5 Sources & Summaries – nobinaryneeded

Stigma: Alive and Well – Sadie F. Dingfelder 

With the stigma surrounding mental health it allows for people to diminish their illnesses without any recognition from their loved ones. The reason most of them do not get help is due to the stigma’s creation, fear of others finding out and fears of their reactions. Part of that is due to the fact that people have been led to believe that mentally ill people are violent. The general public today are two times as likely to believe mentally ill people are violent than they were in the 1950s. Due to this, a number of tragic events have been linked to mental illness such as shootings, and women drowning their children in bathtubs. Those who shield their mental illness risk worsening their illness, though they don’t seem to care because they are more concerned with what people have to say about it, meanwhile social supports are much needed for recovery. The stigma against mental illness is making the population of the mentally ill scared, which is the opposite of what they need.

http://www.apa.org/monitor/2009/06/stigma.aspx

Too Many Self-Inflicted Deaths – Hilary Smith Connery, MD, PhD

The 8th leading cause of mortality in the United States is self-harm, suicide leading behind at number ten. These stats scream out for finding the root of the problem and more effective treatment systems. People are treated negatively and that needs to be avoided. The general public needs to realize that brain diseases are a chronic illness, such as a broken leg or diabetes. Such as those disorders, they can be treated with medication and therapy can be used to help treat. Though most people don’t ask for help due to the fact that they are scared of being viewed negatively, believing they can solve their own issues over time. Ending the stigma is one of the best ways to help these people, and that can be done by talking about it. They need to get the facts down, educate children and loved ones, even if you’re not sure it’ll make a difference, because in the end, it will.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mclean-hospital/too-many-self-inflicted-d_b_14395928.html

The Stigma of Mental Illness is Making Us Sicker

Why Mental Illness Should be a Public Health Priority

In 1999, the U.S. Surgeon General labeled stigma as the biggest barrier to mental health care. The stigma creates Social Distancing, meaning people with mental issues are more isolated from others, which enhances the stigma. The World Health Organization and World Economic Forum says mental illness is the biggest economic burden of any health issue. 60% of people in the US don’t receive care, while in developing countries, 90% don’t receive care. The stigma begins at an early age where children are used to calling people “weird” or “crazy” which follows them into adulthood. These negative stereotypes lead perceptions that the mentally ill are dangerous, which is shown in the media, especially movies. One movie portraying a victim of Multiple Personality Disorder called, Split, has the man committing kidnapping and murders, negatively portraying the sufferers of MPD. The social isolation takes a toll on the mentally ill, causing them to feel more alone than they already do. The stigma causes victims to suppress their anxiety or depression which worsens their conditions. It also results in a lower prioritization of public resources.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/brick-brick/201405/the-stigma-mental-illness-is-making-us-sicker

Cost of Not Caring: Stigma Set in Stone

Mental illness is a separate and unequal system. Mentally ill people face legal discrimination, codified for 50 years into federal law. Lack of funding equals lack of care, leaving mentally ill in jail or on the streets. In the US, hospitals fair to provide basic sources for the mental illness population, something other countries would never do for patients with cancer. Systems like Medicaid fail to provide treatment because Congress didn’t want to waste money on the mentally ill. Denying the mentally ill treatment essentially tells the country that the mentally ill are less deserving of a decent life than the general public. Those who go untreated result in disastrous events such as suicide. If it were cancer, the government would be funding it like no tomorrow, but because of the stigma, they fail to see the severity of mental illness. Some hospitals will even turn away patients at the door, deeming them not “sick enough” for a consult. Congress didn’t want to “waste” their money on the mentally ill which has been feeding into the stigma for years on end.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/25/stigma-of-mental-illness/9875351/

Breaking America’s Mental Health Stigma – Gabe Duverge

The NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health) disclosed that about 40% of individuals go untreated for their mental illness because of the mental health stigma. One claim of stigma is the disorder or getting help would equal weakness. “Individuals with mental health problems have always struggled to receive proper care and attention they need.” The stigma has been going on since the Middle Ages, where mentally ill people were thought to have been possessed. Later on in the movement to improve treatment, President Reagan signed Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act to protect mentally ill patients. This wasn’t exactly enough to end the stigma. There are two specific stigma’s for a few specific disorders: Depression, bipolar disorder, and female hysteria. One stigma is the social stigma, discrimination against the mentally ill, some violent. It’s more likely that instead of being violent themselves, the mentally ill are subjected to violence by the public. Then we have perceived stigma or self-stigma, where the patient prevents themselves from reaching out for help, believing they’ll be able to solve the issue themselves. The stigma feeds into the stigma.

http://www.tuw.edu/psychology/breaking-americas-mental-health-stigma/

 

 

About Shiloh Vasko

Hi. My name is Shiloh Vasko. I'm a 24-year-old writer from South Jersey, and I hope you can find something here. My goal with this blog is to take the hard times in life and turn them into something useful or helpful for others to take out into their world.
This entry was posted in 123 Archive. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to 5 Sources & Summaries – nobinaryneeded

  1. davidbdale says:

    Hey, NBN, Thanks! I’m very happy to see the Proposal updates start rolling in. I appreciate you being early. I’ve read only the first source so far. As is my nature, I react strongly and immediately to what I read (maybe you do too!), so I want to share my conflicting reactions with you before I lose the contradictory impulses.

    Your Summary is Purposeful. This is primary. You have successfully delivered the essential message of the source material and indicated its value to an argument. Whether or not the source eventually contributes to the argument you decide at the end to make, you’ve communicated its value here for the moment.

    Your Rhetoric. I want to help with this. (You’ll remember how I demonstrated in class my respect for first drafts.) Let’s get your good first draft to an improved second draft by applying just a few basic rules.

    1. Omit needless words.
    2. Be unambiguous about your subjects.
    3. Use the most robust verbs.

    With the stigma surrounding mental health it allows for people to diminish their illnesses without any recognition from their loved ones.

    Suppose your sentence began (which it does): “It allows for people to diminish their illnesses.” Your obvious reaction as reader would be to ask, “WHAT allows for people to diminish their illnesses?” The question demands answering. You don’t answer. You hint. You could easily answer by (Rule 2) being unambiguous about your subject. “The stigma surrounding mental health allows people to diminish their illnesses.”

    The reason most of them do not get help is due to the stigma’s creation, fear of others finding out and fears of their reactions.

    You’re still quibbling about the reason. It’s the stigma (which we should call: unfounded prejudice), but you identify it as 1) the creation of the unfounded prejudice, 2) the fear of discovery of the condition, and 3) the fear of the unfounded prejudice of others. You could be (Rule 2) clear about your subject. “The mentally ill avoid care because they fear the diagnosis, which they know will cause them to be misjudged.”

    Part of that is due to the fact that people have been led to believe that mentally ill people are violent.

    Instead of a robust claim, you qualify your sentence three times. What you mean is, ” . . . as violent.”

    The general public today are two times as likely to believe mentally ill people are violent than they were in the 1950s.

    This is very useful evidence (to those who know it) that the mentally ill are correct to assume they’ll be judged violent. But do they know that? (Your “than they were” wrongly indicates that the misconception is about HOW violent the mentally ill are. You should be saying “than they did” to rightly indicate that the misconception is about WHAT PERCENTAGE of the general population connect the mentally ill and violence.)

    Due to this, a number of tragic events have been linked to mental illness such as shootings, and women drowning their children in bathtubs.

    “Due to” means “caused by.” You use it three times in one paragraph, not once to mean “caused by.” It can AND SHOULD always be replaced by “because” or “because of.” In this case, “Because of.” Because your subject is unclear (Rule 2), we think you mean that THE LINKING of mental illness to violence has caused the violence. What you mean is: “Because the mentally ill avoid treatment, they shoot people and drown their children.” Not because we think there’s a connection.

    Those who shield their mental illness risk worsening their illness, though they don’t seem to care because they are more concerned with what people have to say about it, meanwhile social supports are much needed for recovery.

    The first part of this sentence is just right. The subject (THOSE WHO HIDE THEIR ILLNESS) worsen (ROBUST VERB) their illness BY EVADING THE STIGMA. They flee the very treatment that could help them recover.

    The stigma against mental illness is making the population of the mentally ill scared, which is the opposite of what they need.

    A valid summary but probably needless (Rule 1) if the rest of the paragraph says so.

    SECOND DRAFT:

    The stigma surrounding mental health discourages the mentally ill from admitting their illness, even to their loved ones. They avoid care because they fear the diagnosis, which they know will cause them to be misjudged as violent. Their suspicions are correct: The general public are two times as likely today than in the 1950s to believe mentally ill people are violent. Tragically, the result of their avoiding treatment is that the mentally ill IN FACT DO shoot people or drown their children in bathtubs. Those who shield their mental illness to avoid the stigma flee the very treatment that could help them recover.

    I promise I will stop doing this if you find it aggressive or in any way disrespectful of your good work, NoBinaryNeeded. My goal is to respect the process of recursive writing, sharing ideas, reacting to feedback, taking from others to synthesize a new and better product.

    I recognize your post is a first draft, but I have no way to know what part of your work you would revise, what part you would let stand. My revision offers a possibility to consider.

    Your reply, please. Feedback is a conversation.

    • nobinaryneeded says:

      I definitely appreciate your revisions and will definitely keep them in mind during my final draft of the paper. I like how you suggested stigma as “unfounded prejudice” and then gave me different examples to use in my revisions. In my rewrite I will be sure to be more clear about the subject matter and fail to use “than they were” and use more of “than they did” and “due to” -> “caused by” -> “because” or “because of”. I’ll clean up the misconception about mentally ill people and more clearly define what I’m talking about instead of use “it” or “this”. Thank you for the feedback, It’s much appreciated and I will take all of your notes into consideration in my revisions and final paper.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s