Visual [Redirect] Rhetoric—nickalodeansallthat

0:01: The video begins with a native american male on a traditional style conoe rowing in what appears to be a lake within a forest.  Judging by his garments and the way the sun is angled it looks to be around fall/winter time.

0:02:The next second reveals some brown leaves meaning it its closer to fall, but there also appears to be something next to the mans head, now it could actually be something or it make be the way the light is hitting him, but the angle of the camera reveals that we will get a full scene shot soon or a close of of the man himself

0:03:again similar to shot two, nothing new is reveals, however the man is almost complete with one cycle in the paddling of the canoe

0:04: The camera is mid transition in this second, and it is in fact going to zoom into the mans body and the boat.

0:05-0:10: The camera angle changes a few times to allude to the fact that the man has been rowing for a long while now. this can also be seen with the sun appearing to go down within these shots.

0:11-0:14: A new factor has been added to this mans journey, the paddle, in the shots, is next to some trash within the water. the camera zooms in on the trash showing that its some kind of bag or plastic that just floats in the water. it alludes that it has been there for a while because the garbage looks soaked, and has a deeper colour.

0:15-0:18: What a surprise you can see square shadows on the water at first and then as the camera zooms out the man apparently has rowed into an industrial dock type area. there are looming cranes and visible smoke emitters withing the show by second 18,and they’re are tall dark buildings in the background, with a dark gray sky, a direct difference from the first shot where the sun was pretty visible.

0:19-0:25: How horrible, within these few seconds we see the shadow of the man and nothing but factories and smoke stacks in the background. It appears to be a strip of dark buildings doing nothing but releasing smoke while the sun shines down on the man creating this shadow, literally, of doubt to what alludes if humans can reverse what they’ve done here.

0:26-0:36: This segment starts out with the camera facing the front of the boat,which implies that it will be coming to a stop soon on land, and what a horrible place for the boat to wash up on. towards the end of this segment the man lands on a dark, trash covered beach, where he appears to stumble out of disbelief. After looking around briefly, he begins to walk towards mainland where he leaves the cameras shot.

0:37-0:42: As the man walks up his head is facing west, this implies that we was looking at the city that was in the background a couple of segments ago, but as hes doing this something blurry is within the back of the shot. It is soon reveals to be a highway, with many cars driving towards said city, emitting smoke, and being loud, mobile polluters.

0:43-0:50: As if it couldn’t get any worse the man turns his head towards the highway and as he does a car drives by and throws his trash out the window landing right at the Native Americans man feet. The trash scatters, showing that it was a fast-food meal of some sort. There were a few fries, a fry holder, and some burger wrappers, along with a cup and the bag it came in scattered about at the Natives feet. As the camera pans up, it zooms into the Native mans face, and what is rolling down it? A single tear, the man has become upset to the point of tears at the way people have been treating the earth and using it as a trash disposal. these end segments are a foil to the beginning  segments. These are dull, dreary, dark, and has things like trash and visible smoke, while, in the beginning, there was nature, the sun shining, and clean water. this really elaborates the point that pollutants act destructively fast.

0:51-1:00: This last segment shows a pamphlet that reads ” 71 things you can do to stop pollution” and shows the location you can pick it up, which is radio city in New York City, and gives a number you can call. the last couple seconds shows a black screen with white text that simple reads “Keep America Beautiful”.

Posted in X Archive | 1 Comment

Visual Rhetoric-dunkindonuts10

 

0.01-  This video starts off with two glasses being shown, moving closer to each other in slow motion. These glasses are looked like there is wine inside. They are pretty full and seems like it is two friends meeting to have a drink. The background is dark around the outside then lights up in the middle of the screen to the hands with the glasses directly across from each other.

0.02- 0.06- Still in slow motion, the glasses just keep moving closer and closer to each other, where they look as if they will eventually hit. The so-called wine is moving around in the cup, but not spilling over. The background stays the same throughout the whole time. Looks more of manly hands than a woman’s hand, with no rings and/or other jewelry visible yet.

0.07- Glasses finally hit each other while still moving in slow motion, but when they do they crack and drink begins to spill out. Every piece of glass is falling apart, flying slowly away. Seemed like they were not hitting each other that hard, but did end up breaking the glasses either way. Still no faces visible, just hands, with the dark and white background.

0.08- Hands keep getting closer to each other, while the glasses are still breaking with the drink spilling and glass dropping. No movement has been stopped and nothing has came to help with the crashing.

0.09- Glasses are now completely broken with broken pieces flying everywhere and the drink going in every direction. The hands finally start to move away from each other still in slow motion. At the same time, the picture is getting closer to the hands and glasses.

0.011- 0.13- Camera has moved closer to the hands and accident where we are able to see all the wine spilling, making its way onto the other set of hand to where it eventually has all fell apart. Camera zooms in to the middle where the cups are cracked and drink is flying out.

0.14-0.16- Looks like the same set of hands but are now holding a mug filled with beer. Still moving in slow motion, no changes to the hands or surroundings with the background remaining the same. Hands are in the same place as the previous set and the mugs look like they have a symbol on them, maybe a college logo.

0.17- 0.20-Mugs crash into each other again in slow motion, causing the drink and glass pieces to start flying everywhere. The hands stop moving towards each other once they hit ones-other mug. Now the second time this is happening , seems as this is now being done on purpose. The camera once again zooms into where the crash happened and the drink exploding.

0.21-0.22-More liquid is flying around before, causing more of a mess/damage. The camera its closer and closer as if it is trying to see something specific.

0.23- Same hands appear, in the same place and background, but with a different cup and drink this time. Hands move quicker towards each other this time, but still at a slow pace. Cups are smaller but still almost full with liquid. The hands are still going at each other like the other two times. A third hand comes into the video and starts to grab the cup on the left. Looks like it is trying to stop anything from happening. The third hand was very fast to act as if it was trying to stop the crash to happen again.

0.24-0.30- Hand grabs ahold of the cup on the left to stop it from crashing into the other. Drink in the left hand does spill a little but does not do as much damage as the past times. The two glasses did not even manage to hit this time resulting in no damage. Message appears on screen “Drinking and Driving can kill a friendship”. The overall messages reflects the fact no matter what drink is in the cup, the cups will still manage to hit. As when the second pair of drinks hit, it appeared to be on purpose. Overall showing, the same outcome will take place no matter what kind of drink you decided to have. No alcoholic drink is safer than the other.

 

Posted in X Archive | 3 Comments

Got ’em Need ’em Visual Rhetoric

The completed assignment is due midnight MON FEB 13

Got These

  • Aeks
    • An Excellent model. Read it, and the feedback it has received, if you seek advice on how to handle this assignment.
  • chancetoremember
  • chippy
  • dunkindonuts
  • greeneggsandham
  • kingoflizards
  • nickalodeansallthat
  • nobinaryneeded
  • romansantiago
  • starbucks
  • studentwriter
  • thecommonblackhawk
  • therealjohnsanchez
  • therealmoana

Need These

  • blue
  • kedudnaimad
  • torthey
  • wentzwagon

Link to the Assignment: A05: Visual Rhetoric

Posted in davidbdale, Got 'em, Need 'em | Leave a comment

Visual Rhetoric-aeks123

00:01

In the very beginning, one man opens a garage door to let himself and a workout partner into a gym of some sort. The man who opened the door seems to be the top performer, and the center of our attention. The ad then shows the same middle[-]aged white men side by side on their knees.  Both appear to be pushing heavy exercise equipment forward. Each man is gripping two black bars and seem[s] to be struggling while pushing. [Each is singular and requires a singular verb, like “is,” and like “seems.”]

The back[g]round is blurred for the most part. A white wall with a few white vents can barely be made out; therefore, the men are inside.

The video has a diagonal point of view, so one man is closer to the screen than the other. Since it is set up this way, we can assume the ad wants us to focus on this man, making him the main character. This man is wearing a cut-off shirt. You can tell how hard he is working at pushing this piece of equipment by the muscles popping out in his right arm, the arm that is closest to the screen. He has a look of focus in his blue eyes, and his mouth is closed[,] which also gives him a calm look. He is a clean[-]cut man with brown hair that is styled to one side. [“That” is for restrictive clauses, while “which” is for non-restrictive clauses. “That” does not require a comma; “which” does.” Look these up. They’re very valuable.]

Similar to our main character, the man in the back is wearing a cut-off. The two cut-offs are almost identical. He’s also wearing athletic shorts.  His facial expression is quite different than the other man’s. He is obviously struggling more. He is holding his breath since his cheeks are puffed up with air. He’s squinting and the veins on the side of his head are visible. His muscles are showing, but he doesn’t appear as toned as the other man. This man also has a beard, and has his hair tied in a bun. From the appearance of the two men, the directors probably want us to think that our character has his life more put-together. [Very nice.]

00:02

In this frame, we see our man character, but this time he isn’t with the other man we saw in the first second. He is no longer working out. He is now in an office with three other people who are all dressed business professionally. There is a wooden door that is open, which usually means people are welcome to come in. Behind him on the wall are three gold decorations that have a circular center with lines attached. One of the decorations is bigger than the other two, which could possibly indicate that our main character is supposed to be more important than the other two workers. There is nothing else particularly fancy in the office.

Our main character is wearing a button-up collared shirt with the sleeves rolled halfway up his arm. He is the only one standing at a wooden table, so we assume he’s the one in charge at the meeting. He is looking down and pointing at a piece of paper on the table. The other two people in the office are sitting down on either side of him, and seem to be paying close attention to what he has to say.

The man sitting on his right a black middle[-]aged man, with dark hair and a dark mustache. He has his laptop open in front of him with his hands on the keyboard, but has his attention focused on the piece of paper on the table. He is dressed a little bit more professional[ly], with a suit jacket over his button-up shirt. [The coordinating conjunctions (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, and so) require a comma only when there’s a new subject in the second clause. If your sentence said “He has his laptop open, but HE has his attention focused elsewhere,” a comma would be required.]

On his other side there is woman who we can only see from the side. We can’t really see the expression on her face, but her hair is down and straight, and she is also dressed in work clothes. She has an Ipad on a stand that’s open but is pointing at the same piece of paper.

What’s most intriguing about this frame of the video is a man who’s leaning in the doorway of the office. He looks a little bit younger by the clothes he is wearing. He’s holding some kind of electronic in his hand—most likely a cell phone. He’s holding it up pressed to his chest, so he is probably on hold with someone. His mouth is slightly open, and his smirk shows that he is eager to say something.

00:03

At this part, the camera is zoomed in on the man who was standing in a doorway. The cell phone that was in his hand is no longer there and is now at his ear. He is holding up a large notepad filled with loose-leaf paper. On the front page of the notepad there are large letters written in black marker that take up the whole paper. It reads, “WE LANDED THE ACCOUNT!” It is now clear that he is on the phone with the person who landed the account for the company. We can now see this man close up. He is looking at eye level, so he is only concerned with sharing the information with our main character, which again emphasizes that our main character is in charge. Since this man didn’t say the information out loud, he probably didn’t want the other two workers to hear. Maybe our main character is the boss of the company, and the rest of the workers weren’t supposed to know this information yet. The man who held up the paper has a smirk on his face in and his eyes are squinted, so he seems excited about relaying this information.

00:04

There now seems to be a trend going on in the ad. We see [We’ve seen] our character in multiple settings within just a few seconds of the video, so things are developing very quickly. This time he’s in a bar/club setting. The camera is again zoomed in[,] so it’s hard to tell much about where exactly he is. We can only see him from about his neck up. He is leaning on something, probably a bar, and is sitting down. A few bright lights are blurred shining in the back, leading us to believe he is in some sort of club. He has a glass up to his mouth that is half full of some kind of beer.

Both of his eyes are glancing over to a white woman who [is] sitting closely next to him. She’s also holding a glass that’s a little bit less full than his. Her face is barely in our view, but we can make out that she is smiling at something with her mouth slightly open. She’s looking down into her drink, which almost makes it look like she is laughing at her drink. We don’t know if these two people are friends, strangers, or maybe even relatives. The man is holding his drink with his left hand, which has no ring on it, so these two definitely aren’t married. If they are at club, it’s most likely that they’ve never met before.

00:05

The woman is no longer visible in this frame. The camera is zoomed and focused on the man’s face, who is still sitting at the bar. He chugged the rest of his beer, since the glass that was half full a second ago is now empty. It’s still up to his mouth, and his attention is no longer on the woman. He is looking forward and up, probably at the bartender who is standing behind the bar. He has an intense look and seems like as soon as he puts down his drink he’s going to ask for another one. His eyes are extremely glossy, so he is intoxicated at this point. The longest scene in the ad so far has been our character at the bar drinking, which shows it’s an important moment we should focus on.

00:07

The man and the woman have now left the club and are about to enter a white car. The man is reaching for the handle to the driver’s door, and the woman is walking towards the passenger’s side. Her body is mostly blocked by the car[,] but her long, hair is showing. Both [They] are smiling at each other over the roof of the car. They seem to only be thinking [only] about each other, and not about what they are about to do.

Behind them looks like a city, and it is night time. The car is parked in what looks like an alley, but surrounded by concrete buildings and pillars. They might be in a parking garage. It’s most likely fall or winter, since the man is wearing a black jacket over his button-up shirt. He doesn’t have it zipped, and it doesn’t look heavy, so it must not be that cold out.

00:09

In this part, the camera is zoomed in on the man’s hand as he’s opening the driver door. All we can see is his hand and the door handle. They want us to focus on this action since they zoomed in so closely. He’s getting into the driver’s seat after drinking, which is a significant moment worth acknowledging.

00:11

This scene is interesting because almost directly after he gets into his car, sirens light up behind him. The red and blue sirens are shining brightly through his rear window, around the outline of his backseats. The lights also reflect off his face, which takes up a big portion of the screen. On his forehead, the lights are the brightest. There are also two specks of light on his chin that stand out. We can see the shape of his face and top half of his body. He is frowning[,] and his eyes are big with worry. Instead of looking back at the police car, he is looking off to the side where the woman was getting in. He doesn’t seem worried that the police are behind him. He seems more concerned about what the woman is doing.

00:13

We can see the woman clearly for the first time in this visual. She hasn’t gotten in the car yet, and is standing outside. The view is from inside the car, so we can see the shadow of the back of the man’s head as she glares at him with a look of disappointment on her face. She has a thin figure, and is Latino.  She looks cold, and has her arms folded to keep her warm.  She is dressed for a night out at the club. The blue light from the siren is reflecting of off her face and outfit. Her lips are pursed, and she seems annoyed. Her facial expression is probably due to the fact that she’s cold, and partly because the man she was about to go home with got pulled over by the police.

Behind her is a building that seems up-scale. It’s concrete, but has dark green doors with rectangular window panels that make it look elaborate. In front of the building is a short black gate that sits on top on top of brick wall. They must have a good amount of money, judging from their outfits and the place the type of club they’re at. We already know he has a job and belongs to a gym, so it makes sense that he would have money.

00:14

We are in a court in this next frame. We don’t see a trial happen. All we see a crisp picture of a gavel banging down on a desk in this picture. The directors only wanted us to focus [only] on the guilty verdict. It’s black with a thick gold strip in in the middle. Gripping it is a judge who’s blurred in the back. Half of his white face is showing just below his eyes. He isn’t smiling or frowning; he just has a simple expression on his face. He is sitting in a chair at a desk, and in the very back corner we can see the red and white stripes of an American flag.

00:15

We are back to the gym the main character was in during the first second of the video. This time we get a better look at what’s inside the gym. It doesn’t look like a typical gym with exercise equipment everywhere. It’s more of warehouse, with very high ceilings. There’s [are] white concrete walls and a huge black door that looks like it’s a garage door. It’s used for more high-intensity training.  A bunch of ropes hang from the ceiling, and three orange cones are set up on the ground near the garage door. It’s daytime now because we can see natural light coming in, and the panels of lights on the ceiling are turned off.

There are four men running in the gym. They look like they are just taking off for a sprint, since they are leaning forward heavily. Three of the men, who are wearing athletic gear and sneakers, are about even with each other. Our main character, however, is about two paces behind. He is wearing a blue t-shirt, black shorts, and black Nike shoes. It’s important to point out that he is behind because in the beginning, he seemed to have no problem with the weight he was pushing. He was struggling less than the other guy he was with and now he seems to be struggling the most.

00:16

Our main character has now stopped running. We just see him, zoomed in close, looking at his black Iphone. His mouth is open slightly, and he has a worried look on his face. He’s not as focused on working out as he was in the beginning of the ad, so this is clearly affecting him in a negative way.

00:17

His phone is supposed to be the center of our attention now. The screen is zoomed in on an[?] in big red letters it reads, “Overdraft Notice.” Underneath that in small black letters it says, “You were charged on Overdraft Fee of $25. View Account Balance.” At the top it says “OneBank,” which is the name of his bank. We also see the time[;] it’s 11am. This shows us that the guilty verdict from drinking and driving has really affected his life. It’s cost him a lot of money, and distracted him from his daily routines.

00:18

We are now back to the office setting again. He is in the same room with the same people as earlier, except everyone is wearing different outfits. The Asian woman and black man are sitting on one side of the table, and the guy who was at the door is now sitting down on the other side of the table. Our main character is standing at the head of the table pointing at papers that everyone seems to be focused on. This time, however, he has his phone on the table. Even though he is pointing at the papers, his attention seems to focused on his phone, and not his work.

00:19

The camera is now on the cell phone that was sitting at the table. We see his hand reaching out at the phone. He is getting a phone call from his lawyer. On the screen it reads “BENTLEY & YEATS CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS.” Underneath it shows the answer button, and his hand is covering where it would normally say “decline.”

00:20

Our main character and the woman he met at the club are at the same spot they were when they left the club last time. He is reaching at the handle of the same white car, in the same parking spot. Both are smiling at each other over the roof of the car. The directors want to emphasize that he is in the exact same situation as last time. Will he make the same mistake[,] or will he think about his actions this time?

00:22

Zoomed in on the white handle, we see his hand about to open the driver’s door yet again. The directors really want us to focus on this significant moment again.

00:23

Instead of opening car door, he again looks up and straight ahead at the woman who is standing on the other side of the car. All we see in this picture is the smile on his face and a portion of the car roof. This signifies that he was thinking about what he was doing before he acting upon it, unlike the first time he decided to get in the car. He didn’t want to endanger the life of the woman he was with, or have to go through the whole process of court again.

00:24

A yellow taxi pulls up. He chose to call a taxi this time instead of driving after drinking. We only get [only] a side view of it, but since it has sliding doors, it’s probably a van. The back door is slid open and we see the woman, who is again dressed in clothes for a night out at the club. He is on the side of her, helping her get in, showing he cares about her. The taxi is pulled over, and only lights from the street are showing.

00:26

The taxi is driving away[,] and we have a view from the back of it. It is definitely a van. The red brake lights are shining on both sides of the van. They are driving through some type of tunnel with concrete walls on either side of them.  Over top of the taxi there are big white letters that say “Buzzed Driving is Drunk Driving.” This is the last frame of video.

The phrase written describes the main message of the PSA. We saw what the main character had to go through by getting a lawyer and possibly fines that made him overdraft on his account. It disrupted his whole daily routine. We saw at the end how when he was put in the same situation, he decided to call a taxi instead of driving buzzed.

Buzzed Driving Prevention

Posted in X Archive | 11 Comments

Should Have Been A Reply to My Post, Not a New Post

Homelessness is a huge problem in our country, but not many people truly understand what it is. The thought of a homeless person is in most cases a negative one and many people never think twice about the homeless. The homeless are looked down on and are forgotten about and people need to remember that they are just like the rest of us. The issue of homelessness is something that will take a lot of hard work and time to overcome but there are solutions. We cannot lose faith in combatting this issue because it may be challenging, but there are ways to start fixing homelessness.

Posted in X Archive | 1 Comment

Snowday Agenda

snowday

Posted in davidbdale | Leave a comment

Proposal-starbucks

It seems counterintuitive that so many people look down upon the legalization of marijuana. Although it does have negative factors, it also has positive ones that many people do not know about. A positive aspect would include safety control. If a person buys marijuana from a person, they have no way of knowing for sure what substances are actually in it. For the states that have already legalized it, a framework for a safety control system is created to get rid of the risk coming from smoking it. Another positive outcome of legalizing the drug would be enhancing medical treatment. Marijuana can be beneficial in treating certain health conditions, so more people will be able to use it for its health benefits. There are many other positive measures of the legalization, so rather than only looking at the bad people need to start looking at what it can do to help people around the country.

Posted in starbucks | 3 Comments

Proposal—nickalodeansallthat

It seems counter intuitive how America claims to be the land of the free, but when immigrants come they have to be Americanized or else they become a complete pest. With that it is counter intuitive that they need to be Americanized but we also tell them to respect their heritage and to be proud of it. America is a massive topsy-turvy place, more so then we perceive it to be, and with recent events, some of us have to question if it really is the land of free. Id like to look more in-depth to how counter intuitive America’s famous phrase really is towards those that come here to start a new. But is it really coming to a safe haven or is it straight of the frying pan into the fire?

Sources so far:

https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/news/2011/12/15/10759/the-publics-view-of-immigration/

Detained immigrants often face harsh, unfair treatment in U.S. hands, study says

How Americans View Immigrants, and What They Want from Immigration Reform: Findings from the 2015 American Values Atlas

http://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/immigration-and-americanization

http://cis.org/BecomingAmerican-ImmigrationDebate

Posted in X Archive | 5 Comments

Proposal- therealjohnsanchez

Proposal

It seems counterintuitive that a group of people is less likely to help a person in distress than a single person. A group of people has the potential to do more than just a single person but groups often stay passive while a single person may take action. My essay will be on the bystander effect. I will prove that a single person is more helpful than a group of people. A single bystander feels responsible for helping a person in trouble while the feeling of responsibility is diluted in a group. This causes a group to not help a person in need.

Smoke Filled Room
http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/10/3/215/

This experiment shows how a single person is more likely to take action than a group of people. In the experiment, subjects sit in a room taking a test. Smoke starts coming out from under the door to the other room. When a person is in the room alone, they were more likely to react to the smoke and get help. When three people were together, they were more likely to continue taking the test. They would look at each other’s reactions to try and decide whether they should do something.

This study showed that people in groups first look to each other before they decide what to do. It also showed that a lone person is more likely to act than a group. It is important because is shows how differently a person act when in a group.

The Bystander Effect:The Death of Kitty Genovese
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdpdUbW8vbw

The story of Kitty Genovese’s murder is what inspired much of the research on the bystander effect. Kitty was attacked at 3am in front of her apartment building. Her screams woke up some of the people in the apartments. After being stabbed and calling for help, one man yelled at the assailant to leave her alone. This scared him off. She crawled across the street to her apartment. When he came back, he found her in a hallway and killed her.

12 people watched the first time she was stabbed. No one called the police. When asked why they didn’t do something, they said that they didn’t want to get involved or assumed someone else would help her. Her murder shows how people in a group fell less of a duty to help a person. They assume someone else will help so that they don’t have to.

Self-Categorization and Bystander Non-intervention: Two Experimental Studies
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01446.x/epdf

This study explores how people react differently based on who the victim is and who their fellow bystanders are. The study found that bystanders are more likely to take action if the victim is part of their in group. It also found that bystanders are more likely to take action if the other bystanders are part of their in group. This study helps explain why groups don’t help a victim. They can see a victim as part of another group and feel less responsibility for them. When the other bystanders are part of the out group, each person is not sure what is expected of them and often don’t do anything.

Police: As many as 20 present at gang rape outside school dance
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/10/27/california.gang.rape.investigation/

A 15 year old girl was gang raped by up to 10 people outside a high school dance. 10 other people watched without intervening or calling the police. She was found unconscious, in critical condition, by a cop. The cop was called by a person who had heard kids talking about the rape.

This is another example of a group failing to stop a terrible crime. Any of the 10 bystanders could have called the police but they all chose just to watch. The rape wasn’t reported until one person overheard kids talking about it. It shows that one person felt responsible to call the police while a group of 10 people felt no need to.

The Bystander Effect
https://www.verywell.com/the-bystander-effect-2795899

This article explains the bystander effect and why it might occur. It claims that the diffusion of responsibility causes the bystander effect. When people are in a group, each person feels less pressure to act. It also explains what was discovered in the smoke experiment. People in a group look at others for the proper response. If others don’t react, then people assume the proper response is not to do anything.

Posted in X Archive | 7 Comments

Proposal+5 – wentzwagon11

It seems counterintuitive that baseball players have been evaluated by the eye test for over a century and now teams are abandoning that approach all together. The eye test is the layman’s term for evaluating a players talent strictly on the basis of what a scout can see. This approach has been around for as long as baseball has been played. However there are now complex statistics that create a new formula for signing players onto a team. One stat in particular is considered, among baseball analysts, as the scale for a players worth to his team. This stat is Wins Above Replacement, or “WAR”. WAR calculates how much better a player is than the league average for his position on purely a statistical basis. While statistics are important, they aren’t the end all be all for how good a player really is. Most general managers and front office executives are either new era statistical evaluators or old school scouts. Neither approach is nonsensical and both have proven to be successful, so the next step should be an appropriate blend of the two.

Birnbaum, Phil. “A Guide to Sabermetric Research.” A Guide to Sabermetric Research | Society for American Baseball Research. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Feb. 2017.

Glassey, Conor, and 2010 August 18. “Majors: Best Tools: Scouts On Scouting: What They Look For In A Player.” BaseballAmericacoms RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Feb. 2017.

Hagen, Paul. “New and Old School Coming Together in Baseball Talent Evaluation.”Major League Baseball. N.p., 14 Mar. 2013. Web. 06 Feb. 2017.

Paine, Neil. “Where Sabermetrics And the ‘Eye Test’ Disagree.” FiveThirtyEight. FiveThirtyEight, 14 Mar. 2016. Web. 06 Feb. 2017.

Weinberg, Neil. “How to Evaluate a Hitter, Sabermetrically.” Beyond the Box Score. Beyond the Box Score, 26 May 2014. Web. 06 Feb. 2017.

Posted in X Archive | 3 Comments