to talk to his future self. As young Timmy converses with his older self, he is told that despite all the wealth, fame, and power, that does not lead to genuine happiness. Older Timmy tells his younger self that the key to health and happiness is love and relationships. But, to achieve this, what is needed is values and virtue. With value and virtue, one realizes the beauty in everyday life, but more importantly, the beauty in love. It is through love where one becomes truly happy. That self-giving love allows a person to love another fully. Love full of value and virtue enables one to emphasize relationships. These three aspects of life work together; they are intertwined. Values and virtue are needed to find and foster self-giving love and maintain solid relationships. Knowing this, young Timmy travels back to his time, seeks to learn and develop values, strives to practice living by them continuously, and understands what it takes to love and build strong relationships. The television show will illustrate Timmy’s development, showcasing his journey into finding true happiness in his life. Timmy serves as an example to anyone, especially youth, of what it truly takes to become happy. The television show aims to be grounded by realism, showing all the difficulties and complexities of life. Simply put, the television show, named after its main character, Timmy, follows a young boy’s long road to finding happiness through values and virtue which inevitably fosters love.

As content creators of an original television series, it is essential to know that it can bring about harmful physical and mental effects, especially on the youth (Thomas, 2014). Firstly, excessive television watching can impact the brain development of children. According to Thomas (2014), and further asserted by Mythili, watching TV for two hours or more a day will affect children’s brain development. By impacting brain development, this leads to children possibly having behavioral problems in the future. Moreover, they found that prolonged TV viewing might lower cognitive abilities, reading and math skills, and language development (Thomas, 2014; Mythili, 2021). However, it is essential to note that Thomas and Mythili focus on excessive viewing. Mythili recommends not allowing children below pre-school to engage in television activity. Therefore, if parents strictly prohibit or limit television watching to a maximum of thirty minutes to an hour per day, it could potentially lessen such harmful effects on brain development. 

Also, television shows have the opportunity to be educational. These educational series can develop young children’s learning and social skills (Caron et al., 2009). The World Economic Forum agrees that educational series can help develop one’s literacy, interpersonal, and critical thinking skills (World Economic Forum, 2020). Examples of these education series include Sesame Street, The Magic School Bus, Dr. Seuss, Little Einsteins, and Bill Nye the Science Guy. Television programs that can serve an older demographic are Jeopardy, Disney Earth or National Geographic Documentaries, Mythbusters, and Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood. Mythili (2021) says that only a few channels broadcast educational content covering subjects like art and craft, science, history, geography, and math. Thus, more television shows like Timmy are needed to be created and released to the public. Timmy properly educates the youth on where true happiness lies and how to arrive at that—showcasing the reality of life as a young boy, struggling to practice to live virtuously, and building solid relationships. It is clear that television shows can heavily influence brain development. But, by placing a limit on screen time and monitoring what TV series children watch, television shows can become a platform for education and the development of necessary life skills.

Another harmful effect is that television series have normalized the depiction of vices such as alcohol, drugs, and sex. According to Bar-on (2000), the average child annually sees about 14,000 sexual references, innuendos, jokes, together with substance instances. The use of tobacco, alcohol, and drugs has become highly prevalent in television shows. Bar-on found that alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drugs are present in 70% of prime-time network dramatic programs and half of all music videos (Bar-on, 2000). This heavily influences children and teenage behavior, as they realize that it is normal to perform such acts. Most especially because the characters performing these acts do not suffer any consequences. Inevitably, teenagers’ sexual attitudes, values, and beliefs are tainted. According to Ponio (2021), children learn about right and wrong from TV shows and online videos. Those shows or videos are often inappropriate for their age, nor do they teach moral lessons. Ponio (2021) further states that a shortage of television shows catered to older teenagers that depict moral lessons. 

Two parties are involved in adequately shaping children’s acts, values, and beliefs – parents and the large media companies. It is up to these two parties to properly educate children about morals and values. To battle out the rampant depiction of alcohol, sex, and drugs, media companies should start creating content that revolves around virtue and morals. Virtues and moral values are vital in any stage of life as they allow one’s core to be full of kindness, humility, courage, and compassion (Ponio, 2021). Having a solid core will instill the necessary mindset to battle out harmful influences. Timmy intends to show a young boy’s struggle with building his morals. As stated above, the television show aims to be as realistic as possible to convince the audience to turn to value and virtue rather than harmful substances. Therefore, Timmy may still include a few comedic instances concerning alcohol to keep a more realistic tone. But, again, the show’s primary focus is still to teach children about building values that help them find true happiness. 

Moving on, another negative effect of television shows is addiction. According to Melinda Ratini (2021), addiction can be defined as excessive behavior or dependence on a substance or action/activity. Addicts tend to create habits for a couple of reasons, and it could be to feel relieved from tension, self-control, happiness, etc. Being addicted to TV is a behavioral addiction; therefore, it urges people to do something hard to control and stop. 

There are a couple of symptoms to show whether someone is addicted to TV or not. For example, tolerance means needing more action to get the same feeling. Suppose you stop spending time on important things and people in your life. You keep doing the action, even if it doesn’t make you feel good anymore (Ratini, 2021). Ultimately being addicted to watching TV shows is proven to be a real issue in our society. Due to TV addiction, issues that consistently come up include having a negative body outlook among women, lifestyle changes, sleeping problems, and heavy contributions to mental and physical disorders (Ratini, 2021). Additionally, television addiction can lessen a viewer’s physical activity. Children between the ages of 8-16 years old have a higher body mass index and body fat when watching 4-plus hours of TV per day (Ratini, 2021). 

The issues that arise due to television addiction are severe and detrimental to one’s health. Knowing this, the content creators aim to create a limited series (a television series only containing one season, usually consisting of eight to ten episodes) to lessen the chance of addiction. In addition, there are also positive effects to television exposure. Study shows that television shows may help turn college students away from alcohol and substance abuse. College students tend to fall into harmful substances; it can educate people about important topics, such as health and social relationships (Melinda Ratini, 2021). 

Lastly, television series can cause children to develop violent mindsets and behavior. One is bound to come across a violent movie or television series as they turn on their TV. According to Fitzpatrick (2018), 90% of movies and 60% of TV series have some form of violence in them. Moreover, younger consumers view extremely harsh and abrasive content. To be specifc, they view over 1,000 rapes, murders, robberies, and assaults sitting in front of the television set (Bar-on, 2000). These scenes are tremendously harmful to young children. They could develop perceptions and expectations about what they think the real world is like at a young age. Children exposed to scenes of violence may believe that the world is more dangerous than it is. This can cause children to have a more violent mindset and grow up to have an aggressive nature. 

With YouTube and Netflix, television shows have become very accessible nowadays; children are exposed with just a click of a button. As stated above, parents must limit their children from this easy access, mainly because there are many violent scenes on TV. They need to monitor and teach their kids that too much of something is wrong and that not everything you see on television is real. Aside from this, children are bound to learn how to balance their screen time and learn how to be more responsible and diligent. These virtues are essential to a person’s growth in character. Kids need to be mature enough to be exposed to movies and shows and understand that these scenes are all just for show. Timmy will not depict any violent scenes, therefore lessening the chances of viewers to attain such a damaging mindset and personality. Instead, Timmy will teach viewers how developing virtue can allow one to live to their fullest potential and importantly build strong relationships, consequently achieving the genuine happiness everyone seeks.

Digital media, more specifically television series, are highly impactful. Viewers are influenced and learn from what they watch; they use and apply what they see on TV in real life. As to everything, there are always positives and negatives. Television series are no exception. The adverse effects of watching television shows can be detrimental to one’s physical and mental health, most especially the developing minds of children. But, parents and TV companies make lessening and avoiding these effects possible. Placing restrictions on TV screen time, monitoring what one watches, and reducing the depiction of alcohol, drugs, sex, and violence can genuinely help battle television’s harmful effects. With that, the content creators believe that media platforms should start producing television shows that exhibit values and virtue. By creating Timmy, the creators’ objective is to teach viewers, focusing on the youth demographic, how to find true happiness in life by living and practicing virtue. Aside from this, the creators hope that Timmy will serve as an example for other production companies to start releasing their own content that shows and exemplifies virtue. Everyone is aware of the power of digital media, and it is only fitting that content creators nowadays influence the public positively.

Works Cited

Bar-on, M. E. (2000, October 1). The effects of television on Child health: Implications and recommendations. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from https://adc.bmj.com/content/83/4/289. 

Caron, Andre et al. A National Study on Children’s Television Programming in Canada. Centre for Youth and Media Studies, Universite de Montreal, 2009.

Caroline Fitzpatrick Researcher at Concordia’s PERFORM center and Assistant Professor of Psychology. (2021, September 9). Watching violence on screens makes children more emotionally distressed. The Conversation. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from https://theconversation.com/watching-violence-on-screens-makes-children-more-emotionally-distressed-106757.

Mythili, S. (2021, September 13). 12 good and bad effects of television on children. MomJunction. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from https://www.momjunction.com/articles/good-bad-effects-television-children_0074078/. 

Ponio, J. (2021, August 23). Why are moral values important in children? – our father’s House. Our Father’s House Soup Kitchen. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from https://ofhsoupkitchen.org/importance-moral-values-children. 

Ratini, M. (2021, June 17). What is TV addiction? addiction cycles, health problems, and more. WebMD. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/addiction/what-to-know-about-tv-addiction#2-7.

Sakellariouv, A. M. (2015, January 1). Virtue ethics and its potential as the leading moral theory. Inquiries Journal. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1385/virtue-ethics-and-moral-theory.

Thomas, L. (2014, June 16). Television has a negative influence on kids and should be limited. why.org. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from https://whyy.org/articles/television-has-a-negative-influence-on-kids-and-should-be-limited/:~:text=First,%20TV%20is%20a%20bad,more%20likely%20to%20be%20overweight.&text=This%20evidence%20shows%20that%20kids,can%20affect%20children’s%20brain%20development. 

Torre, N. U. (2015, December 6). TV shows impart good values, life lessons–for a change. INQUIRER.net. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from https://entertainment.inquirer.net/184955/tv-shows-impart-good-values-life-lessons-for-a-change

World Economic Forum. (n.d.). Benefits and opportunities. Digital Media and Society. Retrieved December 6, 2021, from http://reports.weforum.org/human-implications-of-digital-media-2016/benefits-and-opportunities/. 

Posted in Research Position Paper | 1 Comment

Rebuttal Rewrite- Indigo

Snowflake Generation

It is common for the older generations to critique Gen Z and millennials for being too sensitive. That “kids” now have it too easy. A particular subject of discussion for the older generation is how education has changed over the years. Grandpas around the world are used to telling their grandchildren that they had to walk five miles in the snow in order to get to school. They feel as though younger generations are too soft these days. Mental health and its severities are greatly contested amongst all age groups. Anxiety and depression from school could be all made up.

College is typically a time when students try to find out who they are. College kids experiment and try to find their place in the world. For the first time, many students are living out from under the watch of their parents. Parents play a crucial role in their child’s development. Psychology Today’s Diane E Dreher suggests that over controlling parents are to blame for their child’s school related anxiety. Dreher writes, “they frantically package them for success, protecting their children from failure while pressuring them to excel, doing their homework, making their decisions, and micromanaging their lives.” Dreher is commenting on how some parents choose to parent their children. She feels as though the parents are to blame for school related anxiety. There is no argument that parents cause school related stress for their children due to the pressure. However, it is called into question whether the parents are making their children “soft” which causes them to be overly anxious students. Or, if school is really that hard for the students of today, regardless of the way the children were parented.

Dreher furthers her stance by saying, “They experience greater distress and adjustment difficulties, putting overwhelming demands on college counseling centers.” Dreher is acknowledging that college aged kids have stress. Nowadays colleges have counseling and wellness centers. This concept can be lost on the older generation who maybe had a nurse/doctor on campus. Dreher is taking the responsibility of good mental health off the school and onto the student. Dreher is actually blaming the students for overcrowding the school counselors. By putting the blame on the students, she is inferring that it is today’s students that are the issue. That too many of them are having mental health issues.

When college kids do see the counselors, the counselors are ready to diagnose. Rutter and Mintz from Inside Higher Ed say, “Institutions, especially the best funded, have grown increasingly responsive to the psychological problems on their campuses – a response intensified by liability concerns.” These writers are alluding to the notion that high funded colleges are succumbing to the illusions of today’s students out of liability concerns. Rutter and Mintz are taking away the severity of bad mental health in college students. These authors are alluding that these counselors are just going along with the act to cover their own asses.

For people who have trauma and anxiety with certain subjects, a trigger warning is issued. For example, when discussing sexual assault or discrimination in a public setting like a college, a trigger warning could be issued. However, some people are suggesting that trigger warnings have gone overboard on college campuses. The Atlantic’s Greg Lukianoff and Johnathan Haidt say, “A movement is arising, undirected and driven largely by students, to scrub campuses clean of words, ideas, and subjects that might cause discomfort or give offense.” These authors are acknowledging that there has recently been more support of removing potential “offensive” language and thinking from institutions. These authors are concluding that today’s kids are just too sensitive. The notion that “nobody can take a joke anymore” has overtaken some. Rutter and Mintz write, “Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Maher have publicly condemned the oversensitivity of college students, saying too many of them can’t take a joke.” Comedians that are brought to schools to bring laughter are refusing to attend due to the sensitivity on campus.

The authors and quotes I have cited bring up good points but ultimately, they biased. It is true that parenting has changed over the years. Parental figures get locked up now for hitting and giving “tough love” to their children. In response, new ways of parenting have taken place such as not saying no or letting children make their own decisions and deal with the consequence. And it is true to say that today’s society is becoming more woke. Protests and politics are at an all-time high and people are very passionate and defensive of their views. In a diverse place such as college, people are bound to bash heads with one another. With all these truths, it could be concluded that due to parenting and today’s society that the younger generation is just weaker. However, all these factors do not take away from the anxiety and depression students are experiencing at school and about their grades. Whichever way the child was brought up, does not take away from the stress that the school system is placing on them as young adults.

A majority of college students are too stressed and overwhelmed about their education. Mental health is suffering in exchange for a career. Today’s millennials and Gen Zer’s are living in a totally different world. It is unrealistic to not notice the changes of the times that leads the younger generation to be more sensitive.

References

Dreher, Diane E. Why Are Today’s College Students So Emotionally Fragile? (n.d.). Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/your-personal-renaissance/201508/why-are-today-s-college-students-so-emotionally-fragile

Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2015, September). The Coddling of the American Mind. The Atlantic; The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/

Rutter, Michael Patrick & Mintz, Steven. Higher Education Blogs | Blog U. (n.d.). http://Www.insidehighered.com. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/are-today%E2%80%99s-college-students-more-psychologically-fragile-past

Posted in Rebuttal Rewrite | 3 Comments

Rebuttal Argument- Indigo

Snowflake Generation

It is common for the older generations to critique Gen Z and millennials for being too sensitive. That “kids” now have it too easy. A particular subject of discussion for the older generation is how education has changed over the years. Grandpas around the world are used to telling their grandchildren that they had to walk five miles in the snow in order to get to school. They feel as though younger generations are too soft these days. Mental health and its severities are greatly contested amongst all age groups. Anxiety and depression from school could be all made up.

College is typically a time when students try to find out who they are. College kids experiment and try to find their place in the world. For the first time, many students are living out from under the watch of their parents. Parents play a crucial role in their child’s development. Psychology Today’s Diane E Dreher suggests that over controlling parents are to blame for their child’s school related anxiety. Dreher writes, “they frantically package them for success, protecting their children from failure while pressuring them to excel, doing their homework, making their decisions, and micromanaging their lives.” Dreher is commenting on how some parents choose to parent their children. She feels as though the parents are to blame for school related anxiety. There is no argument that parents cause school related stress for their children due to the pressure. However, it is called into question whether the parents are making their children “soft” which causes them to be overly anxious students. Or, if school is really that hard for the students of today, regardless of the way the children were parented.

Dreher furthers her stance by saying, “They experience greater distress and adjustment difficulties, putting overwhelming demands on college counseling centers.” Dreher is acknowledging that college aged kids have stress. Nowadays colleges have counseling and wellness centers. This concept can be lost on the older generation who maybe had a nurse/doctor on campus. Dreher is taking the responsibility of good mental health off the school and onto the student. Dreher is actually blaming the students for overcrowding the school counselors. By putting the blame on the students, she is inferring that it is today’s students that are the issue. That too many of them are having mental health issues.

When college kids do see the counselors, the counselors are ready to diagnose. Rutter and Mintz from Inside Higher Ed say, “where institutions, especially the best funded, have grown increasingly responsive to the psychological problems on their campuses – a response intensified by liability concerns.” These writers are alluding to the notion that high funded colleges are succumbing to the illusions of today’s students out of liability concerns. Rutter and Mintz are taking away the severity of bad mental health in college students. These authors are alluding that these counselors are just going along with the act to cover their own asses.

For people who have trauma and anxiety with certain subjects, a trigger warning is issued. For example, when discussing sexual assault or discrimination in a public setting like a college, a trigger warning could be issued. However, some people are suggesting that trigger warnings have gone overboard on college campuses. The Atlantic’s Greg Lukianoff and Johnathan Haidt say, “A movement is arising, undirected and driven largely by students, to scrub campuses clean of words, ideas, and subjects that might cause discomfort or give offense.” These authors are acknowledging that there has recently been more support of removing potential “offensive” language and thinking from institutions. These authors are concluding that today’s kids are just too sensitive. The notion that “nobody can take a joke anymore” has overtaken some. Rutter and Mintz write, “Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Maher have publicly condemned the oversensitivity of college students, saying too many of them can’t take a joke.” Comedians that are brought to schools to bring laughter are refusing to attend due to the sensitivity on campus.

The authors and quotes I have cited bring up good points but ultimately, they biased. It is true that parenting has changed over the years. Parental figures get locked up now for hitting and giving “tough love” to their children. In response, new ways of parenting have taken place such as not saying no or letting children make their own decisions and deal with the consequence. And it is true to say that today’s society is becoming more woke. Protests and politics are at an all-time high and people are very passionate and defensive of their views. In a diverse place such as college, people are bound to bash heads with one another. With all these truths, it could be concluded that due to parenting and today’s society that the younger generation is just weaker. However, all these factors do not take away from the anxiety and depression students are experiencing at school and about their grades. Whichever way the child was brought up, does not take away from the stress that the school system is placing on them as young adults.

A majority of college students are too stressed and overwhelmed about their education. Mental health is suffering in exchange for a career. The older generation didn’t have the internet, phones, or social media during their college years. At that time society wasn’t as accepting as it is today towards race, sexuality and gender. Today’s millennials and Gen Zer’s are living in a totally different world. It is unrealistic to not notice the changes of the times that leads the younger generation to be more sensitive.

References

Dreher, Diane E. Why Are Today’s College Students So Emotionally Fragile? (n.d.). Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/your-personal-renaissance/201508/why-are-today-s-college-students-so-emotionally-fragile

Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2015, September). The Coddling of the American Mind. The Atlantic; The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/

Rutter, Michael Patrick & Mintz, Steven. Higher Education Blogs | Blog U. (n.d.). http://Www.insidehighered.com. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/are-today%E2%80%99s-college-students-more-psychologically-fragile-past

Posted in Rebuttal Draft | 2 Comments

Research- Ericcartman

The Benefits of Art Therapy

Children and adolescents developmental stages cause a skew in how different therapy tactics are effective in reaching each individual. Art therapy is a method many art teachers and therapists have worked to collaborate on to develop a new form of therapeutic expression for adolescents. Art therapy holds many benefits and is much more widely applicable to adolescents than select forms of psychological therapy.

Art therapy is aimed at directing children’s reward pathways and allowing an alternate form of expression to help teach unique problem-solving. Using art to express an emotion or tell a story that, in some stages of development, children are limited in expressing or explaining verbally.

Fei-Ya Su’s students benefit from the “no wrong answers” approach to art therapy in the classroom.

One of the main goals she describes is one of the most common and ideal concepts that are seen through participating in art therapy. The overall goal of her therapy is to see students “come to class feeling that this was a safe place to explore their passions with no right or wrong answers or methodologies.”

Teenagers need to be reminded of this. They are highly self-critical and easily discouraged, and in many areas of their lives, they feel some external pressure to conform to their surroundings while growing up. But not in her classroom. In many ways, picking at a child’s brain causes  hyper-fixation on the problem at hand, emphasizing what is wrong and making the child feel criticized. Many teenagers are not ready for these tactics to be one of the first steps taken in receiving mental health treatment. In art therapy, the lines often get blurred on the therapeutic side, and many patients take it as an art education, which helps separate their mind from the direct problem and solve these issues subconsciously before having these revelations brought to their attention. In conducting an art therapy experiment with her students through studying art therapy, Fei-Ya Su discussed the outcome and reflection of her experiment.

“If I could do this class all over again, the change that I would consider making the most is to have students create an art journal and update it every day at home. This would have given them more opportunity to think about trying different art materials and generate new ideas that they could record and refer to come class time.”

Understanding a concept can sometimes be interpreted better from an alternate perspective. Participating in artistic expression, or a visual, carves out a new sensory implication in therapy practices rather than traditional verbal expression and adds a hands-on component that makes the patient feel as if they have more control over their situation, which has a heavy influence on their willingness to participate.

A research study, “A Systematic Narrative Review on Art Therapeutic Means and Forms of Expression, Therapist Behavior, and Supposed Mechanisms of Change,” was conducted by various researchers in an effort to prove how different applications of therapy impact qualifying adolescents.

“AT interventions for children and adolescents are characterized by a variety of materials and techniques, forms of structure such as giving topics or assignments, and the use of language. Three forms of therapist behavior were seen: non-directive, directive, and eclectic. All three forms of therapist behavior, in combination with a variety of means and forms of expression, showed significant effects on psychosocial problems.“

When applied in a flexible manner, art therapy is highly effective. In this experiment, the researchers studied the applicability of therapy to certain classifications of psychosocial behaviors the subjects were exhibiting; through this, they were able to determine how they can best execute these methods. Art therapy is not just a direct practice; there is more to it than just the simplicity of having a person sit in front of a canvas. There is an entire curriculum behind the practices of art therapy; just like the psychosocial sciences behind cognitive and behavioral therapy, art therapy has a variety of approaches adapted to the individual patient.

Throughout the copious experiments revolving around art therapy, many researchers have questioned the legitimacy of its effectiveness. In the study that was conducted by Bosgraaf, Spreen, Pattiselanno, and Van Hooren, they were able to compare and contrast a variety of psychosocial therapy practices with art. 

“The results showed that the use of means and forms of expression and therapist behavior is applied flexibly. This suggests the responsiveness of AT, in which means and forms of expression and therapist behavior are applied to respond to the client’s needs and circumstances, thereby giving positive results for psychosocial outcomes.”

There are many benefits from art therapy and overtime, has been found much more applicable to adolescents than select forms of psychological therapy. While behavioral, or cognitive, therapy, which stems from conditioning through verbal communication, allows for many of one’s psychosocial issues to be addressed directly, art therapy can construct itself to present patients with more direct tasks as well. There is a more loosely based science behind the variability of techniques this practice uses, which allows for it to be more applicable to different psychosocial issues displayed in children and adolescents. Being able to interpret the practices of art therapy and how they contrast with more routine and traditional therapeutic practices allows us to begin to see the psychological depth behind art.

Emotions are limitless, but we are reluctant to express most of them. Our individual emotional palettes differ; hence, psychologists struggle to achieve a therapy practice applicable to a wide range of emotional complications and disorders. Standard therapy practices, such as cognitive or behavioral therapy, treat only selective mental complications. So therapists must adapt their practices across multiple spectrums. As children age, art therapy is beneficial to adolescents because it is flexible and adaptable to individual circumstances, which is one of the pluses of incorporating creative expression into art therapy.

My mother has been an educator for 25 years, teaching classes for kindergarten through fifth graders. She discusses how incorporating art into her classes helps give her a better understanding of how to organize her class for the day. When her students enter her classroom, my mother has her students draw a picture of how their day is going. After reviewing the drawings, it helps give her a better idea of what type of book the students would be most interested in and whether they do art stations or independent reading as an activity afterwards. She noticed the rowdy behavior diminishing as these children all sat and drew about their day. While every student’s drawing was different, there was never a blank page. She noticed higher classroom engagement and a faster so-called “cool down time” from when they first walked into the library to when it was time to sit on the rug for group reading. This is just one example of how easily art can help influence a child’s behavior in an everyday setting, and not just an individual, but a class of 25 elementary schoolers. Not only does it benefit wellbeing, but it also allows for open communication with educators and authority figures.

 MaryGrace Berbarian discussed in her work “Creative Problem Solving in Art Therapy” The influences art therapy can have on a child’s resilience and problem-solving skills How many may wonder: How does painting or drawing a picture help you solve a problem in life?

It is common to categorize art therapy as one of the more frivolous practices in psychology, but many do not understand that there is more than just painting in art therapy; there is an entire curriculum behind it that can reach more patients than standard practices. Berbarian utilizes instances in which art therapy may be influential:

 “For example, the tolerable access of traumatic memories via art processes is encouraged by the trusting, empathic relationship with the therapist and the reward derived from the sensorially pleasurable creative process. Further, by safely re-encoding terrorizing memories through art therapy, the child can construct new options for safety through mirroring from the art therapist and reap the rewards of feeling validated.”

Many children cannot even begin to comprehend their feelings, let alone verbally explain them; sometimes the only thing they get is a picture in their heads. A way to show that emotion visually may be the easiest way to explain their innermost thoughts. Many children do not know how to confide in a stranger. When looking at a picture, it is an activity that coincides with children’s creative and developmental nature.Color theory discusses how many people can associate certain colors towards emotions subconsciously. Some instances of this can be a child being stuck in a dark red room, which could symbolize them being trapped in their own anger, or a child portraying their self-image much smaller than their parent may be their form of expressing how they feel belittled by that figure.

A Rowan University figure Jessica Anne Masino Drass published a paper on the programs of Rowan’s art therapy; in this, she includes a background on various tactics and studies revolving around the practice. In an effort to limit students’ disciplinary actions, they implemented an after-school art program and further recorded the results they uncovered through this program,  which consisted of a group of teenagers from South New Jersey.

“All of the students reported that they enjoyed being a part of the program and had fun at the meetings after school. What they enjoyed most about the program was creating a permanent public art project by being able to paint on the walls of the school. They also remarked that their involvement in the program gave them something positive to do with their time and kept them from getting into trouble outside of school.”

Many students displayed positive behavioral changes when they redirected their energy and also learned how to express their rebellion. While the drawing on walls was sanctioned, they still felt a thrill from participating in something that tends to lie outside the norm.

“By the end of the eight-week program, it was easy to see that a bond had grown between the five students, and they looked out for each other. At one meeting in particular, one of the students came in after school clearly upset about something. He had an incident with a teacher that brought him to tears. Instead of making fun of his emotions, the other students tried to calm him down and listened to him tell the story of what had happened to make him so upset. They also gave him suggestions on ways to remedy his situation in a positive way. When the program began, these were five high school students who didn’t know each other very well or at all, and by the end, they were sticking up for each other.”

Jessica’s program utilizing these South Jersey teens ended up having them grow a bond through art and cultivating a friendship through the group art sessions they attended. These students, all who had behavioral issues in school, many involving their peers, ended up understanding each other better through their art and felt special and unique through not only their work but the bonds they made.

As children grow through various psychosocial developmental stages, it is harder to determine what types of standard therapeutic practices are most beneficial to their specific circumstances. Through the examples shown, art therapy has been deemed successful on all different stages of development, considering the varying age groups shown of the children subjected to practicing art therapy. This is one of the reasons why art therapy is very attainable from different types of behavioral issues and specified circumstances.

It can be argued how to apply art therapy to patients; it can also be disputed whether or not these tactics work at all. Different behavioral issues, life circumstances, and obstacles all require different types of therapy in order to address the individual. Is art therapy capable of being applicable to everyone?

We have seen a vast majority of studies point towards art therapy being beneficial in aiding the mental health issues seen in youth. Art therapy is not solely used as the main form of therapy most of the time, but rather as an additional practice towards one’s ongoing treatment. But not everybody is equipped to gain a positive experience from this practice; as with any other form of therapy, some are more widely applicable to certain conditions than others.

In a Health Technology Assessment study revolving around the impacts of art therapy, it is seen that not all of the patients were positively impacted. While it was not deemed directly harmful, some patients claimed they simply did not see any effects, on either the positive or negative spectrum, that could play a role in how they were impacted emotionally by art therapy.

“More serious concerns included art therapy causing anxiety, increasing pain, and resulting in the activation of emotions that were not resolved. In one study, a participant was also concerned that art therapy may be harmful if the art therapist was not skilled. A final concern was that it may be harmful if art therapy is suddenly terminated. These findings were seen across only two studies, both in patients with cancer.”

Many individuals have certain comforts and outlets when it comes to taking a vulnerable stance with their emotions. In this example pulled from the study, the third chapter discussed how some recipients had concerns revolving around the therapist themselves, as in whether or not they would feel comfortable. This correlates to almost any therapeutic practice; the most critical thing firsthand is the bond or relationship between the patient and the therapist. In practicing art therapy, the fear of connecting with a therapist is one shared amongst any other therapist from any other field or practice. Whether it is communicative-based or expressive, a client-doctor relationship is always one of the main concerns in determining a patient’s comfort.

In the article Art in Times of Crisis by Edtya Zielinska, it discusses an art therapist named Rachel Brandoff, how she utilizes this therapy practice, and how she is able to connect it with clients. This example from the article shows firsthand how art therapy’s success is heavily dependent on how the therapist works with their clientele, in this case, a group of people struggling with domestic violence.

“As the weeks progressed, the projects became more complex and more intertwined with other members of the family: perhaps each person would make a component of a single piece. The final work was something they’d create as a team. They had the ability to plan and strategize, to communicate and negotiate, and they had the opportunity to get better at these skills. They had to work out their way of working together. This takes practice. What if someone in the family had all the voice? How does everyone get heard? There isn’t a single right way to be a family.  My job was to help them find their best way. Therapy is often about training to better handle the challenges in life, and in art therapy we can create smaller problems that aren’t life-interrupting and use that as a practice ground.”

Many of these practices’ main critics are those who tend to be more self-critical and cannot draw the line between doing something for a project versus for your own benefit. Hence, many stop art around age 11, when we begin to develop harsher criticisms of ourselves. But like the study and Rachel Brandoff’s practices, they were able to see how the therapist themselves does much of the work for their clients by being able to differentiate how art is used recreationally, goal-oriented, and therapeutically.

Art therapy is under the same criticism we see in therapists who just want to sit and talk with their clientele; it does not apply to everyone’s capacity for expressing emotions.

Rachel Brandoff further emphasizes this; 

“I’ve heard many people say that they don’t want to have to tell their whole story all over again. But we do that all the time in life anyway, and in therapy you can tell what you want in your own way. In art therapy, you don’t even have to tell it.”

This type of practice is not the traditional, orthodox forms of therapy that we have seen being used as a foundation for mental health and trauma treatment for decades. This type of therapy is an evolution of what we used to see in order to alleviate stressors and some of the harder parts of communicating. While it is possible to have a negative experience, this therapeutic method is still more widely applicable to adolescents than solely using other forms of psychotherapy. This problem solving is less direct than confronting a patient’s emotions; hence, it is easier for the perception of its effectiveness to be warped, as sometimes the slow buildup seen in this practice does not come with major revelations that may prompt one to see progress directly.

Therapy is different for all of its subjects, and there are many factors that play into how one may portray it, whether or not they are susceptible to outstanding contributing factors. Of course, a practice cannot apply to everyone, whether it’s your internal susceptibility or the therapists’ doing. It is frequently common for people to not want to complete therapy programs, giving a stain on many’s perceptions of looking for help. The public’s opinion stemming from this is what has created an overshadowing about how, if applied correctly, art therapy can be applied across a variety of ages as well as behavioral issues.

References

Berberian, Marygrace. (2019). Creative Problem Solving in Art Therapy. file:///Users/bellaaquilino/Downloads/Art_Therapy_Practices_for_Resilient_Youth_Berberian_CreativeProblemSolving.pdf

Bosgraaf L, Spreen M, Pattiselanno K, van Hooren S. Art Therapy for Psychosocial Problems in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Narrative Review on Art Therapeutic Means and Forms of Expression, Therapist Behavior, and Supposed Mechanisms of Change. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 8 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33132993/

Drass, Jessica Anne Masino, “Using art to teach problem-solving and other social skills: the effectiveness of the RATE Program” (2009) https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/607 

Su, Fei-Ya, “How Can Students Use Art to Learn Problem Solving?” (2020). Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8136

Uttley L, Scope A, Stevenson M, et al. Systematic review and economic modelling of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of art therapy among people with non-psychotic mental health disorders. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015 Mar. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 19.18.) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279634/ doi: 10.3310/hta19180

Zielinska, E. (2020, June 23). Art in times of crisis. The Nexus. https://nexus.jefferson.edu/health/art-in-times-of-crisis/

Posted in Research Position Paper | 1 Comment

Rebuttal rewrite- ericcartman

The Pros and Cons of Art Therapy

It can be argued how to apply art therapy to patients; it can also be disputed whether or not these tactics work at all. Different behavioral issues, life circumstances, and obstacles all require different types of therapy in order to address the individual. Is art therapy capable of being applicable to everyone?

We have seen a vast majority of studies point towards art therapy being beneficial in aiding the mental health issues seen in youth. Art therapy is not solely used as the main form of therapy most of the time, but rather as an additional practice towards one’s ongoing treatment. But not everybody is equipped to gain a positive experience from this practice; as with any other form of therapy, some are more widely applicable to certain conditions than others.

In a Health Technology Assessment study revolving around the impacts of art therapy, it is seen that not all of the patients were positively impacted. While it was not deemed directly harmful, some patients claimed they simply did not see any effects, on either the positive or negative spectrum, that could play a role in how they were impacted emotionally by art therapy.

More serious concerns included art therapy causing anxiety, increasing pain, and resulting in the activation of emotions that were not resolved. In one study, a participant was also concerned that art therapy may be harmful if the art therapist was not skilled. A final concern was that it may be harmful if art therapy is suddenly terminated. These findings were seen across only two studies, both in patients with cancer.

Many individuals have certain comforts and outlets when it comes to taking a vulnerable stance with their emotions. In this example pulled from the study, the third chapter discussed how some recipients had concerns revolving around the therapist themselves, as in whether or not they would feel comfortable. This correlates to almost any therapeutic practice; the most critical thing firsthand is the bond or relationship between the patient and the therapist. In practicing art therapy, the fear of connecting with a therapist is one shared amongst any other therapist from any other field or practice. Whether it is communicative-based or expressive, a client-doctor relationship is always one of the main concerns in determining a patient’s comfort.

In the article Art in Times of Crisis by Edtya Zielinska, it discusses an art therapist named Rachel Brandoff, how she utilizes this therapy practice, and how she is able to connect it with clients. This example from the article shows firsthand how art therapy’s success is heavily dependent on how the therapist works with their clientele, in this case, a group of people struggling with domestic violence.

As the weeks progressed, the projects became more complex and more intertwined with other members of the family: perhaps each person would make a component of a single piece. The final work was something they’d create as a team. They had the ability to plan and strategize, to communicate and negotiate, and they had the opportunity to get better at these skills. They had to work out their way of working together. This takes practice. What if someone in the family had all the voice? How does everyone get heard? There isn’t a single right way to be a family.  My job was to help them find their best way. Therapy is often about training to better handle the challenges in life, and in art therapy we can create smaller problems that aren’t life-interrupting and use that as a practice ground.

Many of these practices’ main critics are those who tend to be more self-critical and cannot draw the line between doing something for a project versus for your own benefit. Hence, many stop art around age 11, when we begin to develop harsher criticisms of ourselves. But like the study and Rachel Brandoff’s practices, they were able to see how the therapist themselves does much of the work for their clients by being able to differentiate how art is used recreationally, goal-oriented, and therapeutically.

Art therapy is under the same criticism we see in therapists who just want to sit and talk with their clientele; it does not apply to everyone’s capacity for expressing emotions.

Rachel Brandoff further emphasizes this; 

I’ve heard many people say that they don’t want to have to tell their whole story all over again. But we do that all the time in life anyway, and in therapy you can tell what you want in your own way. In art therapy, you don’t even have to tell it.

This type of practice is not the traditional, orthodox forms of therapy that we have seen being used as a foundation for mental health and trauma treatment for decades. This type of therapy is an evolution of what we used to see in order to alleviate stressors and some of the harder parts of communicating. While it is possible to have a negative experience, this therapeutic method is still more widely applicable to adolescents than solely using other forms of psychotherapy. This problem solving is less direct than confronting a patient’s emotions; hence, it is easier for the perception of its effectiveness to be warped, as sometimes the slow buildup seen in this practice does not come with major revelations that may prompt one to see progress directly.

Therapy is different for all of its subjects, and there are many factors that play into how one may portray it, whether or not they are susceptible to outstanding contributing factors. Of course, a practice cannot apply to everyone, whether it’s your internal susceptibility or the therapists’ doing. It is frequently common for people to not want to complete therapy programs, giving a stain on many’s perceptions of looking for help. The public’s opinion stemming from this is what has created an overshadowing about how, if applied correctly, art therapy can be applied across a variety of ages as well as behavioral issues.

References

Uttley L, Scope A, Stevenson M, et al. Systematic review and economic modelling of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of art therapy among people with non-psychotic mental health disorders. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015 Mar. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 19.18.) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279634/ doi: 10.3310/hta19180

Zielinska, E. (2020, June 23). Art in times of crisis. The Nexus. https://nexus.jefferson.edu/health/art-in-times-of-crisis/

Posted in Rebuttal Rewrite | 1 Comment

Rebuttal Draft – HurtNowitzki

Coach Prime or “Primetime” Deion Sanders?… Same Thing.

Many critics have Coach Deion Sanders or “Coach Prime’s” recruiting techniques under significant ridicule due to his harsh delivery and what some perceive as a diva attitude. However I’d like to point out that those same attributes many are against and criticizing may not be as bizarre as the world sees them and in fact may be what attract the likes of high level or star recruits in the first place.

As the season concluded Coach Prime’s Colorado Buffs finished with an overall record of 4-8. Now that isn’t the greatest show out for a team that had the anticipation of Colorado’s prior to the season due to their acquisition of Coach Prime. However it is still an improvement compared  to their overall record from the previous year, where they finished 1-11 under head coach Karl Dorrell. Due to this improvement of their win-loss record, it would be a sign of ignorance to declare that Coach Prime hasn’t proved himself worthy of the position but also displaying his knowledge of the game itself.

Ari Wasserman, a senior writer for The Athletic published an article titled “Deion Sanders’ poor recruiting results major issue for Colorado’s build” . In this article Wasserman makes a claim in regards to Coach Prime’s blunt honesty with his players and their value witin the team,  “That’s treating players like commodities, and it’s a tough sell for future recruiting efforts, both in the high school ranks and in the portal.” Even though there may be some truth to this statement, it seems Wasserman may have a small amount of bias when it comes to Coach Prime and his team.

“Treating players like commodities.” In this statement Wasserman neglects to acknowledge the amount of pressure Coach Prime is under enduring as the world waits for him to turn yet another struggling program into a more feared and winning one. As stated earlier in my writing it only took Coach Prime roughly a year to turn Jackson St. into a winning football program. In order to do this Coach Prime bolstered his roster with many high rated recruits and as the season began, based on performance put better players in starting positions.

 Now, on a Nationally Televised Division I level the world awaits Coach Prime’s triumph yet again. It is ridiculous to think that he would take his foot off the pedal, as a viewer you have to realize that Coach Prime’s main focus is to build his team and put them in the best position for them to succeed. Which means that if he feels as though the players on his roster aren’t meeting expectations he has the right to sit them or even suggest a transfer to another program with a system they may fit better in.

In the article Wasserman also brings into question the physical aspects of Prime’s recruiting. Wasserman states “Then it got me thinking: When was the last time you saw a picture of Sanders at a high school? Or doing an in-home visit?”. As we read we find that during recruitment of arguably Coach Prime’s best signing in his coaching career Travis Hunter who played for him at both Jackson State and now Colorado in fact did not include Prime visiting the High School for which Hunter played for. Instead this 5 star player’s recruitment consisted of something as minimal as a Facetime call.

When diving into Coach Prime’s recruiting techniques it’s evident that his reputation plays a huge factor in that not too many think of when commenting on the efficiency of his recruiting itself . 

Wasserman claims “You may call that powerful recruiting, and it is. But that isn’t going to cut it when you’re trying to build a Power 5 program.”  The issue with this statement is that if Coach Prime was able to attract and sign who was said to be the nations highest ranking recruit in the class of 2022 among other notable recruits to a low exposure and struggling program via a series of video calls and have success with the program. How could we possibly dismiss the idea of him having the same impact going into this next year after Colorado showing an improvement compared to previous seasons?

Later in the article Wasserman makes the claim “Eventually, though, Sanders is going to have to stop being a celebrity and start being a Power 5 football coach.” This statement stood out more than anything else I read before. For this statement I want to divert our attention to Deion Sanders’ legacy prior to coaching. Deion Sanders was a Hall of Fame, multisport, multipositional athlete who’s impact as well as success earned him the nickname “PrimeTime”.

As I stated before Deion Sanders’ legacy as an athlete is what makes him the iconic coach everybody has their eyes on as he enters his next year with The Buffs.

His legacy aids to what can be referred to as “celebrity endorsement”. Due to Deions success as an athlete, when coaching his players gain more exposure for playing under his leadership even are presented with the opportunity of meeting and possibly making connections with some of the world’s most popular celebrities. This interaction is described in “What it’s like to be recruited by Deion Sanders” an ESPN article by Staff Writer, Tom Vanhaaren. Vanhaaren recalls Colorado’s game against Colorado in early october. 

“WHEN ADRIAN WALKER scheduled his unofficial visit to Colorado for the Week 3 game against Colorado State, he had no idea he’d be there with Lil Wayne, Master P, Offset and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson. But that’s exactly where Walker and the other recruits on campus found themselves, in what is now the new norm with Deion Sanders and the Colorado Buffaloes. It’s not just locker room tours and meetings with coaches, recruits are seeing a whole different pitch from Sanders and his staff.”

Coach Primes diva or celebrity status is an amazing element to what makes him a great recruiter. Essentially sweetening the deal for incoming recruits. After all, who shies away from the opportunity to have some of the worlds most influential and famed people come to see you play?

References

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/38555810/how-deion-sanders-recruits

https://theathletic.com/5094370/2023/11/28/deion-sanders-colorado-recruiting-decommitment/#

https://www.gainesville.com/story/sports/columns/2023/04/28/deion-sanders-guilty-of-unnecessary-roughness-with-colorado-housecleaning/70147949007/

Posted in Rebuttal Draft | 2 Comments

Research—Youngthug03

How can Americans stay healthy with
all these flaws within the healthcare system? 

Many people see the United States as one of the most significant countries in the world. How can this be when one of the most essential systems, the healthcare system, is not the strongest it can be? Many countries worldwide have a free healthcare system that citizens can access when needed. However, that is not the case in the US. The US healthcare system causes many Americans to choose not to see a doctor due to the unreasonable cost. Many things are implemented to help Americans afford medical attention when necessary, like insurance, Medicare, and places like retail health clinics. Yet, these implements still have many flaws that come with them. 

Americans unfortunately don’t have the leisure to just go to the hospital or doctor when needed as citizens in many other countries do. They will pay a lot for health insurance that only partially covers their doctor visits. Around 15% of Americans don’t even have insurance due to its high costs and the little coverage it gives. Americans who do have insurance are forced to pay high prices since there are not many insurance companies, and because of that, these insurance companies can charge whatever they please. The article “Is our Healthcare System broken?” states, “High costs combined with high numbers of underinsured or uninsured means many people risk bankruptcy if they develop a serious illness.” The high costs of medical attention in the US can have severe and detrimental consequences that come with it. These adverse effects on Americans can trickle down their lives, causing many different things, like debt. Unlike citizens in other countries, they have to think twice when seeking medical attention for any sickness or injury. 

Another way the US healthcare system also tries to help Americans afford medical attention after age sixty-five through Medicare. Americans pay for Medicare through taxes all their life till they are sixty-five years old when they are eligible for it. Medicare provides help for over sixty million seniors or disabled Americans every day. However, even after paying for Medicare through taxes for sixty-five years, it still has many flaws that come with it. One of the significant flaws of Medicare is the added out-of-pocket expenses that Medicare does not cover. Many Americans with Medicare are retired and no longer have an income so these extra out-of-pocket expenses can cause a burden to these senior citizens.  The article “What Are the Pros and Cons of Medicare?” states, “Some beneficiaries may choose to enroll in a Medicare Advantage plan because these plans are required to include an annual out-of-pocket spending limit.

Other beneficiaries may choose instead to apply for a Medicare Supplement Insurance plan, which pays for certain out-of-pocket costs such as Medicare copays, coinsurance, deductibles, and more.” Considering what has been stated, Americans with Medicare need to pay monthly for supplemental plans that will cover the out-of-pocket costs that they would have to pay otherwise if they just had Medicare. With this being said, the only pro to this kind of plan is eliminating the surprise out-of-pocket costs that come with the visits for these Americans. However, not all Americans can afford to pay extra monthly for a better insurance plan to cover the out-of-pocket expenses and are forced to pay the out-of-pocket expenses after doctor visits or medical attention.

Some Americans may find that the extra plan is unnecessary due to it not constantly breaking even with the amount of money they would have to pay monthly to cover the out-of-pocket costs when they cannot predict how much they would have to spend on out-of-pocket costs. Furthermore, the article “What Are the Pros and Cons of Medicare?” states, “While Medicare is widely accepted across the U.S., it’s not necessarily accepted by every health care provider.” Therefore, after all of the money spent towards Medicare through taxes and if the American pays an additional amount of money monthly for a supplemental plan, they can still find a disadvantage within the medicare plan of not being accepted by all healthcare providers. 

Additionally, the US healthcare system has retail clinics that can benefit many Americans, but that comes at a cost. Most Americans will choose to go to retail health clinics for their affordable prices and time efficiency. Yet, these retail healthcare clinics are only sometimes seen as providing the best care. In the article “Retail health clinics: The pros and cons,” it states, “Geriatrician Dr. Suzanne Salamon, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School, is concerned that the details of a patient’s visit to a retail health clinic might not be sent to her. Although clinics offer this service, not everyone takes them up on it. ‘The risk with that is, scattered care from multiple places can lead to mix-ups,’ says Dr. Salamon. ‘And if people don’t bring their complete medication lists to a clinic, the clinic may prescribe something that will interact with medications they’re taking.” It has been found that these retail health clinics may not be fully treating their patients at their highest capability due to a lack of knowledge. With this occurring, patients who choose this route when seeking medical attention might worsen their health due to choosing to go to a retail health clinic compared to their primary doctor for the low cost or time efficiency of the retail health clinic. 

References

Shmerling , R. H. (2021, July 13). Is our healthcare system broken? Hardvard Health Publishing. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/is-our-healthcare-system-broken-202107132542#:~:text=The%20cost%20is%20enormous%201%20High%20cost%2C%20not,bankruptcy%20if%20they%20develop%20a%20serious%20illness.%20

Worstell , C. (2023, October 27). What Are the Pros and Cons of Medicare? Help Advisor. https://www.helpadvisor.com/medicare/pros-and-cons-of-medicare

Godman, H. (2016, January 15). Retail health clinics: The pros and cons. Harvard Health Publishing. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/retail-health-clinics-the-pros-and-cons-201601158979

Posted in Research Position Paper | 1 Comment

Research Position Paper- BlogUser246

Behind the Veil

 As we enter a time when the public demands that corporations both be economically sustainable and make environmental improvements, companies are cracking under the pressure to keep up. Chevron, Exxon/ Mobil, BP, and other massive contributors to carbon emission pollution, attempt to hide their planet-killing practices from the public through “greenwashing,” highlighting small environmentally beneficial practices to divert attention from their assault on the planet we all depend on to sustain human life. Companies are trying to shift towards being eco-friendly businesses where consumers are comfortable with spending their money but are lacking transparency to what happens behind the scenes.

It should be no surprise environmental changes need to be made; global warming has been on the rise for quite a while now, since the 1950s to be specific. As the world continues to develop, mass production also continues to “help” with all of the technological advancements. This is what birthed large companies, leading to uncontrollable pollution that is becoming irreversible. According to the Carbon Disclosure Project, a non-profit that manages environmental impacts, just 100 companies are responsible for 71 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions alone. We cannot argue the facts, the large fossil fuel companies are the problem, and the greenwashing is hard to decipher from the truth.

A major contribution to greenwashing is the government turning a blind eye when companies outright lie to the public. For instance, one of the largest, and widely used oil companies in the United States, Chevron, has been in the spotlight for quite some time because of their mass contribution of greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere. They contributed 697 million tons of CO2 togreenhousegas emissions according to Client Earth’s greenwashing files in 2019. Since being exposed, they have promised to progress towards a low carbon future by 2050 but have only been putting .2 per cent of their capital towards this project between 2010-2018. They are fabricating any promises they have made by putting pocket change into their goals. This is possibly one of the worst greenwashing cases we have seen, but the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System claims that Chevron “remains in compliance with federal, state and local water regulatory standards.” It would be hard to believe that the people in power are not working for the best interests of the people, but the evidence proves their neglectful behavior.

Many companies have started to share similar goals that want to produce fewer damaging products by using recyclable materials such as rPET (recyclable polyethylene terephthalate). This material is versatile and sustainable, so numerous companies are trying to get their hands on it to reach their recycling goals. Karen Ho says in her sustainability article, “To meet the recycling goals of US beverage brands, an estimated 1.1 billion pounds of food-grade rPET will be needed in the next decade — almost three times the amount produced in 2017.” The problem with a rise in demand is also the price rises, which causes companies to back away from sustainability claims. When it comes down to money or the environment, money is prioritized. Companies start to fabricate what materials they are using to appeal to consumers and save their money.

A material that is cheaper than rPET is Virgin Polyethylene terephthalate (vPET), a plastic manufacturing material that is in its purest form. Robin Hicks states in his article that vPET has fallen to $500-600 a ton while rPET is double the price around $1,000 a ton. This price gap encourages companies to take the cheaper way out by using one time use plastics and claiming them to be recycled materials. According to Dr. Steve Wong, “it’s also hard for companies that buy polymers to use in their packaging to distinguish between the plastic types without laboratory testing.” This testing could prove the authenticity of the plastic companies’ claim to use, but it is near impossible to test every individual item made. One example is ensuring beverage bottles that are labeled as recycled plastic, like Coca-Cola, are truly recyclable. When diving into further research, only 25 per cent of the bottle is actually recycled plastic while the 75 per cent that remains is Virgin Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) according to Beth Newhard in her article, “Plastic vs. Plastic: Which Packaging is Best. Companies use vPET material to greenwash their consumers into thinking their products are being recycled, but really have ended up in landfills, adding to the mass of pollution that ends up in our atmosphere.

Environmental credentials are made by many companies, but not all of them reach the high bar that they set for themselves. One of the biggest food distributers, Nestle, has been named the top plastic polluters in the world for three consecutive years according to “Break free From Plastic” 2020 annual report. This has led them to promote their “ambitions” about being 100 per cent recyclable by 2025, but the campaign was not backed with any proof. Nestle’s form of greenwashing is subtle but there, they claim they are moving towards being recyclable but have no existing targets to hit according to Perry Wheeler in his “Greenpeace” article. A large company that contributes to this much waste for many years should have a bigger plan than just feeding the public outright lies through their campaigns.

The numerous companies that are relying on greenwashing to appeal to their audience has increased in recent years. Consumers want to see changes made in their campaigns that show they are willing to switch to eco-conscious habits even though it takes some muscle. Fabrication, outright lies, and propaganda are the only appropriate terms to use when referring to the countless greenwashing campaigns that have been exposed and that are continuing to be investigated. Companies promote misleading environmental sustainability efforts that are actually hiding the public from the harsh truths of destructive business practices.

By promoting their misleading sustainability efforts, companies greenwash their image to hide their environmentally destructive business practices from the public. They divert the market’s attention toward a positive achievement, large or small, to distract consumers from their contributions to pollution. The misleading social media and news campaigns keep the public ignorant of their real investment into their planet-killing activities. The planet pays the price for corporate propaganda.

An issue we are seeing with fossil fuel companies is not only their pollution, but also their donations to colleges who are conducting climate research. If we continue to let fossil fuel companies donate to research projects that contradict their business, we continue to let them have the upper hand in what is actually allowed to be studied. These enormous donations to research groups do not go unnoticed so the companies specifically want the donations they made to be publicized so consumers think they are working towards a greener future, but sadly they just want to take control. In a Yale Climate Connection interview, Bella Kumar, a Fossil Fuel research student at George Washington University, “funders can influence which topics are studied. And in some cases, they influence how results are framed, for example downplaying the negative impacts of burning fossil fuels.” Throwing money around is the easiest way for companies to lie about their intentions and continue emitting fossil fuels into the atmosphere.

When people see positive promotions from their favorite companies planning environmentally friendly efforts, the more greenwashing the companies are able to get away with. Polluters make promises in these campaigns that they do not intend to keep. They are unleashing advertisements for their green campaigns with no actual concrete evidence to support it. By making vague claims saying that they have ambitions to move towards being net-zero, they are secretly granting themselves years of good grace until they return saying their ambitions failed. There is a difference between making a pledge about what you want to achieve, and taking meaningful actions that will actually take you there.

“Companies should be saying exactly how they’re going to reduce their emissions all the way to zero, if they have to rely on offsets — where are those offsets coming from? How credible is the offset company that they’re working with?”

If offsetting is a solution to their own pollution problem, it is clear that these companies have no intention of making needed changes to their own habits. They think paying another company to fix their problems offsets their own pollution, which it does not. If companies continue to use offsetting as a “solution” to their own problems, then their pollution will cause irreversible damage much quicker.  According to Angel Hsu, data scientist and founder of Data Driven EnviroLab, if companies are being secretive about their plans to reduce their emissions, then there is likely no plan at all.

Since the COVID-19 epidemic, companies have depended more than ever on promising to work toward open-ended goals to earn customer loyalty. “While consumers have long said that they value sustainability, the COVID-19 crisis perceptibly shifted consumer behavior and enlarged the pool of conscientious consumers willing to pay more for healthier, safer, more environmentally and socially conscious products and brands,” according to PwC research team. Having said, companies do not want to lose their customers because they do not have a plan that involves them moving to net-zero emissions, so developing open-ended goals is the best way to appease consumers for the short-term. Companies pulling publicity stunts to keep their business flow going is only putting off the inevitable of eventually being exposed for nonexistent goals. The cycle continues to go around and around with greenwashing.

A recent tactic from fossil fuel companies is silencing protests that fight against them. Protestors have been attempting to exploit these reckless companies and break the silence on how they are the reason for climate change. Companies can lie about what they are doing behind the scenes, but when it comes into the vision of the public, there is little they can do, or so we think. In Nina Lakhani’s anti-protest research, she interviewed Greenpeace director, Ebony Twilley Martin, who claims, “We are seeing an escalation of tactics to criminalize, bully, and sue those working for climate action, Indigenous rights and environmental justice… [as] oil and gas companies find new ways to delay the transition to clean energy and protect their own profits.” With fossil fuel companies silencing the voices of the public, there is little ways to spread awareness of the damage they are doing to the planet. With over 250 anti-protest bills in place, these environment activists are facing life-altering risks to try and continue the fight against fossil fuel companies and their destruction.

Fossil fuel companies are fighting against the people in order to keep their cash flow going. Greenwashing is not a singular tactic but an array of techniques that include lies, intimidation, deceitful research, vague goals, and happy talk, among others. These sneaky tactics allow them to continue being vicious towards our environment. They are working tirelessly to keep their destructive pollution in the dark, and it is working. Uncovering the lies is the first step to take down greenwashing and the reckless pollution it brings.

Now, more than ever, the world is seeing a climate crisis in full effect, and we need to do a quick 180 before it is too late. Even though companies understand that their contribution to irreversible damage needs to be addressed immediately, they are still snapping back at criticism from the public. The problem that corporates are facing is being exposed in the news for their lack of progress towards the environmental sustainability claims they have made.

Nestle did not make a rigorous plan that had clear goals to achieve and correct their destruction. Their lack of transparency hints toward them greenwashing the public to keep us quiet while they continue to destroy our planet. Georgina Rannard in a BBC News article describes the situation in which Nestle feels under attack for their lack of substance of efforts to reduce climate change by picking on the reporters from the New Climate Institute’s Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor (CCRM). “Nestle commented: ‘We welcome scrutiny of our actions and commitments on climate change. However, the CCRM report lacks understanding of our approach and contains significant inaccuracies.’” Nestle is clearly irritated with the news, but if the claims are inaccurate, Nestle would be less reluctant to release their successes to the world. This just means they likely have no goals or progress to share. Mark Schneiders includes Nestle’s ambitions for climate change in his article, “Nestlé CEO: We don’t have to sacrifice shareholders to fight climate change.”

“Nestlé operates in nearly every country in the world, and the decisions we make can drive change in the food industry. We do not take that responsibility lightly. We have never wavered in our support for the Paris Agreement—no matter how the political winds have shifted—and we have publicly detailed our commitment to halve our greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.”

Perry Wheeler, in his Greenpeace article, emphasized, “The statement is full of ambiguous or nonexistent targets, relies on ambitions’ to do better, and puts the responsibility on consumers rather than the company to clean up its own plastic pollution,” while he discusses how Nestle fails to hit their very far-reaching targets.

In an article published by Underwriters Laboratories Solutions, they identified the seven sins of greenwashing that simply explains the tactics companies are using to get by. The seven sins are: hidden trade-offs where the company admits to doing something bad but offers something good for balance. The lack of proof in which a company offers unsupported claims of having achieved green goals. Vagueness, in which is so poorly defined that there is room for misunderstanding with consumers, allowing the company not to be held down to claims. Worshipping false labels, in which a product has words or images that give a nonexistent 3rd party endorsement. Irrelevance, when a claim is made but it is unimportant to the environmental efforts. The lesser of the two evils, when a claim can be true but is used to distract consumers from worse catastrophic impact. Lastly, fibbing, where claims are outright false that claim to be certified. A fine list, to which I will add one I have seen more often than any other, the sin of making unrealistic predictions. A majority of the companies I have researched have committed this sin while developing sustainability claims because they are just unattainable with the current position they are in; for example, Nestle.

 The article states that “based on the results of the original study and subsequent studies, the Seven Sins of Greenwashing were developed to help consumers identify products that made misleading environmental claims.” In the case above, Nestle takes part in the sin of no proof and vagueness, encouraging the public to conclude that they are making changes. The circumstance they were put in should have been forceful enough to share all the great work and progress taking place, but instead it just proved that their vagueness and lack of proof is massive greenwashing.

Since all this backlash from the public on companies such as Nestle, other companies are starting to feel the heat as well. Specifically, BlackRock investment company, the second largest fossil fuel contributor in the world, has been receiving pressure from the public to release their ambitions about investing with companies who are not making environmental changes. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, responded, “BlackRock argues that its investments are consistent with a commitment to a responsible and orderly — rather than recklessly rushed — energy transition, as well as the realities of global energy needs after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.” Fink’s response was clear, he is staying invested in fossil fuel companies until the world proves it can do without them. His pushing off of a response to the public and becoming defensive that his company and he are being “recklessly rushed,” proves that he stands against the green side and stands with planet extinction habits. BlackRock, and their billion-dollar investments, plan to continue supporting fossil fuel companies because crippling the industry would be disastrous. They will continue with funding, and these businesses’ destruction will continue to expand.

“On the issue of climate change, BlackRock has sought to strike a balance, continuing to invest in fossil fuel companies while nudging them to adopt energy transition plans. It has projected that by 2030 at least three quarters of its investments will be with issuers of securities that have scientific targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions on a net basis.”

Larry Fink is a prime contributor to companies advancing their planet polluting activities because he is the one who funds their entire operation. When making claims that still include expansion of mass destruction, public concern should be sparked since he is using terms such as “nudging” when he should be making an ULTIMATIUM. Without the millions and billions of dollars he provides to these companies, they would not survive, so the best action he can take is asserting his dominance in the situation. He should not be ENCOURAGING environmentally positive business practices; he should be mandating them in order for companies to even pursue or continue business contracts with him.

References

Wong, S. & Hicks, R. (2020, May 28). Cheap virgin plastic is being sold as recycled plastic—it’s time for better recycling certification. Eco-Business.

Wheeler, P. (2018, April 10). Nestlé misses the mark with statement on tackling its single-use plastics problem. Greenpeace USA.

Ho, K. K. (n.d.). Companies like Nestle and Coca-Cola are eager to use more recycled material — here’s why that actually raises concerns over long-term sustainability goals. Business Insider.

Hsu, A. (2023, January 10). Data-driven EnviroLab tracks climate action. UNC Global. https://global.unc.edu/news-story/data-driven-envirolab-tracks-climate-action/

PricewaterhouseCoopers. (n.d.). 2021 consumer intelligence series survey on ESG. PwC. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/consulting/library/consumer-intelligence-series/consumer-and-employee-esg-expectations.html

Team, YCC. (2023, May 18). The fossil fuel industry is donating hundreds of millions to university climate and Energy Research ” yale climate connections. Yale Climate Connections. https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2023/05/the-fossil-fuel-industry-is-donating-hundreds-of-millions-to-university-climate-and-energy-research/

Halper, E. (2023, May 19). Is BlackRock’s Larry Fink blowing it for the climate? Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/05/06/blackrock-esg-climate-woke/

UL Solutions. (2019). Sins of Greenwashing. UL. https://www.ul.com/insights/sins-greenwashing

Rannard, G. (2022, February 7). Climate change: Top companies exaggerating their progress – study. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-60248830

Binnie, I. (2023, June 26). BlackRock’s Fink says he’s stopped using “weaponised” term ESG. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/blackrocks-fink-says-hes-stopped-using-weaponised-term-esg-2023-06-26/

Posted in Research Position Paper | 4 Comments